Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Eleanor's Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$200k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What you fund
0186% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$602kAnimals$515kHuman Services$344kFood & Nutrition$300kRecreation & Sports$80kYouth Development$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kArts & Culture$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $180k
$70,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION$110,000
MAKE-A-WISH SOUTH DAKOTA$70,000
SAFARI CLUB INTERNAT FOUNDATION$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WESTERN SPORTS FOUNDATION: $20k → 15%WESTERN SPORTS FOUNDATION: $20k → 15%WESTERN SPORTS FOUNDATION: $20k → 15%WESTERN SPORTS FOUNDATION: $20k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 14 repeat orgs$185k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
6

Total granted

$1.8M
$185k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+131%

Still filing today

43%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionAnimalsPublic Safety & DisasterHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SOUTH DAKOTA & MONTANA
    7× · 2017–2025 · $500k · revenue +53%
  • WS
    WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2025 · $335k · revenue +57%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF SOUTH DAKOTA
    5× · 2017–2021 · $100k · revenue +85%

Funded once

  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION FOR NA WILD SHEEP
    one grant, 2023 · $80k
  • SD
    SOUTH DAKOTA AGRICULTURAL FOUND
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • CC
    CHILDREN'S CARE HOSPITAL AND SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +175%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
2
Lifescape Foundation

The mission of the lifescape foundation is to provide resources to enhance the lives of children and adults served by lifescape. we do this through direct support of therapy, education, supported living and employment programs, and helping…

Health
3
Linton Hospital

The mission of Linton Hospital and Clinics is to enhance the health, well-being, and quality of life of the people we serve.

Health
4
Catholic Charities North Dakota

Guided by our values, Catholic Charities North Dakota serves people in need and advocates for the common good of all.

5
West Fargo Rural Fire Department

Fire Protection

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

7
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
8
Winona Health Foundation

The mission of the Winona Health Foundation is to gather, steward, and distribute resources needed to support and advance the mission of Winona Health and its affiliates.

Health
9
Downtown Sioux Falls

Downtown Sioux Falls boldly leads the downtown community by championing diverse experiences, economic growth, and a healthy environment.

10
Colorado State Fire Chiefs

The vision of the csfc is to partner with the fire service and supplier partners across the state of colorado in their efforts to protect all of colorado's life and property from fire and other disasters. it is a dynamic organization,…

Public Safety & Disaster
11
North Dakota State University Foundation

Building enduring relationships that maximize advocacy and philanthropy to support North Dakota State University.

Education
12
Sd Association of Healthcare Organizations

Advancing healthy communities through a unified voice across the health care continuum.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of South Dakota & Montana and the most unlike its peers is Enning Fire Department Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SOUTH DAKOTA & MONTANA — $500,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SOUTH DAKOTA & MONTANASOUTH DAKOTA AGRICULTURAL FOUNDATIO — $150,000 · OtherSOUTH DAKOTA AGRICULTURAL FOUNDATIOMAKE-A-WISH SOUTH DAKOTA MONTANA — $144,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH SOUTH DAKOTA MONTANASAFARI CLUB INTERNAT FOUNDATION — $100,000 · OtherSAFARI CLUB INTERNAT FOUNDATIONTHE FOUNDATION FOR NA WILD SHEEP — $80,000 · OtherTHE FOUNDATION FOR NA WILD SHEEPRAPID CITY SHRINE CLUB — $50,000 · OtherSOUTH DAKOTA AGRICULTURAL FOUND — $50,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD CHARITIES — $50,000 · OtherSD YOUTH HUNTING ADVENTURES — $50,000 · Other+5 more — $90,000 · Other+5 moreWILD SHEEP FOUNDATION — $335,000 · AnimalsWILD SHEEP FOUNDATI…CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF SOUTH DAKOTA — $100,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S…Western Sports Foundation — $80,000 · Human ServicesWestern Sp…FEEDING SOUTH DAKOTA — $100,000 · Food & NutritionLIFESCAPE — $62,000 · HealthENNING FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $10,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$1,264,000Animals$335,000Human Services$180,000Food & Nutrition$100,000Health$62,000Public Safety & Disaster$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SOUTH DAKOTA & MONTANA — $500,000 over 7y, 5.0% of budgetWILD SHEEP FOUNDATION — $335,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF SOUTH DAKOTA — $100,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH DAKOTA — $100,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWestern Sports Foundation — $80,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetLIFESCAPE — $62,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S CARE HOSPITAL AND SCHOOL — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDays Of '76 Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SOUTH DAKOTA & MONTANA
  • Who funds WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF SOUTH DAKOTA
  • Who funds FEEDING SOUTH DAKOTA
  • Who funds Western Sports Foundation
  • Who funds LIFESCAPE
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CARE HOSPITAL AND SCHOOL
  • Who funds ENNING FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
  • Who funds Days Of '76 Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Interstate BancSystem Foundation IncMT15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Sanford Group Return · Midcontinent Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Eleanor's Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph