Skip to content

· Private foundation

Elmer & Kaya Berg Foundation No 2

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$201k
Granted FY2024still arriving
31
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$35k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

95% of Elmer & Kaya Berg Foundation No 2’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Fargo-Moorhead Area Foundation Corporation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 5 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Elmer & Kaya Berg Foundation No 2 named its own grantees at scale: 15 organizations, $201k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

24
’20
24
’21
23
’22
21
’23
15
’24
5
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$2.8MEducation$320kHuman Services$253kHealth$141kHousing & Shelter$123kReligion$122kYouth Development$61kArts & Culture$55kOther$0
02FY2024 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k27 grants · $116k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $85k
$4,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEXUS-PATH FAMILY HEALING$35,000
CONCORDIA COLLEGE$30,000
VILLAGE FAMILY SERVICES$10,000
SHANLEY HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
NOKOMIS CHILD CARE CENTER$9,500
CHURCHES UNITED FOR THE HOMELESS$8,000
OAK GROVE LUTHERAN SCHOOL$7,500
NEW LIFE CENTER$7,500
GREAT PLAINS FOOD BANK$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,500
SANFORD MEDICAL FOUNDATION$7,000
SMITH-LEMLI-OPITZ FOUNDATION$6,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DETROIT LAKES$5,000
YWCA CASS & CLAY COUNTIES$5,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PERHAM$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $108k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DETROIT LAKES COMMUNITY AND CULTURAL CENTER: $3k → 10%DETROIT LAKES COMMUNITY AND CULTURAL CENTER: $3k → 10%DETROIT LAKES COMMUNITY AND CULTURAL CENTER: $3k → 10%NEXUS-PATH FAMILY HEALING: $35k → 12%DETROIT LAKES COMMUNITY AND CULTURAL CENTER: $3k → 10%DETROIT LAKES COMMUNITY AND CULTURAL CENTER: $3k → 10%PATRIOT ASSISTANCE DOGS: $2k → 10%NEXUS-PATH FAMILY HEALING: $7k → 12%NEXUS-PATH FAMILY HEALING: $2k → 12%NEXUS-PATH FAMILY HEALING: $2k → 12%FRASER LTD: $2k → 12%FRASIER LTD: $2k → 12%FRASIER LTD: $2k → 12%FRASER LTD: $2k → 12%FRASIER LTD: $2k → 12%NEXUS-PATH FAMILY HEALING: $35k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 31% of Elmer & Kaya Berg Foundation No 2’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 88% of the giving stays in ND; by stated purpose, 86%.

Elmer & Kaya Berg Foundation No 2lessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 55 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

55 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
7

Total granted

$1.2M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+240%

Still filing today

35%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentReligionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DETROIT LAKES
    5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +60%
  • GP
    Great Plains Food Bank
    6× · 2020–2025 · $23k · revenue +14%
  • PO
    PEACE OFFICER JAIL CHAPLAINS ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $17k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
  • SH
    SMP HEALTH - ST CATHERINE NORTH
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Charities North Dakota

Guided by our values, Catholic Charities North Dakota serves people in need and advocates for the common good of all.

—
2
Retrieve a Golden of Minnesota (Ragom) Inc

Retrieve a golden of the midwest (ragom) rescues, fosters, and rehomes golden retrievers and golden mixes that can no longer remain in their current environments. the organization ensures each dog receives necessary veterinary care and…

Animals
3
North Dakota Natural Resources Trust
—
4
Feeding South Dakota

To eliminate hunger in south dakota.

Food & Nutrition
5
Easter Seals Goodwill Nd Inc

Easter Seals Goodwill ND, Inc. is a leading organization in supporting children, adults, and families to have equal opportunities to live, learn, work, and play in their communities.

Health
6
North Dakota News Cooperative
Arts & Culture
7
Southeastern North Dakota Community Action Agency

Southeastern north dakota community action agency (sendcaa) was formed in 1965 to provide a range of services and activities in a six county area designed to alleviate poverty and give low-income people the opportunity to improve their…

Human Services
8
Dakota Plains Legal Services

To promote equal access to justice and improve the lives of low-income clients through quality legal assistance

—
9
The Open Door

The open door is a leading hunger-relief organization serving dakota county, minnesota, where food insecurity is a growing challenge. the open door is dedicated to ending local hunger by providing access to healthy, fresh, and nutritious…

Food & Nutrition
10
Nd Association of Counties

NDACo provides leadership and services to foster effective and efficient government for the good of all counties.

