Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Elkes Foundation III

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
80
Grants FY2024still arriving
17
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Arts & Culture$964kEducation$889kYouth Development$714kEnvironment$522kHuman Services$427kRecreation & Sports$335kFood & Nutrition$263kHealth$257kOther$0
02FY2024 · 80 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k43 grants · $139k
  • $10k–50k34 grants · $697k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $210k
$7,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RIVERFEST FPS INC$80,000
Individual grant recipient$75,000
GRASSROOTS SOCCER$55,000
TEATOWN LAKE RESERVATION$43,150
JAMESON HUMANE$40,500
HUDSON RIVER SLOOP CLEARWATER INC$35,100
JACOB BURNS FILM CENTER$35,000
UKRAINIAN RESCUE HOME$30,000
READ TO GROW$30,000
BRONX LACROSSE$30,000
BERNIE'S BOOK BANK$30,000
PAJAMA PROGRAM$30,000
WRITING DOWNTOWN$30,000
FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES$25,000
SNACC$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $734k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%WHEELING FORWARD: $3k → 20%SPARE FOUNDATION: $500 → 12%WRITING DOWNTOWN: $35k → 10%WRITING DOWNTOWN: $40k → 13%YMCA OF SAN FRANCISCO: $5k → 8%WRITING DOWNTOWN: $30k → 13%GIVE US THE FLOOR: $7k → 10%CENTER FOR SAFETY AND CHANGE: $10k → 14%BOOK FAIRIES: $10k → 6%BOOK FAIRIES: $10k → 6%PAJAMA PROGRAM: $30k → 17%PAJAMA PROGRAM: $30k → 17%PAJAMA PROGRAM: $20k → 17%NEIGHBORS LINK: $3k → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK: $2k → 9%WESTCHESTER BLUE FOUNDATION: $150 → 9%OSSINING CHILDRENS CENTER: $3k → 9%OSSINING CHILDRENS CENTER: $3k → 9%OSSINING CHILDRENS CENTER: $1k → 9%YAMBA MALAWI: $1k → 17%FOR ALL SEASONS: $3k → 9%FOR ALL SEASONS: $3k → 9%FOR ALL SEASONS: $3k → 9%FOR ALL SEASONS: $3k → 9%FOR ALL SEASONS: $3k → 9%FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES: $100k → 17%FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES: $100k → 17%FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES: $100k → 17%FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES: $100k → 17%FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES: $50k → 17%FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
NV
WY
IA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.7M · 89 repeat orgs$886k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

89 repeat relationships — 49 still active in FY2024, 40 since wound down; 31 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

89
93

Total granted

$4.7M
$650k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+11%

Still filing today

65%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $236k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationHealthEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FY
    FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $475k · revenue +49%
  • TJ
    THE JAMES BEARD FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $198k · revenue +53%
  • PI
    PARENTCHILD INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $160k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • MH
    MARIN HEALTH FOUNDATIOBN
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • KB
    KING BAUDOUN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • RT
    READER TO READER
    one grant, 2019 · $30k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
5
The Paris Review Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…

Education
6
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
7
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
8
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
9
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Parentchild Inc and the most unlike its peers is Charlies Acres. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Community FoundationsElementary Literacy TutoringYouth Sports ProgramsIndependent K-12 SchoolsDance Arts OrganizationsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Policy Research and AdvocacyPregnancy Support ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Volunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Food Banks and PantriesCancer Support ServicesAnimal Rescue and ShelterCommunity College Foundatio…Domestic Violence ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Christian Missionary Organi…Community Arts CentersYouth Development ServicesLocal History Museums
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%5%<5yr14%9%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr19%24%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%7%<5yr14%12%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr19%37%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%11%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.8%1/134
the rest of the field
10%
11,857/120,626

