Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edwin J and Ruth M Shoemaker Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$895k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$1.0MCivil Rights$985kHealth$700kReligion$541kHuman Services$250kInternational$185kEnvironment$105kYouth Development$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $460k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $415k
$25,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$100,000
RIGHT TO LIFE EDUCATION FUND$85,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN TRANSPLANT CENTER$80,000
COVENANT COLLEGE FOUNDATION$50,000
ST JOHN LUTHERAN SCHOOL$50,000
REDEEMER LUTHERAN CHURCH$50,000
LUTHERAN SPECIAL EDUCATION MINISTRIES$40,000
HEARTBEAT OF MONROE$40,000
THOMAS MORE LAW CENTER$40,000
GABBY'S GRIEF CENTER$35,000
CARE NET OF PUGET SOUND$30,000
Lutheran Hour Ministries$30,000
St John Amelith Lutheran School$30,000
MISSION TO NORTH AMERICA$25,000
St John the Divine Anglican Church$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 56% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ST JOHN LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $53k → 8%THRIVE MEDICAL CLINIC FKA PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $30k → 10%REDEEMER LUTHERAN CHURCH: $80k → 10%RIGHT TO LIFE EDUCATION FUND: $150k → 11%Camp Arcadia: $100k → 13%LUTHERAN SPECIAL EDUCATION MINISTRIES: $40k → 14%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $50k → 14%St John Amelith Lutheran School: $30k → 14%Lutheran Hour Ministries: $30k → 11%COVENANT COLLEGE: $50k → 15%CARE NET OF PUGET SOUND: $35k → 9%ST JOHN LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $50k → 8%REDEEMER LUTHERAN CHURCH: $50k → 10%RIGHT TO LIFE EDUCATION FUND: $125k → 11%CAMP ARCADIA: $45k → 13%LUTHERAN SPECIAL EDUCATION MINISTRIES: $40k → 14%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $50k → 14%COVENANT COLLEGE: $50k → 15%CARE NET OF PUGET SOUND: $30k → 9%ST JOHN LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $50k → 8%REDEEMER LUTHERAN CHURCH: $40k → 10%RIGHT TO LIFE EDUCATION FUND: $125k → 11%CAMP ARCADIA: $45k → 13%LUTHERAN SPECIAL EDUCATION MINISTRIES: $40k → 14%COVENANT COLLEGE: $50k → 15%CARE NET OF PUGET SOUND: $30k → 9%REDEEMER LUTHERAN CHURCH: $40k → 10%RIGHT TO LIFE EDUCATION FUND: $100k → 11%LUTHERAN SPECIAL EDUCATION MINISTRIES: $40k → 14%COVENANT COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $50k → 15%CARE NET OF PUGET SOUND: $30k → 9%REDEEMER LUTHERAN CHURCH: $40k → 10%RIGHT TO LIFE EDUCATION FUND: $100k → 11%LUTHERAN SPECIAL EDUCATION MINISTRIES: $40k → 14%COVENANT COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $50k → 15%RIGHT TO LIFE EDUCATION FUND: $85k → 11%LUTHERAN SPECIAL EDUCATION MINISTRIES: $40k → 14%COVENANT COLLEGE: $50k → 15%TRINITY LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $100k → 10%TRINITY LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $100k → 10%TRINITY LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $100k → 10%HEARTBEAT OF MONROE: $45k → 10%HEARTBEAT OF MONROE: $40k → 10%HEARTBEAT OF MONROE: $40k → 10%HEARTBEAT OF MONROE: $40k → 10%HEARTBEAT OF MONROE: $40k → 10%HEARTBEAT OF MONROE: $35k → 10%GABBY'S GRIEF CENTER: $35k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
IN
CA
MO
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.7M · 31 repeat orgs$215k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
9

Total granted

$4.7M
$165k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+115%

Still filing today

23%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HEARTBEAT OF MONROE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $240k · revenue +130% · 46% of their budget
  • CC
    COVENANT COLLEGE
    4× · 2020–2023 · $200k · revenue +27%
  • CN
    Care Net Pregnancy & Family Services of Puget Sound
    6× · 2020–2025 · $185k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • DO
    DIOCESE OF OLYMPIA (FUNDS TO ST JOHN'S SQUAMISH BC)
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Crown College

The mission of crown college is to provide a biblically based education for christian leadership in the christian and missionary alliance, the church-at-large, and the world.

