Skip to content
Ee Geduld Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Ee Geduld Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$1.1MEducation$580kHealth$282kArts & Culture$218kReligion$97kFood & Nutrition$35kYouth Development$3kPhilanthropy$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 97% of reported assets are held in Bank Of America Corp Com.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NYC OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOLS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JCC MANHATTAN: $3k → 17%ENCOURAGE KIDS FOUNDATION: $20k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
NY
MA
NJ
CT
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 21 repeat orgs$440k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
22

Total granted

$1.8M
$440k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+22%

Still filing today

71%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Northwestern University
    5× · 2017–2021 · $1.1M · revenue +41%
  • TB
    THE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND
    4× · 2019–2022 · $250k · revenue +5%
  • AF
    ANDERSON FOUNDATION FOR AUTISM
    6× · 2017–2024 · $75k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • AE
    ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE
    one grant, 2022 · $122k
  • NY
    New York Historical Society
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue -8%
  • TG
    THE GILDER LEHRMAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN HISTORY
    one grant, 2017 · $53k · revenue -14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
3
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
4
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
7
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
8
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
9
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
10
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
11
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York; the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
24/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Northwestern University: $1,050,000 · Recreation & SportsNorthwestern UniversityCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $74,750 · Recreation & SportsCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INCTHE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND: $250,001 · EducationTHE BARUCH COLLEGE FUNDTrustees of Dartmouth College: $150,000 · EducationTrustees of Dartmouth Co…THE GILDER LEHRMAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN HISTORY: $52,500 · EducationTHE GILDER LEHRMAN INSTI…Trustees of Tufts College: $25,000 · Education+5 more: $26,250 · EducationALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $121,588 · OtherALBERT EINSTEIN COLL…DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $100,000 · OtherDARTMOUTH COLLEGEWESTHAMPTON SYNAGOGUE INC: $54,000 · OtherWESTHAMPTON SYNAGOGU…CONGREGATION RODEPH SHOLOM: $26,553 · OtherCONGREGATION RODEPH …FILMAKERS COLLABORATIVE-IN A DIFFERENT: $25,000 · OtherFILMAKERS COLLABORAT…Individual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant rec…RADICAL HOPE INC: $25,000 · OtherRADICAL HOPE INCNEW YORK CITY OUTWARD BOUND CENTER INC DBA NYC OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOLS: $20,000 · Other+12 more: $41,850 · Other+12 moreNew York Historical Society: $100,000 · Arts & CultureTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $30,000 · Arts & CultureLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $5,500 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $5,100 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $2,500 · Arts & CultureANDERSON FOUNDATION FOR AUTISM: $75,000 · HealthFOOD ALLERGY FUND: $20,000 · Health+4 more: $8,000 · HealthFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC: $35,000 · Food & NutritionENCOURAGE KIDS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC: $2,500 · Human Services
Recreation & Sports$1,124,750Education$503,751Other$438,991Arts & Culture$143,100Health$103,000Food & Nutrition$35,000Human Services$22,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNorthwestern University: $1,050,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND: $250,001 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNew York Historical Society: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetANDERSON FOUNDATION FOR AUTISM: $75,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $74,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GILDER LEHRMAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN HISTORY: $52,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENCOURAGE KIDS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNEW YORK CITY OUTWARD BOUND CENTER INC DBA NYC OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOLS: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD ALLERGY FUND: $20,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT FUND INC: $12,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetI HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $5,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDALTON SCHOOLS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF RODEPH SHOLOM SCHOOL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJACK MARTIN FUND INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALL STARS PROJECT INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAKING HEADWAY FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MICHAEL BOLTON CHARITIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAGAHOZO-SHALOM YOUTH VILLAGE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WESTHAMPTON AMBULANCE INC: $125 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundFjcThe Goldman Sachs Cha…National Philanthropi…The New York Communit…Vanguard Charitable E…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…The Pfizer Foundation…American Endowment Fo…American Online Givin…
Jewish Communal FundNY22.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Fjc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The New York Community Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ee Geduld Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ee Geduld Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ee Geduld Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Ee Geduld Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ee Geduld Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home