Skip to content
Eleanor P Stuart & Mary C Stuart Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Eleanor P Stuart & Mary C Stuart Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$71k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Animals$257kHuman Services$148k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOLDEN PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC$40,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF COLLIER CO$7,500
PET PARTNERS$7,500
PILOT DOGS$5,000
RESCUE 22 FOUNDATION$3,500
INTERNATIONAL HEARING DOG INC$3,500
ATLAS ASSISTANCE DOGS$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $161k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $20k → 10%INTERNATIONAL HEARING DOG INC: $4k → 10%PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $20k → 10%INTERNATIONAL HEARING DOG INC: $4k → 10%INTERNATIONAL HEARING DOG INC: $4k → 10%INTERNATIONAL HEARING DOG INC: $3k → 10%GOLDEN PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $40k → 10%PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $28k → 10%PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $20k → 10%PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $20k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MA
OR
OH
NJ
CA
CO
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$404k · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$404k
$0

Still filing today

91%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GP
    Golden PAWS Assistance Dogs Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $148k · revenue +96%
  • PATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +63%
  • PD
    PILOT DOGS ALLOWAY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $43k · revenue +266%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    A Cause to Give Us Paws

    Service Dog training for Disabled Veterans

    Animals
    2
    No Dogs Left Behind
    Animals
    3
    Pawsitive Pawsibilities

    To purchase and train service dogs for disabled individuals

    Animals
    4
    Pawsitivity

    Train and place service dogs at no cost with U.S. military veterans with PTSD and other disabilities to increase independence.

    Human Services
    5
    Patriot Paws Service Dogs

    To train and provide service dogs of the highest quality at no cost to disabled american veterans and others with mobile disabilities in order to help restore their physical and emotional independence.

    Human Services
    6
    Hero Dogs Inc

    Hero Dogs improves the quality of life of our nations heroes and enhances the services of community organizations by placing assistance dogs with customized training & lifetime support.

    Human Services
    7
    Fidos for Freedom Inc

    To provide quality trained assistance dogs for mobility-challenged individuals, hearing-impaired individuals and veterans with combat related ptsd.

    —
    8
    The Adoptable Dog
    Animals
    9
    Pet Helpers
    Animals
    10
    Circle Tail Inc

    The mission of circle tail is to empower, educate, and inspire individuals and communities through professional training and partnership of highly-ski

    Human Services
    11
    Joys of Living Assistance Dogs

    We are dedicated to raising and training assistance dogs and placing them in positions of service. our mission is to provide a skilled, devoted companion to support and assist a person living with disabilities - creating a chohesive team…

    —
    12
    Helping Paws Inc

    Helping paws, inc. furthers people's independence and quality of life through the use of assistance dogs.

    Human Services
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canine Companions for Independence Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Assistance Dog United Campaign. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    6
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    10/10
    Grantees still filing
    8/10
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    Golden PAWS Assistance Dogs Inc: $147,500 · Human ServicesGolden PAWS Assistance Dogs IncCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $37,500 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INCPARAGON SERVICE DOGS: $13,000 · Human ServicesPARAGON SERVICE DOGSPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC: $50,000 · AnimalsPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INCPET PARTNERS: $45,000 · AnimalsPET PARTNERSThe Assistance Dog United Campaign: $15,000 · AnimalsThe Assistance Dog United CampaignATLAS ASSISTANCE DOGS: $13,000 · AnimalsATLAS ASSISTANCE DOGSRESCUE 22 FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 · AnimalsRESCUE 22 FOUNDATION INCDOGS FOR THE DEAF INC DBA DOGS FOR BETTER LIVES: $5,000 · AnimalsPILOT DOGS ALLOWAY: $42,500 · OtherPILOT DOGS ALLOWAYHELPING HANDS: $22,500 · OtherHELPING HANDS
    Human Services$198,000Animals$141,000Other$65,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGolden PAWS Assistance Dogs Inc: $147,500 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC: $50,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPET PARTNERS: $45,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPILOT DOGS ALLOWAY: $42,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $37,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Assistance Dog United Campaign: $15,000 over 2y, 94% of budgetATLAS ASSISTANCE DOGS: $13,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetRESCUE 22 FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetPARAGON SERVICE DOGS: $13,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetDOGS FOR THE DEAF INC DBA DOGS FOR BETTER LIVES: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Morgan Stanley Global…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
    Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Eleanor P Stuart & Mary C Stuart Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eleanor P Stuart & Mary C Stuart Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      4get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Eleanor P Stuart & Mary C Stuart Family Foundation?

      Find your warmest path to Eleanor P Stuart & Mary C Stuart Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Eleanor P Stuart & Mary C Stuart Family’s filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home