· Private foundation
Egtvedt Charitable Trust Special 1
Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- $10k–50k5 grants · $172k
- $50k–250k14 grants · $2.0M
- $250k+5 grants · $2.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SEATTLE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL | $908,113 |
| THE KENNEY | $467,510 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON | $371,790 |
| PACIFIC LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY | $313,032 |
| WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY | $278,843 |
| UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY | $238,786 |
| PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE | $232,369 |
| FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH | $231,717 |
| FULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY | $216,878 |
| FOSS HOME AND VILLAGE | $154,913 |
| SEATTLE PACIFIC FOUNDATION | $139,264 |
| IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH DEDICATED | $123,930 |
| BALLARD FIRST LUTHERAN CHURCH | $123,930 |
| SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY | $108,439 |
| BIOLA UNIVERSITY | $92,948 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $629k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
21 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WUWHITWORTH UNIVERSITY3× · 2020–2022 · $781k · revenue +15%
- FHFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER3× · 2020–2022 · $661k · revenue +11%
- FTFULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY3× · 2020–2022 · $607k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- ILIMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCHone grant, 2020 · $110k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Seattle University is dedicated to educating the whole person, to professional formation, and to empowering leaders for a just and humane world.
To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.
Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.
Northwestern health sciences university prepares and serves the next generation of professionals and leaders to become vital contributors to the delivery and advancement of health care. our mission is accomplished through educational…
A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.
Scu is a christ-centered liberal arts institution equipping students for a life of learning, leadership, and service; integrating faith, learning, and living; and empowering graduates to excel and to positively impact their world for jesus…
Pacific school of religion prepares a diverse cadre of spiritually rooted leaders with the vision, resilience, and skill to create a world where all can thrive. grounded in the rigorous study and faithful practice of progressive christian…
Los angeles pacific university exists to deliver high quality, accessible christ-centered education to learners everywhere.
Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences educates and trains health care professionals emphasizing service among rural and medically under-served communities throughout the Northwest.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Pacific University and the most unlike its peers is Biola University Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Pacific Lutheran University ↗
- Who funds WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY ↗
- Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds FULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE PACIFIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE KENNEY ↗
- Who funds FOSS HOME & VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds BIOLA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds CRISTA Ministries ↗
- Who funds Boys Republic ↗
- Who funds NAVOS ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MULTICARE FOUNDATIONS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Egtvedt Charitable Trust Special 1 · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Egtvedt Charitable Trust Special 1 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.