· Private foundation
Edward L Hutton Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $234k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $595k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY MATTERS | $215,000 |
| INDIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION - HUTTON FAMILY STUDY ABROAD | $100,000 |
| WESTERN ASSOCIATION FOR THE NY CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST | $70,000 |
| TREPANY HOUSE | $60,000 |
| LAWRENCE COUNTY MUSEUM OF HISTORY | $50,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS (MOUNTAIN OUTREACH) | $50,000 |
| THE RIVERS SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| KENYON COLLEGE-JENNIE HUTTON SCHOLARSHIP FUND | $40,000 |
| THE KENYON FUND | $20,000 |
| ORLEANS CONSERVATION TRUST | $15,000 |
| CORNELL UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL | $15,000 |
| BLOOMFIELD JUNIORSENIOR HIGH SCHOOL | $14,000 |
| NATIONAL SCHOLASTIC CHESS FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN REPERTORY THEATER | $10,000 |
| CENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $445k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
43 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Indiana University Foundation6× · 2017–2022 · $600k · revenue +97%- THTREPANY HOUSE9× · 2017–2025 · $530k · revenue +10% · 90% of their budget
The Trustees of Princeton University6× · 2017–2024 · $315k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- TKTHE KENYON FUND - JENNIE HUTTON SCHOLARSHIP FUNDone grant, 2019 · $54k
- TRTHE RIVERS SCHOOL - ELH SCHOLARSHIP FUNDone grant, 2017 · $40k
- GFGAMALIEL FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +108%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.
Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…
Education and Research
Amherst college educates students of exceptional potential from all backgrounds so that they may seek value and advance knowledge, engage the world around them, and lead principled lives of consequence. amherst brings together the most…
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Rivers School Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Lyndhurst Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Education Matters Inc ↗
- Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
- Who funds TREPANY HOUSE ↗
- Who funds MADISONVILLE EDUCATION AND ASSISTANCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
- Who funds FAITH IN ACTION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds ORLEANS CONSERVATION TRUST ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE RIVERS SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds HEADING HOME INC ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RELATIONS SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS ↗
- Who funds National Scholastic Chess Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN REPERTORY THEATRE CO INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE MOZARTINA MUSICAL ARTS CONSERVATORY INC ↗
- Who funds VOICE Buffalo Inc ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds STUDENTS TO SCHOLARS ↗
- Who funds WELLESLEY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES INC ↗
- Who funds WILDCARE INC ↗
- Who funds JUILLIARD SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Lyndhurst Foundation Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Edward L Hutton Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Center for Coastal Studies Inc — 26% of income from government
- Heading Home Inc — 17% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
- Academy of Performing Arts Inc — 2% of income from government
- Orleans Conservation Trust — 2% of income from government
- The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
- American Repertory Theatre Co Inc — 0% of income from government
- Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Edward L Hutton Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Edward L Hutton Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.