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

124 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 124 of the 215 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
119/124
Grantees still filing
81/124
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE JAMES BEARD FOUNDATION INC — $197,500 · OtherTHE JAMES BEARD FOUNDATION INCREACH OUT READ OF GREATER NEW YORK — $190,000 · OtherREACH OUT READ OF GREATER NEW YORKGRINNELL COLLEGE — $175,000 · OtherGRINNELL COLLEGEPARENTCHILD INC — $160,000 · OtherPARENTCHILD INCMASCOMA VALLEY PRESERVATION — $156,000 · OtherTEATOWN LAKE RESERVATION INC — $144,400 · Other+132 more — $1,932,439 · Other+132 moreFRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC — $475,000 · Human ServicesFRESH YOUTH INI…Writing Downtown Inc — $105,000 · Human ServicesWriting Downtow…BEYOND BEDTIME INC — $80,000 · Human ServicesBEYOND BEDTIME …+12 more — $84,500 · Human Services+12 moreNEW LONDON BARN PLAYHOUSE INC — $120,000 · Arts & CultureNEW LONDON …JACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC — $102,000 · Arts & CultureJACOB BURNS…LINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $100,000 · Arts & CultureLINCOLN CEN…Sundance Institute — $70,210 · Arts & CultureSundance In…HISTORIC HUDSON VALLEY — $55,000 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC HU…ALL STARS PROJECT INC — $23,000 · Arts & CultureAndover House Inc — $20,000 · Arts & CultureStone Barns Restoration Corp DBA Stone Barns Center for Food & Agri — $20,000 · Arts & Culture+10 more — $65,000 · Arts & Culture+10 moreREAD TO GROW INC — $100,000 · EducationREAD TO GRO…President and Fellows of Middlebury College — $70,000 · EducationPresident a…THE LONG NOW FOUNDATION — $52,180 · EducationTHE LONG NO…The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations — $50,000 · EducationThe New Yor…HACKS HACKERS — $45,000 · EducationHACKS HACKE…BookSpring — $40,000 · EducationBookSpringKIDS NEED TO READ — $30,000 · EducationKIDS NEED T…Vanderbilt University — $30,000 · EducationVanderbilt …DUKE UNIVERSITY — $30,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVER…LITERACY INC — $20,000 · EducationLINK TO LIBRARIES INC — $20,000 · EducationREACH OUT AND READ INC — $20,000 · EducationCREATIVE COMMONS CORPORATION — $20,000 · Education+2 more — $20,000 · EducationGRASSROOT SOCCER INC — $272,500 · Recreation & SportsBRONX LACROSSE INC CO OTA — $57,500 · Recreation & Sports+2 more — $11,000 · Recreation & SportsHUDSON RIVER SLOOP CLEARWATER INC — $155,305 · EnvironmentRIVERFEST FPS INC — $80,000 · EnvironmentMADISON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $10,000 · Environment2041 FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $10,000 · Environment+4 more — $7,000 · EnvironmentBERNIE'S BOOK BANK — $150,000 · Youth DevelopmentBridge the Gap College Prep — $10,000 · Youth Development
Other$2,955,339Human Services$744,500Arts & Culture$575,210Education$547,180Recreation & Sports$341,000Environment$262,305Youth Development$160,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC — $475,000 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetGRASSROOT SOCCER INC — $272,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetTHE JAMES BEARD FOUNDATION INC — $197,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetPARENTCHILD INC — $160,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetMASCOMA VALLEY PRESERVATION — $156,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetHUDSON RIVER SLOOP CLEARWATER INC — $155,305 over 6y, 6.1% of budgetBERNIE'S BOOK BANK — $150,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTEATOWN LAKE RESERVATION INC — $144,400 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetNEW LONDON BARN PLAYHOUSE INC — $120,000 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetWriting Downtown Inc — $105,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetJACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC — $102,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetREAD TO GROW INC — $100,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJameson Animal Rescue Ranch — $83,600 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetBEYOND BEDTIME INC — $80,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetRIVERFEST FPS INC — $80,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF ROCHESTER INC — $80,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetSundance Institute — $70,210 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College — $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAIRBNBORG INC — $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBRONX LACROSSE INC CO OTA — $57,500 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetHISTORIC HUDSON VALLEY — $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LONG NOW FOUNDATION — $52,180 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations — $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Littlest Lamb — $45,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetHACKS HACKERS — $45,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetMARIN HUMANE SOCIETY — $42,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BATTERY FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBookSpring — $40,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetTHE ASIA SOCIETY — $36,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS NEED TO READ — $30,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetVanderbilt University — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD HUDSON PECONIC INC — $26,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSonoma County Grape Growers Foundation — $25,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetONE PURPOSE SCHOOL INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetALL STARS PROJECT INC — $23,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLITERACY INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLINK TO LIBRARIES INC — $20,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREADER TO READER INC — $20,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetREACH OUT AND READ INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCREATIVE COMMONS CORPORATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOOK FAIRIES INC — $20,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetStone Barns Restoration Corp DBA Stone Barns Center for Food & Agri — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCASHMERE FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 61% of budgetSTRINGS MUSIC FESTIVAL — $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUBI Charitable Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds GRASSROOT SOCCER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JAMES BEARD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PARENTCHILD INC ↗
  • Who funds MASCOMA VALLEY PRESERVATION ↗
  • Who funds HUDSON RIVER SLOOP CLEARWATER INC ↗
  • Who funds BERNIE'S BOOK BANK ↗
  • Who funds TEATOWN LAKE RESERVATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW LONDON BARN PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Writing Downtown Inc ↗
  • Who funds JACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds READ TO GROW INC ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Jameson Animal Rescue Ranch ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND BEDTIME INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVERFEST FPS INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF ROCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Sundance Institute ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Middlebury College ↗
  • Who funds AIRBNBORG INC ↗
  • Who funds BRONX LACROSSE INC CO OTA ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC HUDSON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds THE LONG NOW FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations ↗
  • Who funds The Littlest Lamb ↗
  • Who funds HACKS HACKERS ↗
  • Who funds MARIN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE BATTERY FOUNDATION ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The New York Communit…The Goldman Sachs Cha…Jewish Communal FundMarin Community Found…The Stanley S Langend…Jewish Community Fede…Webster Bank Charitab…Silicon Valley Commun…St Faith's House Foun…The Ayco Charitable F…Mbia FoundationPcsb Community Founda…
The New York Community TrustNY24.4× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Marin Community Foundation · The Stanley S Langendorf Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Webster Bank Charitable Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · St Faith's House Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Mbia Foundation · Pcsb Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Elkes Foundation III funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Reader to Reader Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College — 1% of income from government
  • Greenwich Hospital — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
36report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Elkes Foundation III?

Find your warmest path to Elkes Foundation III through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 215 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines