Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ellen Soren Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$88k
Granted FY2022
17
Grants FY2022
—
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$178kHuman Services$65kEducation$50kArts & Culture$27kAnimals$27kFood & Nutrition$13kCivil Rights$13kPhilanthropy$10kOther$0
02FY2022 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $74,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $88,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $14,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k12 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
$2,500
Median grant
—
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH UNITED FUND$10,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$10,000
LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$10,000
LYNN SAGE BREAST CANCER FDN$10,000
ANTI-SEMITISM DEFAMATION LEAGUE$10,000
PAWS$5,000
LYNN SAGE BREAST CANCER FDN$3,000
US HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$2,500
US HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$2,500
UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM$2,500
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$2,000
HIGHLAND PARK COMMUNITY FDN$2,000
GREATER CHGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$2,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$1,000
GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MAKE A WISH: $3k → 11%GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION: $1k → 7%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $1k → 17%US HOLOCAUST MUSEUM: $5k → 14%ST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $3k → 17%RONALD MC DONALD HOUSE CHARITIES: $10k → 7%FRANCIS W PARKER SCHOOL: $20k → 14%MAKE A WISH: $3k → 11%US HOLOCAUST MUSEUM: $5k → 14%ST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $3k → 17%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES: $10k → 7%FRANCIS W PARKER SCHOOL: $10k → 14%MAKE A WISH: $3k → 11%US HOLOCAUST MUSEUM: $3k → 14%RONALD MC DONALD HOUSE CHARITIES: $10k → 7%FRANCIS W PARKER SCHOOL: $10k → 14%MAKE A WISH: $3k → 11%US HOLOCAUST MUSEUM: $3k → 14%RONALD MC DONALD HOUSE CHARITIES: $10k → 7%FRANCIS W PARKER SCHOOL: $10k → 14%MAKE A WISH: $3k → 11%RONALD MC DONALD HOUSE CHARITIES: $10k → 7%PAWS OF CHICAGO: $5k → 14%NO KID HUNGRY: $2k → 14%FEED CHICAGO INC: $5k → 14%SPECIAL OYMPICS: $2k → 14%PAWS OF CHICAGO: $5k → 14%SPECIAL OLYMPICS: $1k → 14%PAWS OF CHICAGO: $5k → 14%PAWS OF CHICAGO: $5k → 14%SEE ATTACHED: $125k → 14%SEE ATTACHED: $112k → 14%SEE ATTACHED: $109k → 14%SUSAN G KOMEN RACE FOR THE CURE: $5k → 14%LYNN SAGE CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%LYNN SAGE CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICA: $15k → 14%LYNN SAGE CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%LYNN SAGE CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICA: $10k → 14%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICA: $10k → 14%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICA: $10k → 14%LYNN SAGE CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICA: $10k → 14%MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $3k → 14%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $2k → 14%ILLINOIS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM: $3k → 14%GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$305k · 16 repeat orgs$92k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 15 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
10

Total granted

$305k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+28%

Still filing today

69%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
HealthArts & CultureAnimalsFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    LYNN SAGE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $70k · revenue +134%
  • Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
    5× · 2017–2021 · $55k · revenue +60%
  • RM
    Ronald McDonald House Global
    5× · 2017–2021 · $50k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • PC
    PROSPER CHICAGO INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -97%
  • SG
    SUSAN G KOMEN RACE FOR THE CURE
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IH
    ILLINOIS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stanley Manne Childrens Research Institute

Stanley manne children's research institute strives to generate new knowledge and advance the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of pediatric diseases.

Health
2
Children's Hospital of Chicago Medical Center

We are dedicated to the health and well-being of all children. as the pediatric teaching facility for the northwestern university feinberg school of medicine, this commitment drives us to be a leader in: -pediatric health care delivery…

Health
3
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
4
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
5
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
6
Pediatric Faculty Foundation Inc

We value excellence and innovation in clinical and basic research, coordinated and comprehensive patient care, ongoing physician education, and evidence-based child advocacy. our goal is to provide leadership in endeavors that promote the…

Health
7
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
8
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
9
Lurie Children's Surgical Foundation Inc

Provide pediatric and subspecialty surgical, research, and educational services.

—
10
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago

SRAlab is dedicated to providing the best patient outcomes through the highest-quality clinical care, translational research, scientific discovery and education.

Health
11
The Adler Planetarium

The adler planetarium ('adler') is a not-for-profit cultural institution whose mission is to connect people to the universe and each other under the sky we all share. it aspires to be the world's premier center for engaging in astronomy…

Arts & Culture
12
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Museum of Contemporary Art; the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
16/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LYNN SAGE BREAST CANCER FDN: $13,000 · OtherLYNN SAGE BREAST CANCER FDNIndividual grant recipient: $12,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $10,000 · OtherLURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITALANTI-SEMITISM DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $10,000 · OtherANTI-SEMITISM DEFAMATION LEAGUEJEWISH UNITED FUND: $10,000 · OtherJEWISH UNITED FUNDRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES: $10,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIESUS HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM: $5,000 · OtherST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $5,000 · OtherPAWS: $5,000 · OtherSUSAN G KOMEN RACE FOR THE CURE: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $4,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $4,100 · Other+13 more: $20,000 · Other+13 moreAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $55,000 · HealthAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's…Ronald McDonald House Global: $50,000 · HealthRonald McDonald House Global+3 more: $4,000 · HealthLYNN SAGE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $70,015 · Housing & ShelterLYNN SAGE BREAST CA…Francis W Parker School: $50,000 · EducationFrancis W Park…PAWS CHICAGO: $20,500 · Animals+1 more: $500 · AnimalsThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $16,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $3,497 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & CulturePROSPER CHICAGO INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $4,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$118,100Health$109,000Housing & Shelter$70,015Education$50,000Animals$21,000Arts & Culture$19,997Food & Nutrition$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLYNN SAGE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $70,015 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $55,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFrancis W Parker School: $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPAWS CHICAGO: $20,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $16,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $4,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $3,497 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUMINARTS CULTURAL FOUNDATION THE UNION LEAGUE CLUB OF CHICAGO: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP OF DREAMS: $1,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER WELLNESS CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Children's Museum: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOR AUTISTIC KIDS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LYNN SAGE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Global ↗
  • Who funds Francis W Parker School ↗
  • Who funds PAWS CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds PROSPER CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART ↗
  • Who funds GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
  • Who funds LUMINARTS CULTURAL FOUNDATION THE UNION LEAGUE CLUB OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds CAMP OF DREAMS ↗
  • Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds CANCER WELLNESS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Children's Museum ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds FOR AUTISTIC KIDS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ellen Soren Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ellen Soren Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $125k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ellen Soren Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph