Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Eleanor P Stuart & Mary C Stuart Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$71k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Animals$257kHuman Services$148k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOLDEN PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC$40,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF COLLIER CO$7,500
PET PARTNERS$7,500
PILOT DOGS$5,000
RESCUE 22 FOUNDATION$3,500
ATLAS ASSISTANCE DOGS$3,500
INTERNATIONAL HEARING DOG INC$3,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $161k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $20k → 10%INTERNATIONAL HEARING DOG INC: $4k → 10%PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $20k → 10%INTERNATIONAL HEARING DOG INC: $4k → 10%INTERNATIONAL HEARING DOG INC: $4k → 10%INTERNATIONAL HEARING DOG INC: $3k → 10%GOLDEN PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $40k → 10%PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $28k → 10%PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $20k → 10%PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $20k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MA
OR
OH
NJ
CA
CO
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$404k · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$404k
$0

Still filing today

91%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GP
    Golden PAWS Assistance Dogs Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $148k · revenue +156%
  • PATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +63%
  • PD
    PILOT DOGS ALLOWAY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $43k · revenue +266%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    A Cause to Give Us Paws

    Service Dog training for Disabled Veterans

    Animals
    2
    No Dogs Left Behind
    Animals
    3
    Pawsitive Pawsibilities

    To purchase and train service dogs for disabled individuals

    Animals
    4
    Pawsitivity

    Train and place service dogs at no cost with U.S. military veterans with PTSD and other disabilities to increase independence.

    Human Services
    5
    Patriot Paws Service Dogs

    To train and provide service dogs of the highest quality at no cost to disabled american veterans and others with mobile disabilities in order to help restore their physical and emotional independence.

    Human Services
    6
    Hero Dogs Inc

    Hero Dogs improves the quality of life of our nations heroes and enhances the services of community organizations by placing assistance dogs with customized training & lifetime support.

    Human Services
    7
    Fidos for Freedom Inc

    To provide quality trained assistance dogs for mobility-challenged individuals, hearing-impaired individuals and veterans with combat related ptsd.

    8
    The Adoptable Dog
    Animals
    9
    Pet Helpers
    Animals
    10
    Circle Tail Inc

    The mission of circle tail is to empower, educate, and inspire individuals and communities through professional training and partnership of highly-ski

    Human Services
    11
    Joys of Living Assistance Dogs

    We are dedicated to raising and training assistance dogs and placing them in positions of service. our mission is to provide a skilled, devoted companion to support and assist a person living with disabilities - creating a chohesive team…

    12
    Helping Paws Inc

    Helping paws, inc. furthers people's independence and quality of life through the use of assistance dogs.

    Human Services

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canine Companions for Independence Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Assistance Dog United Campaign. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    6
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    10/10
    Grantees still filing
    8/10
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    Golden PAWS Assistance Dogs Inc — $147,500 · Human ServicesGolden PAWS Assistance Dogs IncCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $37,500 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INCPARAGON SERVICE DOGS — $13,000 · Human ServicesPARAGON SERVICE DOGSPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC — $50,000 · AnimalsPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INCPET PARTNERS — $45,000 · AnimalsPET PARTNERSThe Assistance Dog United Campaign — $15,000 · AnimalsThe Assistance Dog United CampaignATLAS ASSISTANCE DOGS — $13,000 · AnimalsATLAS ASSISTANCE DOGSRESCUE 22 FOUNDATION INC — $13,000 · AnimalsRESCUE 22 FOUNDATION INCDOGS FOR THE DEAF INC DBA DOGS FOR BETTER LIVES — $5,000 · AnimalsPILOT DOGS ALLOWAY — $42,500 · OtherPILOT DOGS ALLOWAYHELPING HANDS — $22,500 · OtherHELPING HANDS
    Human Services$198,000Animals$141,000Other$65,000

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGolden PAWS Assistance Dogs Inc — $147,500 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC — $50,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPET PARTNERS — $45,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPILOT DOGS ALLOWAY — $42,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $37,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Assistance Dog United Campaign — $15,000 over 2y, 94% of budgetATLAS ASSISTANCE DOGS — $13,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetRESCUE 22 FOUNDATION INC — $13,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetPARAGON SERVICE DOGS — $13,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetDOGS FOR THE DEAF INC DBA DOGS FOR BETTER LIVES — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Eleanor P Stuart & Mary C Stuart Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      4get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Eleanor P Stuart & Mary C Stuart Family Foundation?

      Find your warmest path to Eleanor P Stuart & Mary C Stuart Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph