Skip to content
Einhorn Collaborative at a glance

· Private foundation

Einhorn Collaborative

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$109k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$621kCommunity Improvement$111kPublic Benefit$70kEducation$56kInternational$38kHealth$18kCivil Rights$17kRecreation & Sports$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $46k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COUNCIL ON FOUNDATIONS INC$50,000
THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC$20,700
JEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK$15,000
PHILANTHROPY FOR ACTIVE CIVIC ENGAGEMENT$10,000
GRANTMAKERS IN HEALTH$6,150
COUNCIL ON FOUNDATIONS INC$4,000
POLICY IMPACT$2,500
FANTASY CARES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE NANTUCKET PROJECT ACADEMY INC: $15k → 6%HAYMAKERS FOR HOPE INC: $180 → 7%THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $25k → 16%FANTASY CARES: $1k → 6%POLICY IMPACT: $3k → 10%POLICY IMPACT: $3k → 12%INSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT NEWS: $1k → 14%DONORSCHOOSE ORG: $500 → 17%COUNCIL ON FOUNDATIONS INC: $50k → 14%2020 AMERICANS LLC: $20k → 12%MEDIATORS FOUNDATION INC: $13k → 12%THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $180 → 17%ESPERANZA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $180 → 9%THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $21k → 16%POLICY IMPACT: $3k → 10%POLICY IMPACT: $3k → 12%DONORSCHOOSE ORG: $180 → 17%COUNCIL ON FOUNDATIONS INC: $8k → 14%2020 AMERICANS LLC: $17k → 12%MEDIATORS FOUNDATION INC: $13k → 12%THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $15k → 16%THE PRAXIS PROJECT INC: $250 → 10%JEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK: $15k → 17%COUNCIL ON FOUNDATIONS INC: $8k → 14%MEDIATORS FOUNDATION INC: $13k → 12%THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $13k → 16%JEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK: $10k → 17%COUNCIL ON FOUNDATIONS INC: $8k → 14%THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $13k → 16%TEMPLE SHAARAY TEFILA: $180 → 17%COUNCIL ON FOUNDATIONS INC: $4k → 14%THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $13k → 16%CRUTCHES 4 KIDS INC: $18k → 17%PHILANTHROPY FOR ACTIVE CIVIC ENGAGEMENT: $10k → 14%PHILANTHROPY FOR ACTIVE CIVIC ENGAGEMENT: $10k → 14%PHILANTHROPY FOR ACTIVE CIVIC ENGAGEMENT: $10k → 14%PHILANTHROPY FOR ACTIVE CIVIC ENGAGEMENT: $10k → 14%PHILANTHROPY FOR ACTIVE CIVIC ENGAGEMENT: $10k → 14%NEW VENTURE FUND: $250k → 14%NATIONAL PUBLIC EDUCATION SUPPORT FUND: $20k → 14%INDEPENDENT SECTOR: $13k → 14%NATIONAL PUBLIC EDUCATION SUPPORT FUND: $10k → 14%GRANTMAKERS IN HEALTH: $6k → 14%AMALGAMATED CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $250k → 14%GRANTMAKERS IN HEALTH: $6k → 14%PEAK GRANTMAKING INC: $2k → 14%GRANTMAKERS IN HEALTH: $6k → 14%BIKE TO THE BEACH INC: $39 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
MA
OH
CT
CA
CO
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$383k · 9 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
12

Total granted

$383k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+1%

Still filing today

89%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyEducationHealthCommunity ImprovementInternationalPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $98k · revenue +31%
  • Council on Foundations Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $77k · revenue +8%
  • PF
    Philanthropy for Active Civic Engagement
    5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • C4
    CRUTCHES 4 KIDS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $18k · revenue -100%
  • TN
    THE NANTUCKET PROJECT ACADEMY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +146%
  • INDEPENDENT SECTOR
    one grant, 2021 · $13k · revenue +17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
2
Impactassetsinc

The mission of this corporation is to be the preeminent partner for impact investing and charitable giving, helping us all achieve our greatest impact.

Philanthropy
3
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
4
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
5
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
6
Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

Our vision is to reimagine everyday giving to help charities. our mission is to enable the world's leading online platforms to create opportunities for everyday charitable giving. in doing so, we ensure our programs are trustworthy,…

Philanthropy
7
Impact Charitable

Impact charitable unites catalytic philanthropists with community partners, financial institutions, foundations, social enterprises, and governmental bodies. as an impact capital catalyst, impact charitable unlocks and accelerates capital…

Philanthropy
8
Patient Access Network Foundation

As a leading charitable foundation and healthcare advocacy organization, the pan foundation is dedicated to accelerating access to treatment for those who need it most and empowering patients on their healthcare journeys. we provide…

—
9
Center for American Progress

The center for american progress (cap) is an independent nonpartisan policy institute that is dedicated to improving the lives of all americans through bold, progressive ideas, as well as strong leadership and concerted action. our aim is…

Civil Rights
10
Confluence Philanthropy Inc

Confluence philanthropy's mission is to transform the practice of investing by aligning capital with our community's values of sustainability, equity, and justice.

Philanthropy
11
International Budget Partnership

Ibp works with civil society, governments, international institutions and the private sector to bring about a world in which empowered citizens participate in open, inclusive public budgeting processes to shape policies and practices that…

International
12
The Alliance for Media Arts Culture Inc

To facilitate collaboration, innovation, strategic growth and cultural impact for the media arts field. We are a network of networks; we embolden creative media organization and artists and connect them with the world.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Peak Grantmaking Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Add Impact Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
11/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc: $250,000 · PhilanthropyAmalgamated Charitable Foundation IncCouncil on Foundations Inc: $76,500 · PhilanthropyCouncil on Foundations IncPhilanthropy for Active Civic Engagement: $50,000 · PhilanthropyPhilanthropy for Active Civic EngagementJEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK: $25,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FUNDERS NETWORKGRANTMAKERS IN HEALTH: $18,300 · Philanthropy+2 more: $14,125 · PhilanthropyNEW VENTURE FUND: $250,000 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE FUNDTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $98,200 · Community ImprovementTHIRD SECTO…2020 AMERICANS LLC: $37,000 · OtherCRUTCHES 4 KIDS INC: $18,000 · Other+7 more: $2,009 · OtherMEDIATORS FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 · InternationalNATIONAL PUBLIC EDUCATION SUPPORT FUND: $30,000 · Public BenefitTHE NANTUCKET PROJECT ACADEMY INC: $15,000 · EducationCONTINA IMPACT: $10,000 · EducationINSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT NEWS: $1,000 · Education+1 more: $680 · Education
Philanthropy$433,925Environment$250,000Community Improvement$98,200Other$57,009International$37,500Public Benefit$30,000Education$26,680

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc: $250,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $98,200 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCouncil on Foundations Inc: $76,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPhilanthropy for Active Civic Engagement: $50,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetMEDIATORS FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC EDUCATION SUPPORT FUND: $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetJEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGRANTMAKERS IN HEALTH: $18,300 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCRUTCHES 4 KIDS INC: $18,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTHE NANTUCKET PROJECT ACADEMY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetINDEPENDENT SECTOR: $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCONTINA IMPACT: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPEAK GRANTMAKING INC: $1,625 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFantasy Cares: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT NEWS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $680 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PRAXIS PROJECT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAYMAKERS FOR HOPE INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetESPERANZA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADD IMPACT NETWORK INC: $39 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The William & Flora H…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The William & Flora Hewlett FoundationCA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Einhorn Collaborative funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Einhorn Collaborative. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Third Sector New England Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Einhorn Collaborative’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home