—
11
Dakota Children's Advocacy Center

To provide a safe, family friendly environment that promotes hope, health, and healing to traumatized children and their families.

Human Services
12
Red River Valley Fair Association

To promote, foster, operate and maintain a fair, agricultural and livestock exposition, annually, at the red river valley fairgrounds, west fargo, cass county, north dakota

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Plains Art Museum; the most unlike its peers is Beggining Child Care Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FARGO-MOORHEAD AREA FOUNDATION CORPORATION: $2,831,385 · PhilanthropyFARGO-MOORHEAD AREA FOUNDATION CORPORATIONCONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION: $221,500 · OtherCONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATI…SANFORD MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $87,000 · OtherSANFORD MEDICAL FOUNDATIONCHURCHES UNITED FOR THE HOMELESS: $78,000 · OtherCHURCHES UNITED FOR THE HOM…OAK GROVE LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL: $55,000 · OtherOAK GROVE LUTHERAN HIGH SCH…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DETROIT LAKES: $50,000 · OtherVILLAGE FAMILY SERVICES: $49,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $47,500 · Other+44 more: $402,000 · Other+44 moreNEXUS-PATH FAMILY HEALING: $81,300 · Human ServicesRape and Abuse Crisis Center of Fargo-Moorhead: $15,000 · Human ServicesDLCCC INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesFRASER LTD: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesSMITH-LEMLI-OPITZ FOUNDATION: $14,700 · Arts & CulturePLAINS ART MUSEUM: $10,000 · Arts & CultureRED RIVER VALLEY VETERANS CONCERT BAND INC: $8,000 · Arts & CultureGreat Plains Food Bank: $23,000 · Food & NutritionBECKER COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC: $7,500 · Food & NutritionRed River Childrens Advocacy Center: $12,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE RED RIVER VALLEY: $8,000 · Youth DevelopmentPEACE OFFICER JAIL CHAPLAINS ASSOCIATION: $16,500 · Religion
Philanthropy$2,831,385Other$990,500Human Services$123,300Arts & Culture$32,700Food & Nutrition$30,500Youth Development$20,000Religion$16,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION: $221,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNEXUS-PATH FAMILY HEALING: $81,300 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DETROIT LAKES: $50,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetGreat Plains Food Bank: $23,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPEACE OFFICER JAIL CHAPLAINS ASSOCIATION: $16,500 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetRape and Abuse Crisis Center of Fargo-Moorhead: $15,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLake Agassiz Habitat for Humanity: $15,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetDLCCC INC: $15,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSMITH-LEMLI-OPITZ FOUNDATION: $14,700 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetRed River Childrens Advocacy Center: $12,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPLAINS ART MUSEUM: $10,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFRASER LTD: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRED RIVER VALLEY VETERANS CONCERT BAND INC: $8,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetNORTH COUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE RED RIVER VALLEY: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTH DAKOTA INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBECKER COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC: $7,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetUNSEEN: $7,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBEGGINING CHILD CARE CENTER: $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHERO HEALTHCARE EQUIPMENT RECYCLING ORGANIZATION: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPATRIOT ASSISTANCE DOGS: $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget4 LUV OF DOG RESCUE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FARGO-MOORHEAD AREA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NEXUS-PATH FAMILY HEALING ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DETROIT LAKES ↗
  • Who funds Great Plains Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds PEACE OFFICER JAIL CHAPLAINS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Rape and Abuse Crisis Center of Fargo-Moorhead ↗
  • Who funds Lake Agassiz Habitat for Humanity ↗
  • Who funds DLCCC INC ↗
  • Who funds SMITH-LEMLI-OPITZ FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Red River Childrens Advocacy Center ↗
  • Who funds PLAINS ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds FRASER LTD ↗
  • Who funds RED RIVER VALLEY VETERANS CONCERT BAND INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH COUNTRY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE RED RIVER VALLEY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Barry FoundationND45× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Barry Foundation · Fargo-Moorhead Area Foundation Corporation · Midcontinent Foundation · Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota Caring Foundation · Dakota Medical Foundation · Sanford Group Return · Offutt Family Foundation · Alex Stern Family Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · United Way of Cass-Clay · First Lutheran Church Foundation · Dakota Medical Charities

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Elmer & Kaya Berg Foundation No 2 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elmer & Kaya Berg Foundation No 2. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Elmer & Kaya Berg Foundation No 2’s filings →

    More from the funding graph