Skip to content

· Private foundation

Eleanor Crook Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10M
Granted FY2024still arriving
46
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$18MFood & Nutrition$6.5MHealth$3.1MCommunity Improvement$876kEnvironment$737kSocial Science$696kPublic Benefit$510kPhilanthropy$440kOther$0
02FY2024 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $170k
  • $50k–250k25 grants · $2.8M
  • $250k+14 grants · $7.2M
$122,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$83M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC$1,614,349
ACTION AGAINST HUNGER$794,558
LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE$742,542
ALLIANCE TO END MALNUTRITION AND HUNGER LIMITED (UK GBP)$686,606
COALITION FOR GLOBAL PROSPERITY$527,169
ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL$449,340
ASPEN INSTITUTE$375,000
THE GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC$350,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE INC$346,840
HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL$272,933
INTERNATIONAL CONSERVATION CAUCUS FOUNDATION$271,260
UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC$259,275
MANA NUTRITION$250,000
DIMAGI$250,000
Individual grant recipient$245,617
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 71% of grant dollars ($23M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 29% that went abroad ($9.6M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $788k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PATH: $10k → 12%CENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT: $225k → 14%CENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT: $175k → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM: $165k → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM: $157k → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAMME: $56k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
RI
CA
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 29% of all-years giving ($9.6M)

8 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$5.8M · 32 grants
Switzerland$1.7M · 8 grants
Uganda$804k · 12 grants
France$590k · 5 grants
Canada$390k · 5 grants
Ireland$162k · 3 grants
Italy$83k · 1 grant
Ethiopia$44k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 15% of Eleanor Crook Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Eleanor Crook Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 47% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$25M · 48 repeat orgs$5.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

48 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
45

Total granted

$25M
$3.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+2%

Still filing today

46%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +10%
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    4× · 2020–2023 · $1.7M · revenue +46%
  • BF
    Bread for the World Institute
    4× · 2017–2021 · $1.2M · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • AU
    ALIMA USA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $750k · revenue -24%
  • LS
    LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE & TROPICAL
    one grant, 2020 · $347k
  • HT
    HOPE THROUGH HEALING HANDS
    one grant, 2018 · $240k · revenue -89% · 50% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
2
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
3
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
4
Global Communities

Global communities brings together local ingenuity and global insights to save lives and secure strong futures.

International
5
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
6
Partnersglobal

Partnersglobal (partners) works through a global network to support local leaders and create partnerships that transform conflict, strengthen democratic institutions, and achieve sustainable development.

International
7
International Budget Partnership

Ibp works with civil society, governments, international institutions and the private sector to bring about a world in which empowered citizens participate in open, inclusive public budgeting processes to shape policies and practices that…

International
8
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
9
Gardens for Health International

Gardens for Health International works to provide lasting agricultural solutions to chronic childhood malnutrition

International
10
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
11
Nuru International

Nuru is a global collective that enables inclusive and sustainable prosperity by identifying communities at the stability tipping point, strengthening rural livelihoods and market systems, and fostering stabilizing connections that repair…

International
12
Handicap International

Handicap international dba humanity & inclusion (hi) works with people with disabilities and people living in situations of vulnerability, including poverty, exclusion, conflict, and disaster.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Action Against Hunger - Usa; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 120 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/53
Grantees still filing
30/53
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $2,312,145 · InternationalUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INCTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $2,134,907 · InternationalTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONALCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC: $1,749,819 · InternationalCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INCUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,742,699 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFBread for the World Institute: $1,158,530 · InternationalBread for the World InstituteCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $959,083 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INCACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA: $954,558 · InternationalACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USAALIMA USA INC: $750,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $615,735 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC: $573,339 · International+18 more: $2,295,752 · International+18 moreIndividual grant recipient: $1,536,209 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE: $1,470,799 · OtherLONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINEWORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION: $988,800 · OtherWORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATIONALLIANCE TO END MALNUTRITION AND HUNGER LIMITED (UK GBP): $944,952 · OtherALLIANCE TO END MALNUTRITION AND HUNGER LIMITED (…COALITION FOR GLOBAL PROSPERITY: $766,453 · OtherCOALITION FOR GLOBAL PROSPERITYSIGHT AND LIFE FOUNDATION: $711,250 · Other1000 DAYS: $575,000 · OtherCENTER FOR US GLOBAL LEADERSHIP (CUSGLC): $530,000 · Other+72 more: $6,709,946 · Other+72 moreAlliance to End Hunger: $565,453 · Food & NutritionEDESIA INC: $250,000 · Food & NutritionCENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT: $399,657 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $377,930 · Human Services+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $670,000 · Social ScienceNEW VENTURE FUND: $305,000 · EnvironmentINTERNATIONAL CONSERVATION CAUCUS FOUNDATION: $271,260 · EnvironmentRESULTS EDUCATIONAL FUND INC: $230,000 · EducationMicronutrient Forum: $146,538 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $65,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $41,000 · Education
International$15,246,567Other$14,233,409Food & Nutrition$815,453Human Services$787,587Social Science$670,000Environment$576,260Education$482,538

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $2,312,145 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $2,134,907 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC: $1,749,819 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,742,699 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBread for the World Institute: $1,158,530 over 4y, 8.5% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $959,083 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA: $954,558 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetALIMA USA INC: $750,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $670,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $615,735 over 4y, 0.0% of budget1000 DAYS: $575,000 over 4y, 61% of budgetFOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC: $573,339 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAlliance to End Hunger: $565,453 over 5y, 7.4% of budgetHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $501,302 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT: $399,657 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $377,930 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $350,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $305,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CONSERVATION CAUCUS FOUNDATION: $271,260 over 1y, 10% of budgetEDESIA INC: $250,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE THROUGH HEALING HANDS: $240,350 over 1y, 50% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $236,667 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRESULTS EDUCATIONAL FUND INC: $230,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetPROJECT CONCERN INTERNATIONAL: $206,993 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetINTERACTION THE AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR VOLUNTARY INT'L ACTION INC: $200,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTHE INT'L CENTER FOR JOURNALISTS INC: $193,111 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetThe ONE Campaign: $175,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCenter for US Global Leadership: $170,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetMicronutrient Forum: $146,538 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetCONCERN WORLDWIDE (US) INC: $127,679 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGlobal Response Management Inc: $110,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetEcoHealth Alliance Inc: $80,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetRESULTS FOR DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $65,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES: $60,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONCORDIA SUMMIT INC: $55,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLegacy Global Programs: $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE HALO TRUST (USA) INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTRAHEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $41,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Global FoodBanking Network: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPan American Health Service Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetLAST MILE HEALTH: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTRIANGLE GLOBAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM INC: $23,900 over 1y, 12% of budgetLAWYERS FOR GOOD GOVERNMENT INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetREFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPATH - PEOPLE ATTEMPTING TO HELP: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds Bread for the World Institute ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA ↗
  • Who funds ALIMA USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds 1000 DAYS ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC ↗
  • Who funds Alliance to End Hunger ↗
  • Who funds HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CONSERVATION CAUCUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EDESIA INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE THROUGH HEALING HANDS ↗
  • Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS ↗
  • Who funds RESULTS EDUCATIONAL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT CONCERN INTERNATIONAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gates FoundationWA42.5× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gates Foundation · The Rockefeller Foundation · New Venture Fund · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Path · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Clear Fund · Family Health International Inc · Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eleanor Crook Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eleanor Crook Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 24%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals: 67% of income from government
  • EcoHealth Alliance Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Eleanor Crook Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Eleanor Crook Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 120 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eleanor Crook’s filings →

More from the funding graph