Skip to content
Eisen Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Eisen Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$52kYouth Development$4kHuman Services$4kEducation$3kInternational$2kEnvironment$2kFood & Nutrition$1kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$66k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Indian Creek Foundation$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SUNRISE DAY CAMP ASSN: $500 → 6%Sunrise Association: $250 → 6%FACE TO FACE: $2k → 22%BANCROFT NEUROHEALTH: $325 → 12%BANCROFT NEUROHEALTH: $315 → 12%BANCROFT NEUROHEALTH: $250 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
PA
NJ
KY
MD
AR
SC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$58k · 8 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
30

Total granted

$58k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+23%

Still filing today

100%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    INDIAN CREEK FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $48k · revenue +50%
  • LO
    LUCY OUTREACH A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4k · revenue +308%
  • RU
    ROWAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • DW
    DEEEP WELL PROJECT
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • FT
    FACE TO FACE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +40%
  • Feeding America
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
2
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
3
Marrakech Inc

Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…

Employment
4
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
5
Adelphi University

Adelphi university is dedicated to transforming students' lives through small classes, hands-on learning and innovative programs supporting academic and career success.

Education
6
Long Island Community Hospital At Nyu Langone Health

The goals and objectives of the corporation are as follows:(a) to operate and maintain a nonsectarian, general hospital at one or more locations for the furnishing of inpatient, ambulatory, restorative, preventative and emergency medical…

—
7
The Child Center of Ny Inc

The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.

—
8
Lift Inc

Lift's mission is to break the cycle of poverty by investing in parents. we build families' well-being, financial strength, and social connections to lift two generations at once.

Employment
9
Luminis Health Inc

Support and encourage quality health care, medical, and related services across anne arundel, prince george's, calvert, queen anne's, and talbot and kent counties, by among other activities, conducting fundraising and other operations for…

Health
10
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
11
Fisk University

Fisk university produces graduates from diverse backgrounds with the integrity and intellect required for substantive contributions to society. our curriculum is grounded in the liberal arts. our faculty and administrators emphasize the…

Education
12
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bancroft a New Jersey Non Profit Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Imajnz Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INDIAN CREEK FOUNDATION: $48,150 · HealthINDIAN CREEK FOUNDATION+2 more: $1,540 · HealthDEEEP WELL PROJECT: $1,840 · OtherDEEEP WELL PROJECTJewish Agency for Israel: $1,000 · OtherJewish Agency for …CCP OF CULTURE TRUST: $1,000 · OtherCCP OF CULTURE TRU…THE LOURIE CENTER: $1,000 · OtherTHE LOURIE CENTERUSA FEDERATION OF NY: $900 · OtherUSA FEDERATION OF …NICHOLAS DISASTER RELIEF FUND: $750 · OtherNICHOLAS DISASTER …ST JOSEPHS HEALTHCARE FDN: $500 · OtherCIRCLES 4 SUCCESS: $468 · OtherFeeding America: $1,200 · OtherFeeding AmericaMEND I INC: $625 · Other1LOVE4ANIMALS INC: $500 · Other+14 more: $2,190 · Other+14 moreLUCY OUTREACH A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $3,630 · Youth DevelopmentFACE TO FACE INC: $1,600 · Human ServicesBANCROFT A NEW JERSEY NON PROFIT CORPORATION: $890 · Human ServicesSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $750 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $1,000 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $750 · InternationalSTUDENT DIPLOMACY CORPS INC: $150 · InternationalTHE JOSEPH FUND INC: $1,100 · PhilanthropyMILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $250 · PhilanthropyROWAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,343 · Education
Health$49,690Other$11,973Youth Development$3,630Human Services$3,240International$1,900Philanthropy$1,350Education$1,343

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINDIAN CREEK FOUNDATION: $48,150 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLUCY OUTREACH A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $3,630 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFACE TO FACE INC: $1,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROWAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,343 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOAKS INTEGRATED CARE INC: $1,125 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOSEPH FUND INC: $1,100 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBANCROFT A NEW JERSEY NON PROFIT CORPORATION: $890 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEND I INC: $625 over 2y, 0.1% of budget1LOVE4ANIMALS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $415 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTUDENT DIPLOMACY CORPS INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEXINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMAJNZ FOUNDATION: $40 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chubb Charitable Foun…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Chubb Charitable FoundationPA14.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chubb Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eisen Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eisen Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Oaks Integrated Care Inc: 31% of income from government
  • Turning Point Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Rowan University Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Eisen Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Eisen Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eisen’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home