Skip to content
Egtvedt Charitable Trust Special 1 at a glance

· Private foundation

Egtvedt Charitable Trust Special 1

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.5M
Granted FY2022
24
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$908k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2022.

Education$4.3MHealth$4.1MReligion$1.1MPhilanthropy$994kHuman Services$728kHousing & Shelter$434kYouth Development$162kOther$0
02FY2022 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $172k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $2.0M
  • $250k+5 grants · $2.3M
$123,930
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEATTLE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$908,113
THE KENNEY$467,510
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$371,790
PACIFIC LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY$313,032
WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY$278,843
UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY$238,786
PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE$232,369
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH$231,717
FULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$216,878
FOSS HOME AND VILLAGE$154,913
SEATTLE PACIFIC FOUNDATION$139,264
IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH DEDICATED$123,930
BALLARD FIRST LUTHERAN CHURCH$123,930
SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY$108,439
CRISTA MINISTRIES$92,948
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $629k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOYS REPUBLIC: $57k → 14%BOYS REPUBLIC: $54k → 14%THE KENNEY: $468k → 9%BOYS REPUBLIC: $52k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 21 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
1

Total granted

$11M
$110k

Still filing today

52%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
EducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WU
    WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $781k · revenue +15%
  • FH
    FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER
    3× · 2020–2022 · $661k · revenue +11%
  • FT
    FULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $607k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • IL
    IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $110k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Seattle University

Seattle University is dedicated to educating the whole person, to professional formation, and to empowering leaders for a just and humane world.

—
4
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

—
5
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
6
Northwestern Health Sciences University

Northwestern health sciences university prepares and serves the next generation of professionals and leaders to become vital contributors to the delivery and advancement of health care. our mission is accomplished through educational…

Education
7
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
8
Southwestern Christian University

Scu is a christ-centered liberal arts institution equipping students for a life of learning, leadership, and service; integrating faith, learning, and living; and empowering graduates to excel and to positively impact their world for jesus…

Education
9
Pacific School of Religion

Pacific school of religion prepares a diverse cadre of spiritually rooted leaders with the vision, resilience, and skill to create a world where all can thrive. grounded in the rigorous study and faithful practice of progressive christian…

Education
10
Los Angeles Pacific University

Los angeles pacific university exists to deliver high quality, accessible christ-centered education to learners everywhere.

Education
11
Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences

Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences educates and trains health care professionals emphasizing service among rural and medically under-served communities throughout the Northwest.

Education
12
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Pacific University; the most unlike its peers is Biola University Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/17
Grantees still filing
9/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $1,650,224 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITALUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $1,041,309 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONSEATTLE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $908,113 · OtherSEATTLE CHILDRENS HOSPITALIndividual grant recipient: $854,833 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $660,958 · OtherFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTERBALLARD FIRST LUTHERAN CHURCH: $347,103 · OtherBALLARD FIRST LUTHERAN CHURCHTHE SALVATION ARMY: $260,328 · OtherIMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH DEDICATED: $236,959 · OtherVIRGINIA MASON FOUNDATION: $220,321 · Other+2 more: $208,049 · OtherPacific Lutheran University: $881,705 · EducationPacific Lutheran UniversityWHITWORTH UNIVERSITY: $780,982 · EducationWHITWORTH UNIVERSITYFULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $607,430 · EducationFULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARYSEATTLE PACIFIC FOUNDATION: $591,468 · EducationSEATTLE PACIFIC FOUNDATIONBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC: $260,328 · EducationBIOLA UNIVERSITY INCSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $108,439 · EducationPACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $650,818 · HealthNAVOS: $137,201 · HealthEisenhower Medical Center: $107,910 · Health+1 more: $29,161 · HealthUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY: $678,722 · PhilanthropySEATTLE FOUNDATION: $94,730 · PhilanthropyTHE KENNEY: $467,510 · Human ServicesBoys Republic: $161,867 · Human ServicesFOSS HOME & VILLAGE: $433,879 · Housing & ShelterCRISTA Ministries: $260,328 · Religion
Other$6,388,197Education$3,230,352Health$925,090Philanthropy$773,452Human Services$629,377Housing & Shelter$433,879Religion$260,328

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPacific Lutheran University: $881,705 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWHITWORTH UNIVERSITY: $780,982 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY: $678,722 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $660,958 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $650,818 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetFULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $607,430 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSEATTLE PACIFIC FOUNDATION: $591,468 over 3y, 35% of budgetTHE KENNEY: $467,510 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetFOSS HOME & VILLAGE: $433,879 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC: $260,328 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCRISTA Ministries: $260,328 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBoys Republic: $161,867 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNAVOS: $137,201 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $108,439 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center: $107,910 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $94,730 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMULTICARE FOUNDATIONS: $29,161 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Pacific Lutheran University ↗
  • Who funds WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds FULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE PACIFIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE KENNEY ↗
  • Who funds FOSS HOME & VILLAGE ↗
  • Who funds BIOLA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds CRISTA Ministries ↗
  • Who funds Boys Republic ↗
  • Who funds NAVOS ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MULTICARE FOUNDATIONS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Egtvedt Charitable Tr…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Egtvedt Charitable Trust Special 1NV15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Egtvedt Charitable Trust Special 1 · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Egtvedt Charitable Trust Special 1 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Egtvedt Charitable Trust Special 1. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Egtvedt Charitable Trust Special 1’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home