Skip to content
Edwin E Perkins Foundation Xxxxx0003 at a glance

· Private foundation

Edwin E Perkins Foundation Xxxxx0003

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$201k
Granted FY2026still arriving
11
Grants FY2026still arriving
3
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2026.

Human Services$639kFood & Nutrition$210kYouth Development$175kEducation$126kInternational$100kArts & Culture$69kReligion$50kEnvironment$45kOther$0
02FY2026 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k4 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $90k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA OF BOISE CITY IDAHO$90,000
MAJI DEVELOPMENT COALITION$25,000
ONE STONE INC$20,000
BOISE SUNRISE FOUNDATION INC$20,000
IDAHO MOUNTAIN SEARCH AND RESCUE UNIT$10,000
THE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO$10,000
CITY OF GOOD$10,000
JANNUS INC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
PROJECT AMIGO$5,000
IDAHO SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–26, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%THE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO: $10k → 8%THE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO: $5k → 8%THE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO: $5k → 8%JANNUS INC: $5k → 8%THE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO: $5k → 8%JANNUS INC: $5k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $25k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 19 repeat orgs$190k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2026, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
8

Total granted

$1.3M
$155k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+43%

Still filing today

63%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationHuman ServicesReligionFood & NutritionArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CARING HEARTS AND HANDS OF HOPE INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $100k · revenue +36%
  • EC
    ECOLOGY CENTER
    5× · 2018–2023 · $45k · revenue +126%
  • IS
    IDAHO SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC
    7× · 2018–2026 · $44k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • TY
    THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOISE CITY IDAHOgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $65k · revenue +74%
  • PC
    PONDEROSA CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -53%
  • IY
    IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Idaho Forest Restoration Partnership
Environment
2
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
3
Idaho Operation Lifesaver
—
4
Insight Colearning Center

Independent school for research-based high school education

Education
5
Brave Hearts Idaho
Arts & Culture
6
Indigenous Idaho Alliance Inc
Civil Rights
7
Idaho Hispanic Foundation Inc
Human Services
8
Idaho Medical Association Foundation Inc
Health
9
Idaho Wildlife Federation

The Idaho Wildlife Federation (IWF) promotes the conservation of Idaho's wildlife heritage and legacy of sporting opportunities for the current and future generations.

Animals
10
Underdogs Boise
Arts & Culture
11
Idaho Base Camp Inc

A nonprofit organization rooted in the wood river valley, idaho basecamp helps develop resilience, confidence, and connection in youth through adventure, exploration, and intentional play in the outdoors.

Environment
12
Building Hope Idaho Inc
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jannus Inc; the most unlike its peers is St Alphonsus Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
12/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YMCA OF BOISE CITY IDAHO: $515,000 · OtherYMCA OF BOISE CITY IDAHOYoung Men's Christian Association: $140,000 · OtherYoung Men's Christian AssociationTHE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOISE CITY IDAHO: $65,000 · OtherTHE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOISE CITY IDAHOMAJI DEVELOPMENT COALITION: $30,000 · OtherCity of Good Inc: $30,000 · Other+11 more: $114,000 · Other+11 moreCARING HEARTS AND HANDS OF HOPE INC: $100,000 · EducationCARING HEARTS A…ONE STONE INC: $55,000 · EducationONE STONE INCHASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationHASTINGS COLLEG…HASTINGS COLLEGE: $15,500 · EducationHASTINGS COLLEG…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TR…SIERRA HARVEST: $170,000 · Food & NutritionSIERRA HARVES…IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $10,000 · Food & NutritionIDAHO FOODBAN…ST ALPHONSUS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · ReligionThe Momentum Group Create Common Good: $41,554 · ReligionIDAHO SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC: $44,000 · Arts & CulturePONDEROSA CENTER: $25,000 · Arts & CultureTHE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesIDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesJANNUS INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesECOLOGY CENTER: $45,000 · Environment
Other$894,000Education$205,500Food & Nutrition$180,000Religion$91,554Arts & Culture$69,000Human Services$60,000Environment$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSIERRA HARVEST: $170,000 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetCARING HEARTS AND HANDS OF HOPE INC: $100,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetTHE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOISE CITY IDAHO: $65,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetONE STONE INC: $55,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetECOLOGY CENTER: $45,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetIDAHO SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC: $44,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetThe Momentum Group Create Common Good: $41,554 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetCity of Good Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetPONDEROSA CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetTHE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetIDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetHASTINGS COLLEGE: $15,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJANNUS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASS INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetINTERFAITH SANCTUARY HOUSING SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Idaho Community Found…Claude R & Ethel B Wh…Lamb Weston Charitabl…Angels Among US IncIdaho Power Foundatio…Laura Moore Cunningha…St Luke's Health Syst…Langan Barber Foundat…The Julius C Jeker Fo…Simplot Company Found…M J Murdock Charitabl…First Interstate Banc…
Idaho Community Foundation IncID23.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Claude R & Ethel B Whittenberger Foundation · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Angels Among US Inc · Idaho Power Foundation Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · St Luke's Health System Ltd · Langan Barber Foundation · The Julius C Jeker Foundation Inc · Simplot Company Foundation Inc · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edwin E Perkins Foundation Xxxxx0003 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edwin E Perkins Foundation Xxxxx0003. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edwin E Perkins Foundation Xxxxx0003’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home