Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ella Weiss Educational Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$247k
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$175
Median grant
1
States reached
$621k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OHIO UNIVERSITY$2,450
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY$1,050
MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY$875
OHIO UNIVERSITY ZANESVILLE$525
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI$350
ASHLAND UNIVERSITY$175
UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE$175
OTTERBEIN UNIVERSITY$175
CENTRAL OHIO TECHNICAL COLLEGE$175
UNIVERSITY OF FINDLAY$175
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY$175
UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON$175
HEIDELBERG UNIVERSITY$175
WALSH UNIVERSITY$175
BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY$175
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 77% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%UNIVERSITY OF FINDLAY: $175 → 9%WAYNE COUNTY SCHOOLS CAREER CENTER: $2k → 10%CENTRAL OHIO TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $175 → 10%ASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $175 → 11%HEIDELBERG UNIVERSITY: $175 → 12%BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY: $175 → 12%WALSH UNIVERSITY: $175 → 13%OHIO UNIVERSITY ZANESVILLE: $525 → 14%UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON: $175 → 14%OHIO NORTHERN UNIVERSITY: $175 → 15%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI: $350 → 16%CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $175 → 17%UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE: $175 → 20%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $2k → 22%MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $875 → 14%OTTERBEIN UNIVERSITY: $175 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$192k · 31 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
42

Total granted

$192k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+14%

Still filing today

29%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $350 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ON
    Ohio Northern University
    5× · 2020–2025 · $17k · revenue +17%
  • UO
    University of Dayton
    5× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue +27%
  • OU
    Otterbein University
    5× · 2020–2025 · $9k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • TO
    THE OHIO STATE UNIVERISTY
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Mount Union

The university affirms the institution's mission to prepare students for fulfilling lives, meaningful work and responsible citizenship. the university of mount union offers undergraduate and graduate degrees in a wide array of academic…

Education
2
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
5
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
6
Mercyhurst University

Rooted in our Mercy Catholic liberal arts identity, we educate and inspire diverse learners in an environment where faith and reason flourish together for meaningful lives, dignified work, and leadership in service toward a just and loving…

Education
7
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
8
Excelsior University

Excelsior University provides educational opportunity to adult learners with an emphasis on those historically underrepresented in higher education. The University meets students where they are - academically and geographically, offering…

Education
9
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
10
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
11
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
12
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ohio Northern University; the most unlike its peers is Case Western Reserve University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY: $28,250 · OtherKENT STATE UNIVERSITYOHIO STATE UNIV: $10,350 · OtherOHIO STATE UNIVIndividual grant recipient: $8,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,500 · OtherOHIO UNIVERSITY: $8,100 · OtherTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERISTY: $7,500 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON: $7,500 · Other+49 more: $89,500 · Other+49 moreOhio Northern University: $16,525 · EducationOhio Northern UniversityUniversity of Dayton: $13,175 · EducationUniversity of DaytonASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $9,375 · EducationASHLAND UNIVERSITYOtterbein University: $9,325 · EducationOtterbein UniversityWalsh University Inc: $7,825 · EducationWalsh University IncCedarville University: $5,500 · EducationCedarville UniversityMUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $2,825 · Education+11 more: $5,775 · Education+11 more
Other$176,700Education$70,325

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOhio Northern University: $16,525 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Dayton: $13,175 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $9,375 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOtterbein University: $9,325 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWalsh University Inc: $7,825 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCedarville University: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $2,825 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMarietta College: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE: $475 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMount Vernon Nazarene University: $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe University of Findlay: $325 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMALONE UNIVERSITY: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHeidelberg University: $175 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBaldwin Wallace University: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE ERIE COLLEGE: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Ohio Northern University ↗
  • Who funds University of Dayton ↗
  • Who funds ASHLAND UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Otterbein University ↗
  • Who funds Walsh University Inc ↗
  • Who funds Cedarville University ↗
  • Who funds MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ruth M Hughes Scholarship TrustOH24.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ruth M Hughes Scholarship Trust · The Ohio Foundation of Independent Colleges · Columbus Foundation · Clapper Scholarship Fund · Verna M Griffee Trust · Shelly Family Foundation · A K Stephenson Fdn Char Tr Agy · The Paul and Carol David Foundation · Coshocton Foundation · Council of Independent Colleges · Ann McConahay Educational Foundation · The Pearce Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ella Weiss Educational Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ella Weiss Educational Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ella Weiss Educational’s filings →

    More from the funding graph