Skip to content
Eletreby Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Eletreby Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$194k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.3MReligion$265kCommunity Improvement$60kHuman Services$31kInternational$5kHealth$4k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW HORIZON IRVINE EDUCATIONAL FOUN$100,000
MPAC FOUNDATION$30,000
NEW HORIZON SCHOOL IRVINE$25,000
HEARTS OF MERCY$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
ORANGE COUNTY ISLAMIC FOUNDATION$3,000
ISLAMIC CENTER OF SOUTHERN CA$3,000
SABIL USA$2,500
NEW HORIZON LOS ANGELES$2,000
NEW HORIZON SCHOOL WLA$2,000
WISER$1,000
ISLAMIC CENTER OF YUMA$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 48% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%ISLAH LA: $3k → 14%SABIL USA: $3k → 10%SABIL USA: $3k → 10%SABIL USA: $3k → 10%AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 15 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +87% since the first grant, against -22% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
3

Total granted

$1.6M
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+87%
-22%

Still filing today

53%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    NEW HORIZON IRVINE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +102%
  • NH
    NEW HORIZON IRVINE SCHOOL
    4× · 2021–2025 · $100k · revenue +88%
  • NH
    NEW HORIZON SCHOOL PASADENA
    2× · 2021–2022 · $72k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • J
    JUSOOR
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -3%
  • IL
    ISLAH LA
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue -22%
  • IC
    ISLAMIC CENTER OF IRVINE INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue -46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
2
Islamic Society of San Francisco

Religious-mosque/masjid

—
3
Las Colinas Islamic Center
Religion
4
The Islamic Society of Southern California
Religion
5
Al-Zaharah Islamic Education Center
—
6
Islamic Center of Temecula Valley

To provide religious teaching and leadership for the muslim community of the temecula valley.

Religion
7
California Islamic Center

Islamic center

Education
8
Islamic Center of Petaluma

Islamic and community services

Religion
9
Foundation for Islamic Scholarship and Teaching
Education
10
Long Beach Islamic Center

Relegious Services

Religion
11
Kavkaz Islamic Center of California

Provides a suitable facility for the Muslim Community to worship and provide Islamic Religious service and education to the community and provide Islamic cultural environment

Religion
12
Sierra Community Center

Islamic Community Center offering place for worship and educational needs for both Muslim and non-Muslims

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Islamic Center of Southern California; the most unlike its peers is Jusoor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW HORIZON IRVINE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,083,000 · EducationNEW HORIZON IRVINE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONNEW HORIZON IRVINE SCHOOL: $100,000 · EducationNEW HORIZON IRVINE SCHOOLNEW HORIZON SCHOOL PASADENA: $72,000 · EducationNEW HORIZON SCHOOL PASADENA+1 more: $5,000 · EducationMPAC FOUNDATION: $205,000 · OtherMPAC FOUNDATIONHEARTS OF MERCY: $20,000 · OtherHEARTS OF MERCYIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant r…+5 more: $17,500 · Other+5 moreMUSLIM PUBLIC AFFAIRS COUNCIL: $70,772 · ReligionISLAMIC CENTER OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $28,500 · ReligionORANGE COUNTY ISLAMIC FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Religion+1 more: $1,000 · ReligionSabil USA: $7,500 · Human ServicesAIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Human ServicesISLAH LA: $3,000 · Human Services
Education$1,260,000Other$262,500Religion$115,272Human Services$14,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW HORIZON IRVINE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,083,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetNEW HORIZON IRVINE SCHOOL: $100,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNEW HORIZON SCHOOL PASADENA: $72,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetMUSLIM PUBLIC AFFAIRS COUNCIL: $70,772 over 3y, 37% of budgetISLAMIC CENTER OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $28,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetORANGE COUNTY ISLAMIC FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSabil USA: $7,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJUSOOR: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetISLAH LA: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetISLAMIC CENTER OF IRVINE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW HORIZON IRVINE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW HORIZON IRVINE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NEW HORIZON SCHOOL PASADENA ↗
  • Who funds MUSLIM PUBLIC AFFAIRS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds ISLAMIC CENTER OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds ORANGE COUNTY ISLAMIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Sabil USA ↗
  • Who funds JUSOOR ↗
  • Who funds AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ISLAH LA ↗
  • Who funds ISLAMIC CENTER OF IRVINE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Edwards Lifesciences …American Muslim Commu…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Edwards Lifesciences FoundationCA15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · American Muslim Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eletreby Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eletreby Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Eletreby Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Eletreby Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Eletreby’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home