—
2
Tabor College

Preparing people for a life of learning, work, and service for Christ and His kingdom.

Education
3
Central Christian College of Kansas

Central christian college of kansas is a four-year, non-profit liberal arts college with the primary mission of offering a christ-centered education for character.

Education
4
Calvin University

The mission of calvin university is to equip students to think deeply, to act justly, and to live wholeheartedly as christ's agents of renewal in the world.

Education
5
Geneva College

Geneva college is a christ-centered academic community that provides a comprehensive education to equip students for faithful and fruitful service to god and neighbor.

Education
6
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
7
Reformation Bible College Inc

Reformation Bible College exists to provide a place for learning devoted to serving both laymen and pastors, offering both undergraduate and graduate degree programs based on Reformed Christian doctrine.

Education
8
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
9
Criswell College

The mission of criswell college is to provide ministerial and professional higher education for men and women preparing to serve as christian leaders throughout society, while maintaining an institutional commitment to biblical inerrancy.

Education
10
Belhaven University

Belhaven university prepares students academically and spiritually to serve jesus christ in their careers, in human relationships, and in the world of ideas.

Education
11
Gordon College

Gordon college strives to graduate men & women distinguished by (continued on schedule o) (continuation) intellectual maturity and christian character, committed to lives of service and prepared for leadership worldwide.

Education
12
Barclay College

The mission of barclay college is to prepare students in a bible-centered environment for effective christian life, service, and leadership.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Covenant College Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RIGHT TO LIFE EDUCATION FUND: $685,000 · OtherRIGHT TO LIFE EDUCATION FUNDUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN TRANSPLANT CENTER: $445,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN TRANSPLANT CENTERTRINITY LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $300,000 · OtherTRINITY LUTHERAN SCHOOLREDEEMER LUTHERAN CHURCH: $250,000 · OtherREDEEMER LUTHERAN CHURCHHEARTBEAT OF MONROE INC: $240,000 · OtherHEARTBEAT OF MONROE INCLUTHERAN SPECIAL EDUCATION MINISTRIES: $240,000 · OtherLUTHERAN SPECIAL EDUCATION MINISTRIESIndividual grant recipient: $190,000 · OtherST JOHN LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $153,400 · Other+29 more: $1,437,600 · Other+29 moreTHOMAS MORE LAW CENTER: $425,000 · Human ServicesTHOMAS MO…COVENANT COLLEGE: $200,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $110,000 · EducationCare Net Pregnancy & Family Services of Puget Sound: $185,000 · HealthGABBY'S LADDER INC: $85,000 · HealthCAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER: $20,000 · PhilanthropyCross International Inc: $15,000 · Religion
Other$3,941,000Human Services$425,000Education$310,000Health$270,000Philanthropy$20,000Religion$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHOMAS MORE LAW CENTER: $425,000 over 6y, 7.1% of budgetHEARTBEAT OF MONROE INC: $240,000 over 6y, 46% of budgetCOVENANT COLLEGE: $200,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCare Net Pregnancy & Family Services of Puget Sound: $185,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $110,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetGABBY'S LADDER INC: $85,000 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetMUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCross International Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THOMAS MORE LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HEARTBEAT OF MONROE INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Care Net Pregnancy & Family Services of Puget Sound ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GABBY'S LADDER INC ↗
  • Who funds MUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS ↗
  • Who funds Island Christian Academy ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Cross International Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thrivent Financial for LutheransMN13.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edwin J and Ruth M Shoemaker Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edwin J and Ruth M Shoemaker Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Edwin J and Ruth M Shoemaker Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Edwin J and Ruth M Shoemaker Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edwin J and Ruth M Shoemaker’s filings →

    More from the funding graph