How much did Edwin & Jeanne Trexler Foundation Inc grant in FY2024?

Edwin & Jeanne Trexler Foundation Inc reported 15 grants totaling $55,871 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is Edwin & Jeanne Trexler Foundation Inc based?

Edwin & Jeanne Trexler Foundation Inc is based in MD.

Edwin & Jeanne Trexler Foundation Inc

Foundation Dossiers

· Private foundation

Edwin & Jeanne Trexler Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$56k

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$8k

Largest

01What you fund

0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$78kAnimals$61kArts & Culture$60kPhilanthropy$46kHousing & Shelter$40kScience & Tech$35kEducation$31kYouth Development$30kOther$0

02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,500

Median grant

States reached

$928k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
HARFORD FAMILY HOUSE	$7,500
SINAI HOSPITAL	$7,500
BALTIMORE HUMANE SOCIETY	$6,539
BALTIMORE SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS	$6,400
BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA	$5,000
ITINERIS	$4,700
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS	$2,500
MISSION FIT	$2,500
COMFORT CASES	$2,482
MEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL MARYLAND	$2,000
CALTHOLIC CHARTITIES-OUR DAILY BREAD	$2,000
Individual grant recipient	$2,000
ENOCH PRATT FREE LIBRARY	$2,000
HOUSE OF RUTH	$2,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES	$750

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$403k · 23 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$403k

$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%

+29%

Still filing today

61%

67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHealthAnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

HF
HARFORD FAMILY HOUSE INC
7× · 2018–2024 · $40k · revenue +178%
MA
MARYLAND ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
7× · 2017–2023 · $35k · revenue +35%
II
Itineris Inc
8× · 2017–2024 · $33k · revenue +376%

Funded once

AL
ADELANTE LATINA INC
one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -90%
HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFEgraduated
one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +42%
TJ
THE JEMICY SCHOOL INCgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +29%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—

University of Maryland Facultyphysicians Inc

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland, school of medicine, administrative support services are provided to the physician practices of the university of maryland, including but not limited to information technology,…

Health

University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Health

University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

—

University of Maryland Pediatric Associates Pa

Health

The Maryland School for the Blind

As a statewide resource center, the school provides outreach, educational and residential services for students to reach their fullest potential by preparing them to be as successful, independent, and well-rounded contributing members of…

Education

University of Maryland Family Medicine Associates Pa

—

University of Maryland Surgical Associates Pa

Health

University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Education

University of Maryland Neurology Associates Pa

—

University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Health

University of Maryland Eye Associates Pa

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Maryland Spca Inc and the most unlike its peers is Nicole Van Horn Trust Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

3%1/32

the rest of the field

13%

3,400/25,338

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

31/32

Grantees still filing

26/32

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$227,440Arts & Culture$56,500Education$50,700Health$44,101Youth Development$25,250Animals$15,539Food & Nutrition$9,706

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The United Way of Central Maryland IncMD23.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Herbert Bearman Foundation · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · The Arthur B Wilner Foundation Inc · The Joseph Meyerhoff Fund Inc · The Marion I & Henry J Knott Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Foundation · The Aaron & Lillie Straus Fdn Inc 9830002 · Blanket Fort Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Edwin & Jeanne Trexler Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

12get no government money at all

7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Edwin & Jeanne Trexler Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Edwin & Jeanne Trexler Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home

State money flows

the interactive map of money crossing state lines