Skip to content

· Private foundation

Elam Alexander Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$117k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Youth Development$254kArts & Culture$228kReligion$82kEducation$81kHuman Services$80kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $71k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MENTOR'S PROJECT$22,000
MUSEUM OF ARTS AND SCIENCES$20,000
MOTIVATING YOUTH FOUNDATION INC$15,000
CAMPUS CLUB$14,000
HAY HOUSE$6,000
MOTIVATING YOUTH ADULT READINESS$5,000
MACON ARTS ALLIANCE$5,000
FIRST TEE$5,000
MIDDLE GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOU$5,000
WESLEYAN COLLEGE$5,000
NUTCRACKER OF MIDDLE GEORGIA$5,000
OTIS REDDING FOUNDATION$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
THE CANNONBALL HOUSE$2,000
MORNING MUSIC CLUB$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 23%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 23%THE ARC MACON: $15k → 23%THE ARC MACON: $10k → 23%THE ARC MACON: $5k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$716k · 16 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
2

Total granted

$716k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+55%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationReligionRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CAMPUS CLUBS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $82k · revenue +37%
  • MY
    MOTIVATING YOUTH FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $81k · revenue +3%
  • MA
    MACON ARTS ALLIANCE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $44k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • MP
    MENTORS PROJECT OF BIBB COUNTY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +55%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Middle Georgia Art Association Inc

To foster interest in fine art in macon ga

—
2
The Macon County Art Association

Providing a collective for all visual artists in franklin, macon county and the surrounding areas; promoting art and art appreciation through education and exibition; supporting the work of artists and art endeavors; supporting the work of…

—
3
Montgomery Art Center Inc

To promote art in the community which includes providing a space where artists can work and teach and students can take lessons and artists can exhibit their art

Arts & Culture
4
Macon Economic Development Commission Inc

To promote economic development.

—
5
Macon Symphony Orchestra Inc

To stage concerts for the benefit of the public.

—
6
Midsouth Music Institute Aka CoroRio
Arts & Culture
7
Macon County Farm Bureau Foundation

To provide scholarships and promote ag education.

Food & Nutrition
8
Macon County Fair Association

County fair

—
9
Musically Minded Inc

Music education

Arts & Culture
10
Georgia Music Accord Inc

To bring a grammy museum and educational programs to georgia.

Arts & Culture
11
Literacy Council of Macon County

Family literacy education

—
12
Music Carolina

To provide small ensemble chamber music perfs

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Macon Arts Alliance Inc; the most unlike its peers is Nutcracker of Middle Georgia Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MENTOR'S PROJECT: $110,000 · OtherMENTOR'S PROJECTMOTIVATING YOUTH ADULT READINESS: $48,000 · OtherMOTIVATING YOUTH ADULT READINESSTHE METHODIST HOME: $31,000 · OtherTHE METHODIST HOMEMIDDLE GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOU: $30,000 · OtherMIDDLE GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientALEXANDER II MAGNET SCHOOL: $19,800 · OtherALEXANDER II MAGNET SCHOOLHAY HOUSE: $19,000 · OtherHAY HOUSE+3 more: $23,000 · Other+3 moreMUSEUM OF ARTS & SCIENCES INC: $137,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF ARTS & SCIENCES INCMACON ARTS ALLIANCE INC: $44,000 · Arts & CultureMACON ARTS ALLIANCE INCNUTCRACKER OF MIDDLE GEORGIA INC: $29,000 · Arts & CultureNUTCRACKER OF MIDDLE GEORGIA IN…+1 more: $3,000 · Arts & CultureCAMPUS CLUBS INC: $82,000 · ReligionCAMPUS CLUBS…MOTIVATING YOUTH FOUNDATION INC: $81,000 · Recreation & SportsMOTIVATING Y…WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $31,000 · EducationTHE MORNING MUSIC CLUB: $6,000 · EducationTHE ARC MACON INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesMENTORS PROJECT OF BIBB COUNTY INC: $15,000 · Youth Development
Other$300,800Arts & Culture$213,000Religion$82,000Recreation & Sports$81,000Education$37,000Human Services$30,000Youth Development$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMUSEUM OF ARTS & SCIENCES INC: $137,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetCAMPUS CLUBS INC: $82,000 over 7y, 4.7% of budgetMOTIVATING YOUTH FOUNDATION INC: $81,000 over 7y, 11% of budgetMACON ARTS ALLIANCE INC: $44,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetWESLEYAN COLLEGE: $31,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC MACON INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNUTCRACKER OF MIDDLE GEORGIA INC: $29,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetTHE MORNING MUSIC CLUB: $6,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MUSEUM OF ARTS & SCIENCES INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMPUS CLUBS INC ↗
  • Who funds MOTIVATING YOUTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MACON ARTS ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds WESLEYAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC MACON INC ↗
  • Who funds NUTCRACKER OF MIDDLE GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds MENTORS PROJECT OF BIBB COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MORNING MUSIC CLUB ↗
  • Who funds OTIS REDDING FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Griffith Family Foundation IncGA24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Griffith Family Foundation Inc · The Peyton Anderson Foundation · Ej Grassmann Trust · John S and James L Knight Foundation · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · James Hyde Porter Testamentary Trust · Martin Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Elam Alexander Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elam Alexander Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Elam Alexander’s filings →

    More from the funding graph