Skip to content

· Private foundation

Eleanor Cray Cottle Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$56k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$89kEducation$80kHealth$70kInternational$64kArts & Culture$51kHuman Services$16kHousing & Shelter$10kAnimals$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Wildlands Trust$10,000
Dana Farber Cance Research Institute$7,000
WGBH$5,000
St Vincent de Paul's$5,000
Doctors Without Borders$4,000
Pine Street Inn$4,000
Rosie's Place$4,000
Alzheimer's Association$3,000
Plympton Teachers Assoc$3,000
NPR$2,000
CARE Gift Center$2,000
Plymouth Public Library$2,000
Project Hope$2,000
Save the Children$1,000
Black Feather Horse Rescue$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Pine Street Inn: $4k → 16%Pine Street Inn: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
CT
CA
VA
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$347k · 21 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
13

Total granted

$347k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+3%

Still filing today

62%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEnvironmentHealthEducationHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WT
    WILDLANDS TRUST INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $72k · revenue +34%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $62k · revenue +162%
  • PP
    Plymouth Public Library Corporation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • DS
    Dexter School
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • SS
    ST SEBASTIANS SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • CS
    Cretin-Derham School
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
3
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
4
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
5
Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc

To protect the nature of massachusetts for people and for wildlife through education, land conservation, advocacy, scientific research, and habitat stewardship/restoration.

Environment
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
8
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
9
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
10
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
11
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
12
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wildlands Trust Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WGBH: $32,000 · OtherWGBHDennett Elementary School: $24,000 · OtherDennett Elementary SchoolPROJECT H O P E INC: $12,000 · OtherPROJECT H O P E INCBlack Feather Horse Rescue: $8,000 · OtherBlack Feather Horse RescueSt Vincent de Paul's: $8,000 · OtherSt Vincent de Paul'sSt Vincent's De Paul: $7,075 · OtherDana Farber Cance Research Institute: $7,000 · OtherDexter School: $5,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherST SEBASTIANS SCHOOL INC: $5,000 · Other+13 more: $27,000 · Other+13 moreWILDLANDS TRUST INC: $72,000 · EnvironmentWILDLANDS TRUST INCAppalachian Mountain Club: $8,000 · EnvironmentAppalachian Mountain Cl…SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $3,000 · EnvironmentDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $62,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer I…BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INC: $6,000 · HealthBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $3,000 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $16,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SAN…COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $14,000 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE …Save The Children Federation Inc: $12,000 · InternationalSave The Chi…PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · InternationalPlymouth Public Library Corporation: $21,000 · EducationDEXTER SOUTHFIELD INC: $8,500 · EducationWGBH Educational Foundation: $16,000 · Arts & CultureROSIE'S PLACE INC: $4,000 · Housing & ShelterLOWELL TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER INC: $3,000 · Housing & ShelterPINE STREET INN INC: $6,000 · Human Services
Other$145,075Environment$83,000Health$71,000International$44,000Education$29,500Arts & Culture$16,000Housing & Shelter$7,000Human Services$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWILDLANDS TRUST INC: $72,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $62,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPlymouth Public Library Corporation: $21,000 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $16,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWGBH Educational Foundation: $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $14,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $12,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDEXTER SOUTHFIELD INC: $8,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAppalachian Mountain Club: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOWELL TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST SEBASTIAN SCHOOL FUND INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WILDLANDS TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds Plymouth Public Library Corporation ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WGBH Educational Foundation ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds DEXTER SOUTHFIELD INC ↗
  • Who funds Appalachian Mountain Club ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INC ↗
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds LOWELL TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST SEBASTIAN SCHOOL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank FoundationMA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eleanor Cray Cottle Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eleanor Cray Cottle Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Bridge Over Troubled Waters Inc: 32% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Wildlands Trust Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Appalachian Mountain Club: 1% of income from government
  • Wgbh Educational Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Eleanor Cray Cottle Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Eleanor Cray Cottle Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eleanor Cray Cottle’s filings →

More from the funding graph