· Public charity
Ellis Center for Educational Excellence
To perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of the arizona community foundation, an az nonprofit corporation, so long as the arizona community foundation, inc.
Read this first · the figures below need context
100% of Ellis Center for Educational Excellence’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Arizona Community Foundation, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Ellis Center for Educational Excellence named its own grantees at scale: 12 organizations, $2M. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $1.1M
- $250k+1 grant · $696k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $696,300 |
| EDUCATION FORWARD ARIZONA | $200,000 |
| TNTP INC | $130,000 |
| MAKE WAY FOR BOOKS | $115,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION | $115,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - PHOENIX | $100,000 |
| EDUCATION DESIGN LAB | $100,000 |
| ARIZONA CENTER FOR AFRICAN AMERICAN RESOURCES | $90,000 |
| ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $80,000 |
| MILLION DOLLAR TEACHER PROJECT | $75,000 |
| ADVOCACY31NINE | $50,000 |
| COMPUTER SCIENCE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $950k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 12% of Ellis Center for Educational Excellence’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 90% of the giving stays in AZ; read by stated purpose it is 96% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $826k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY8× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +196%- LTLIVE THE SOLUTION DBA EARN TO LEARN4× · 2017–2022 · $500k · revenue +156%
- CFCENTER FOR THE FUTURE OF ARIZONA2× · 2018–2020 · $425k · revenue +115%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $209k
- EREDUCATION RESOURCE STRATEGIES INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $165k · revenue +56%
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $154k · revenue +110%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The arizona center for afterschool excellence is dedicated to the enhancement of child and youth development and educational achievement through quality afterschool programming.
To celebrate excellence and cultivate opportunity in pk-12th grade arizona public education.
We facilitate effective, bipartisan partnerships needed to achieve educational excellence and scale success across arizona's public schools - both district and charter.
Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…
To bring arizona's community colleges together to share ideas, collaborate, and drive meaningful change. we act as a statewide hub providing colleges best practices, annual convenings, and professional development.
To elevate the education profession and promote the cause of education and to provide member support in arizona.
To connect and strengthen arizona's technology industry and community, promote state and federal policies that enhance arizona's technology industry, deliver quality content and events to educate those working in arizona's expanding…
To provide support and services to arizona's charter schools while promoting high student achievement through quality charter schools.
Operation of a private school
To reach and teach every arizona student to become financially and economically responsible in work and life.
To assist member firms in achieving higher professional, ethical business and economic standards, enabling member firms to provide quality consulting and engineering services for their clients and the public.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Phoenix Chamber Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Instituto Lab. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
79 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 79 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds AFC PUBLIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LIVE THE SOLUTION DBA EARN TO LEARN ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR THE FUTURE OF ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR ECONOMIC INNOVATION INC ↗
- Who funds CREIGHTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMON SENSE MEDIA ↗
- Who funds Make Way For Books ↗
- Who funds MARICOPA COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds National Center for Youth Law ↗
- Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION FORWARD ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - PHOENIX ↗
- Who funds Instituto Lab ↗
- Who funds GREATER PHOENIX CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION DESIGN LAB ↗
- Who funds Northbridge College Success Program ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA CENTER FOR AFRICAN AMERICAN RESOURCES ↗
- Who funds Million Dollar Teacher Project ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION RESOURCE STRATEGIES INC ↗
- Who funds Jobs for Arizona's Graduates ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ACLU FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST ↗
- Who funds SAVE OUR SCHOOLS ARIZONA NETWORK ↗
- Who funds STAND FOR CHILDREN LEADERSHIP CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds VISTA COLLEGE PREPARATORY INC ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA COMMUNITY COLLEGE COORDINATING COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA BUSINESS & EDUCATION COALITION ↗
- Who funds TNTP INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS ACTION ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds ADVOCACY 31NINE ↗
- Who funds STAND FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Burton Family Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Valley of the Sun United Way · Helios Education Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · Phoenix Community Development and Investment Corporation · John F Long Foundation Inc · Garcia Family Foundation · BHHS Legacy Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ellis Center for Educational Excellence funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Education Resource Strategies Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.