Skip to content
Elim Palmtrees Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Elim Palmtrees Inc

ELIM PALMTREES INC.

$121k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$442kHuman Services$110kInternational$40k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $103,700, the rows itemized in this filing. The $121,400 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $17,700 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
$10,200
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRINITY CHINESE CHURCH$80,000
SILVER LINING MISSIONS MILPITAS$10,200
CHINA OUTREACH$7,500
INHERIT INSTITUTE$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 53% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 7%CHINESE FOR CHRIST BIBLE INSTITUTE: $900 → 7%CHINA OUTREACH: $19k → 8%AMBASSADORS FOR CHRIST INC: $3k → 9%AMERICAN CHINESE OVERSEAS FOUNDATION: $14k → 8%STREAM OF PRAISE MUSIC MINISTRIES: $10k → 10%TRINITY CHINESE CHURCH: $90k → 5%DALLAS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $100k → 14%LDI FOUNDATION INC: $12k → 8%FOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $50k → 9%BETHEL RENEWAL: $31k → 4%CHINA OUTREACH: $10k → 8%SILVER LINING MISSIONS MILPITAS: $10k → 8%TRINITY CHINESE CHURCH: $80k → 5%DALLAS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $13k → 14%FOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $50k → 9%CHINA OUTREACH: $8k → 8%INHERIT INSTITUTE: $40k → 5%INHERIT INSTITUTE: $6k → 5%COLLIN COUNTY CHINESE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH: $8k → 5%INHERIT INSTITUTE: $11k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$502k · 6 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$502k
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+4%

Still filing today

67%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DT
    Dallas Theological Seminary
    2× · 2022–2023 · $113k · revenue +31%
  • CO
    CHINA OUTREACH MINISTRIESINC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $36k · revenue +2%
  • SC
    SILOAM CENTER
    2× · 2020–2022 · $25k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • BR
    BETHEL RENEWAL CENTER A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2022 · $31k · revenue +4%
  • AO
    AMERICAN OVERSEAS CHINESE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $14k · revenue +59%
  • LF
    LDI FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $12k · revenue -12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Institute of Chinese Studies

ChinsSource is a trusted partner and platform for educating the global church on critical issues facing the church and ministries in China and for connecting Christians inside and outside China to advance the kingdom of God globally

International
2
China Partner

Help churches in china fulfill the great commission through training emerging christian leaders. train leaders in evangelism, evangelistic preaching, pastoral care and leadership through seminaries and bible school in china. distribute…

—
3
Gospel Operation International for Chinese Christians

Our mission is to accomplish the Great Commission through the use of resources of Chinese churches worldwide in mission education, recruitment, training, missionary sending, and all other effective means in collaboration with the Global…

Religion
4
China Soul for Christ Foundation
Religion
5
Chinese Christian Life Fellowship Inc

To edify and make disciples of mainland china and overseas chinese christians to become devoted to only one great person: jesus christ the lord and savior and be motivated by only one greater purpose: building up his church for his glory

Religion
6
Chinese Overseas Christian Mission Inc

An evangelical interdenominational missionary society dedicated to reaching chinese for christ.

Religion
7
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
8
Christian Mission to the Orient

The organization is a missionary sending/sponsoring organizations that engage in Christian evangelism and training leaders for the churches in SE Asia

—
9
China Ministries International Inc

To spread and promote gospel and Christian faith to China

—
10
Chinese Christian Mission Inc

To reach out to the chinese worldwide in local evangelism and foreign missions. this purpose is facilitated through the use of missionaries, evangelism training and literature.

Religion
11
Chinese International Missions Inc

Spreading the gospel to chinese people around the world. preaching the gospel to the chinese people; sending mission workers into various countries; helping churches in the u.s. and abroad with a vision for world evangelism.

Religion
12
Vision for Asia

Christian Ministry Activities

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ambassadors for Christ Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Overseas Chinese Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRINITY CHINESE CHURCH: $170,000 · OtherTRINITY CHINESE CHURCHFOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $100,000 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILYCHINA OUTREACH MINISTRIESINC: $36,000 · OtherCHINA OUTREACH MINISTRIESINCBETHEL RENEWAL CENTER A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $31,075 · OtherBETHEL RENEWAL CENTER A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION+2 more: $8,900 · OtherDallas Theological Seminary: $113,400 · EducationDallas Theological Se…INHERIT INSTITUTE: $57,400 · ReligionINHERIT INSTITU…LDI FOUNDATION INC: $12,320 · ReligionLDI FOUNDATION …STREAM OF PRAISE MUSIC MINISTRIES: $10,000 · ReligionSTREAM OF PRAIS…AMBASSADORS FOR CHRIST INC: $3,200 · ReligionSILOAM CENTER: $25,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN OVERSEAS CHINESE FOUNDATION: $14,304 · InternationalSILVER LINING MISSIONS: $10,200 · Philanthropy
Other$345,975Education$113,400Religion$82,920Human Services$25,000International$14,304Philanthropy$10,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDallas Theological Seminary: $113,400 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetINHERIT INSTITUTE: $57,400 over 3y, 46% of budgetCHINA OUTREACH MINISTRIESINC: $36,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBETHEL RENEWAL CENTER A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $31,075 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetSILOAM CENTER: $25,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetLDI FOUNDATION INC: $12,320 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetSILVER LINING MISSIONS: $10,200 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSTREAM OF PRAISE MUSIC MINISTRIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMBASSADORS FOR CHRIST INC: $3,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase Founda…American Online Givin…Natl Christian Charit…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Elim Palmtrees Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elim Palmtrees Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Elim Palmtrees Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Elim Palmtrees Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Elim Palmtrees’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home