· Public charity
Eighteen Sixty-Seven Foundation Inc
The foundation was established to provide philanthropic support to the st.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $12,800 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $71,185 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $58,385 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOOKS FOR STL KIDS | $6,800 |
| PI BETA PHI | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KHKINGDOM HOUSE D/B/A LIFEWISE STL2× · 2021–2023 · $18k · revenue -5%
- PBPI BETA PHI FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2025 · $17k · revenue +11%
- BFBOOKS FOR STL KIDS3× · 2023–2025 · $14k · revenue +3%
Funded once
- SWSNEAKERS WITH SOULgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +59%
- SLST LOUIS OVARIAN CANCER AWARENESSgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +66%
- BMBIG MUDDY DANCE COone grant, 2021 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide children with hope, understanding, and compassion so they can reach their full potential.
To promote the possibilities of charitable giving, helping charitable citizens understand how they can effectively provide for the community they love and the causes they care deeply about.
To enable individuals with developmental disabilities to achieve the highest level of independent living and live a full and enriched life.
Children First brings the community together to create better outcomes so that every young person in St. Louis Park can thrive. We convene cross-sector initiatives working to change the odds for our children and families.
Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.
The foundation engages in activities that support and benefit the st. louis public library through soliciting, receiving, and holding gifts for the benefit of the library.
To promote (and to benefit and support organizations who also promote) education, scientific research, economic development, and transfer of beneficial technologies to the public, all in the biosciences and life sciences fields.
Support childhood literacy
Girls on the run of st. louis (gotr-stl) inspires girls to be joyful, healthy and confident using a fun experienced base curriculum which integrates running. gotr-stl is a health and wellness program for girls in grades 3-8.
St. louis area foodbank is building a stronger bi-state region by nourishing people, empowering communities, and transforming systems.
The mission of the st. louis county library is to provide the resources and services to enrich minds, enhance lives and expand perspectives. the library foundation is committed to keeping our public library system strong and vibrant,…
Fostering community and joy across the st. louis region through the shakespearean tradition of art for all.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis Dance Theatre and the most unlike its peers is Sneakers With Soul. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Edward Jones Foundation · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Eighteen Sixty-Seven Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.