Loading…
· Private foundation
EGTVEDT CHARITABLE TRUST SPECIAL 1
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$2.8M
Granted FY2023
15
Grants
3
Communities
$558k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 15 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- $10k–50k1 grant · $42k
- $50k–250k11 grants · $1.6M
- $250k+3 grants · $1.1M
$195,409
Median grant
3
States reached
$72M
Total assets
Largest grants
- SEATTLE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$558,311
- UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$334,987
- WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY$251,240
- PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE$209,367
- FULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OPERATING$195,409
- PACIFIC LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY$195,409
- SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY$195,409
- THE KENNEY$195,409
- FOSS HOME AND VILLAGE$139,578
- BALLARD FIRST LUTHERAN CHURCH$111,662
- IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH DEDICATED$111,662
- CRISTA MINISTRIES$83,747
- BIOLA UNIVERSITY$83,747
- THE SALVATION ARMY$83,747
- UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY$41,873
02The need
02
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $195k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Pacific University
A diverse sustainable community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship, and practice, pacific inspires students to think, care, and pursue justice in our world
Education
2
Washington University
The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)
Education
3
The University of Puget Sound
Develop students to sustain intellectual curiosity, active inquiry, & reasoned independence
Education
4
Pacific Union College
Seventh-day adventist college providing christ-centered education.
Education
5
Azusa Pacific University
To advance the work of God in the world through academic excellence in higher education.
Education
6
University of Portland
The University of Portland, an independently governed Catholic university guided by the Congregation of Holy Cross, addresses significant questions of human concern through interdisciplinary studies of the arts, sciences, and humanities…
Education
7
Bellevue University
Non-profit incorporated in nebraska that provides higher education services to adult students.
Education
8
Hawaii Pacific University
Hpu is an international learning community set in the rich cultural context of hawaii. our innovative programs prepare our graduates as active members of a global society.
Education
9
Southwest Baptist University
Sbu provides undergraduate and graduate degrees & offers a variety of activities, amenities, & scholarships to prepare students to become servant leaders in a global society.
Education
10
Oregon Health & Science University
Ohsuf is a nonprofit organization established in 1970 dedicated to secure private philanthropic support for ohsu and to invest and manage gifts responsibly in accordance with donors' wishes.
Education
11
Westmont College
Westmont College is an undergraduate, residential, Christian, liberal arts community serving God's kingdom by cultivating thoughtful scholars, grateful servants and faithful leaders for global engagement with the academy, church and world.
Education
12
Washington College
Washington college challenges and inspires emerging citizen leaders to discover lives of purpose and passion.
Education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pacific Northwest Research Institute and the most unlike its peers is Crista Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$1,395,778Education$725,805Health$209,367Human Services$195,409Housing & Shelter$139,578Religion$83,747Philanthropy$41,873
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE KENNEY ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds FOSS HOME AND VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds BIOLA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CRISTA MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Egtvedt Charitable Trust Special 1NV16× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Egtvedt Charitable Trust Special 1 · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation EGTVEDT CHARITABLE TRUST SPECIAL 1 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~2 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 910667886 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 2 months of cash on hand.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 4% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Egtvedt Charitable Trust Special 1?
Find your warmest path to Egtvedt Charitable Trust Special 1 through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines