Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Efaw Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$97kHuman Services$26kPhilanthropy$11kAnimals$3kRecreation & Sports$1kArts & Culture$1kHealth$500
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEARTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$25,000
ILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$5,200
MCLEAN COUNTY ARTS CENTER$1,000
EASTER SEALS$500
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LIFELONG ACCESS: $20k → 11%MARCFIRST: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$71k · 7 repeat orgs$69k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +126% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
10

Total granted

$71k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+126%
+32%

Still filing today

57%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2023 · $32k
  • LA
    LIFELONG ACCESS
    2× · 2019–2023 · $23k · revenue +131%
  • SC
    SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT STATE UNIV
    2× · 2018–2020 · $10k

Funded once

  • BP
    BLOOMINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • SC
    SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +26%
  • BH
    BLOOMINGTON HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTER CLUB
    one grant, 2024 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
2
Illinois Institute of Technology

To provide distinctive and relevant education in an environment of scientific, technological, and professional knowledge creation and innovation.

Education
3
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
4
Illinois State University Foundation

To elevate illinois state university through the power of philanthropy.

Education
5
Bradley University

Bradley university empowers students for immediate and sustained success in their personal and professional endeavors by combining professional preparation, liberal arts and sciences, and co-curricular experiences. alongside our dedication…

Education
6
Clark College District 14 Foundation

Clark college foundation inspires the joy of philanthropy in support of student success and program excellence at clark college.

Education
7
Trustees of Clark University

Clark university's mission is to educate undergraduate and graduate students to be imaginative and contributing citizens of the world, and to advance the frontiers of knowledge and understanding through rigorous scholarship and creative…

Education
8
East-West University

East-west university is an independent institution of higher learning located in downtown chicago. its mission is the pursuit of excellence by all through relevant, effective and convenient education and service to humankind with a global,…

Education
9
The Carle Foundation Hospital

To be the trusted partner in all healthcare decisions and to improve health by providing highly accessible, world-class care and services.

Health
10
Rockford University

To educate men & women to lead responsible lives by means of a curriculum grounded in liberal arts learning and complemented and extended by professional and practical experience, through the total academic and co-curricular experience,…

Education
11
Mcdaniel College Inc

Mcdaniel college is a diverse student-centered community committed to excellence in the liberal arts & sciences and professional studies with careful mentoring and attention to the individual. mcdaniel changes lives. we challenge students…

Education
12
Illinois Science and Technology Institute

The institute will advance science and technology through the education of illinois residents, the provision of grants to institutions and organizations for scientific research in the areas of science and technology, and by providing…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Illinois Wesleyan University and the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION — $31,784 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATIONBLOOMINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION — $25,000 · OtherBLOOMINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATIONHEARTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $25,000 · OtherHEARTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONSOUTHERN CONNECTICUT STATE UNIV — $10,000 · OtherSOUTHERN CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVEASTER SEALS INC — $3,900 · Other+8 more — $2,570 · OtherLIFELONG ACCESS — $22,520 · Human ServicesLIFELONG ACCESSSOUTHERN CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · EducationSOUTHERN CON…ILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $5,200 · EducationILLINOIS WES…+1 more — $100 · EducationMILLER PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $2,375 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC — $200 · AnimalsMCLEAN COUNTY ARTS CENTER — $1,000 · Arts & CultureBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $250 · Health
Other$98,254Human Services$22,520Education$15,300Animals$2,575Arts & Culture$1,000Health$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHEARTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLIFELONG ACCESS — $22,520 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHERN CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $5,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS INC — $3,900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMILLER PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $2,375 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMCLEAN COUNTY ARTS CENTER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEYOND THE BOOKS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEARTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LIFELONG ACCESS
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS INC
  • Who funds MILLER PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds MCLEAN COUNTY ARTS CENTER
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds BEYOND THE BOOKS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Snyder Family Foundation NfpIL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Snyder Family Foundation Nfp · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Efaw Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph