Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ella Lyman Cabot Trust Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$169k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$258kHealth$195kInternational$145kEducation$122kYouth Development$116kFood & Nutrition$67kHuman Services$58kReligion$54kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $148k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$28,200
DOCTORS FOR GLOBAL HEALTH INC$27,118
Individual grant recipient$21,658
Individual grant recipient$11,250
GROUNDWORKS SOMERVILLE$10,000
TRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGE$10,000
REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT ASSISTANCE CENTER$10,000
NJ COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS$10,000
BOSTON COMMUNITY PEDIATRICS$10,000
NYC TOGETHER$10,000
Individual grant recipient$7,532
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
PRINCETON EINSTEIN MUSEUM INC$3,375
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 84% of grant dollars ($1.1M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 16% that went abroad ($204k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PINE STREET INN: $10k → 16%NJ COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $10k → 11%THE CHELSEA COLLABORATIVE INC: $13k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $10k → 16%THE ONE BY ONE PROJECT: $20k → 8%REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT ASSISTANCE CENTER: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
RI
CA
KY
VA
TN
NC
DC
OK
GA
TX

Beyond the US: 16% of all-years giving ($204k)

7 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Kenya$99k · 5 grants
Zimbabwe$27k · 2 grants
Uganda$25k · 1 grant
Zambia$23k · 1 grant
France$15k · 1 grant
Sweden$11k · 1 grant
Tanzania$4k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 26% of Ella Lyman Cabot Trust Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 40% of the giving stays in MA; by stated purpose, 28%.

Ella Lyman Cabot Trust Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 45% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

4%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$57k · 3 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
64

Total granted

$57k
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+16%

Still filing today

67%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $159k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalArts & CultureHealthCrime & LegalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2017–2018 · $22k
  • PINE STREET INN INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $20k · revenue +43%
  • Trustees of Tufts College
    2× · 2022–2025 · $15k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $44k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $44k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $37k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Brazilian Worker Center Inc

A grassroots, community organization that supports immigrants on issues of workplace rights and immigration. we work with the community, instructing them to execute their rights through organizing, advocacy, education, leadership, capacity…

Human Services
2
Political Asylumimmigration Representation Project Inc

To provide legal services to low income persons seeking political asylum and related relief from deportation in the new england area, as well as, promoting the rights of detained immigrants.

Crime & Legal
3
International Institute of New England Inc

For more than a century, the international institute of new england (iine) has been creating opportunities for refugees and immigrants to succeed through resettlement, education, career advancement, and pathways to citizenship. founded in…

Civil Rights
4
Neighborhealth Corporation

Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…

Health
5
Harvard Street Neighborhood Health Center Inc

Harvard street neighborhood health center serves as the primary health resource to our community, through the delivery of comprehensive patient-centered medical care.

Health
6
Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program Inc

The mission of the boston health care for the homeless program (bhchp) is to provide or assure access to the highest quality health care for all individuals and families experiencing homelessness in our community.

Human Services
7
La Comunidad Inc

Legal, immigration and community organizing

—
8
North End Community Health Committee

To operate a community health center providing a full range of health care services including medical, dental, vision, mental health and elder services to residents of the north end, charlestown and west end of boston, massachusetts.

Health
9
Project Citizenship Inc

Project citizenship is a nonprofit agency that provides free, high quality services to legal permanent residents to help them become u.s. citizens. project citizenship offers free workshops, eligibility screening, application assistance,…

Civil Rights
10
Tenants Development Corporation

The promotion, maintenance and management of housing in the south end of boston, massachusetts, to low and moderate-income families of every race, religion, and nationality.

Housing & Shelter
11
Co-Counsel Nyc Inc

To transform our collective capacity to navigate complex legal systems and support safe, thriving, and engaged immigrant communities.

Crime & Legal
12
Guernica Centre for InternationalJustice

The Guernica Centre for International Justice represents the interests of victims in national and international legal proceedings, putting in place transnational accountability strategies that seek to maximize the protection of victims'…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is N J Coalition to End Homelessness; the most unlike its peers is Princeton Einstein Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $44,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $43,873 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $37,340 · Other+62 more: $934,735 · Other+62 morePINE STREET INN INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE ONE BY ONE PROJECT INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesLA COLABORATIVA INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT ASSISTANCE CENTER: $10,000 · Human ServicesN J COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $10,000 · Human ServicesDOCTORS FOR GLOBAL HEALTH INC: $27,118 · InternationalCENTER FOR CONTEMPLATIVE JUSTICE: $15,359 · InternationalHEALING FOR HAITI INC: $10,000 · InternationalBOSTON AREA GLEANERS INC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionTHE CHARITY GUILD INC: $12,500 · Food & NutritionBOSTON COMMUNITY PEDIATRICS INC: $10,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF ASHA USA INC: $10,000 · HealthNYC Together Inc: $10,000 · Crime & LegalKIND INC: $10,000 · Crime & LegalTrustees of Tufts College: $15,000 · Education
Other$1,059,948Human Services$72,500International$52,477Food & Nutrition$32,500Health$20,000Crime & Legal$20,000Education$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDOCTORS FOR GLOBAL HEALTH INC: $27,118 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetBOSTON AREA GLEANERS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ONE BY ONE PROJECT INC: $20,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetCENTER FOR CONTEMPLATIVE JUSTICE: $15,359 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHARITY GUILD INC: $12,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetLA COLABORATIVA INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON COMMUNITY PEDIATRICS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFEATHERSTONE CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHEALING FOR HAITI INC: $10,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetFRIENDS OF ASHA USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetKIND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew England Piano Teachers Association Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetWOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRINCETON EINSTEIN MUSEUM INC: $3,375 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetBENEVOLENT FRATERNITY OF UNITARIAN CHURCHES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PERFORMANCE ZONE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DOCTORS FOR GLOBAL HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON AREA GLEANERS INC ↗
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ONE BY ONE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CONTEMPLATIVE JUSTICE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA17.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ella Lyman Cabot Trust Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ella Lyman Cabot Trust Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • La Colaborativa Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Boston Area Gleaners Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Groundwork Somerville Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc: 11% of income from government
  • The Charity Guild Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Boston Community Pediatrics Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Women's Lunch Place Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Refugee & Immigrant Assistance Center: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ella Lyman Cabot Trust Inc?

Find your warmest path to Ella Lyman Cabot Trust Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ella Lyman Cabot’s filings →

More from the funding graph