Skip to content
Edward-Elmhurst Healthcare at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Edward-Elmhurst Healthcare

Edward-Elmhurst Healthcare follows the mission of Endeavor Health to "help everyone in our communities be their best."

$6.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
States reached
$515k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$5.0MHousing & Shelter$1.3MFood & Nutrition$1.2MHuman Services$1.1MEducation$900kYouth Development$630kEmployment$605kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kOther$0
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 28 grants below total $5,873,088, the rows itemized in this filing. The $6,707,519 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $834,431 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $1.9M
  • $250k+12 grants · $3.9M
$225,000
Median grant
—
States reached
$355M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Dupage Health Coalition$514,510
Mcdermott Center Dba Haymarket Center$350,000
Indian Prairie School District 204$338,000
Elmhurst Yorkfield Food Pantry$330,000
People's Resource Center$330,000
Greater Family Health$315,000
Loaves And Fishes Community Services$303,250
Little Friends Inc$300,000
Stepping Stones Inc$300,000
Nami DuPage$293,208
Bridge Communities$269,000
Outreach Community Ministries$256,000
Naperville Education Foundation$225,000
Kids Matter Foundation Inc$225,000
Easter Seals DuPage and the Fox Valley Region$225,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $806k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Friends for Lisle Township Inc: $63k → 7%Outreach Community Ministries: $252k → 7%Outreach Ministries: $167k → 7%Loaves and Fishes: $163k → 7%Loaves and Fishes: $163k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 17% of Edward-Elmhurst Healthcare’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 43% of the giving stays in IL; by stated purpose, 38%.

Edward-Elmhurst Healthcarelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.8M · 13 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$7.8M
$146k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+2%

Still filing today

92%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DH
    DUPAGE HEALTH COALITION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $874k · revenue +34%
  • GF
    GREATER FAMILY HEALTH
    3× · 2022–2024 · $874k · revenue +16%
  • BC
    BRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $691k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • FF
    FRIENDS FOR LISLE TOWNSHIP
    one grant, 2022 · $63k · revenue -26%
  • CT
    CHRIST THE KING JESUIT COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $37k
  • CO
    COLLEGE OF DUPAGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $12k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Heartland Community Health Clinic D/B/a Heartland Health Services

Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.

Health
2
Infant Welfare Society of Chicago

Infant welfare society of chicago (iws) (d/b/a iws family health) provides quality medical, dental and behavioral health services for the health, physical and mental development of children and their families in the chicagoland community.

—
3
Community Health Nfp

Community health nfp is an illinois not-for-profit organization created on april 8, 1992, to provide free medical care to those who are medically uninsured and economically disadvantaged.

Health
4
Dayone Pact

Dayone pact is committed to assisting individuals with disabilities live engaged and meaningful lives through independent service coordination.

—
5
Community Health Partnership of Illinois

Strive to improve the health and well being of migrant and seasonal farmworkers and other medically vulnerable populations by providing quality accessable, affordable, and culturally responsive health care within the community we serve.

Health
6
Chicago Family Health Center Inc

Chicago family health center will promote health, work to prevent disease and provide treatment through the delivery of quality, accessible primary healtcare that is culturally sensitive, affordable, and responsive to community and…

—
7
Ageguide Northeastern Illinois Area On Aging

We strive to make aging easier through the development of a network of services for older persons designed to optimize the quality of their lives.

Food & Nutrition
8
Depaul Community Services Inc

To provide residential and rehabilitation services to clients with mental illnesses

Health
9
Sinnissippi Centers Inc

It is the mission of sinnissippi centers, inc. to provide quality, coordinated and responsive behavioral healthcare services to individuals, families and the communities we serve.

Health
10
North Shore Health Care Foundation

To expand equitable health care and healthy living in Cook County and champion solutions through funding, education and advocacy.

Health
11
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
12
Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Little Friends Inc; the most unlike its peers is Endeavor Health Clinical Operations. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
25/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DUPAGE HEALTH COALITION: $874,124 · HealthDUPAGE HEALTH COALITIONGREATER FAMILY HEALTH: $873,985 · HealthGREATER FAMILY HEALTHEASTER SEALS DUPAGE & THE FOX VALLEY REGION: $550,000 · HealthEASTER SEALS DUPAGE & THE F…American Heart Association Inc: $253,300 · HealthAmerican Heart Association …+2 more: $72,500 · HealthIndian Prairie CUSD 204: $950,667 · OtherIndian Prairie CUSD 204McDermott Center: $350,000 · OtherMcDermott CenterPEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER: $330,000 · OtherPEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTERLUTHERAN CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES OF ILLINOIS: $225,000 · OtherLUTHERAN CHILD AND FAMILY SER…TRI-TOWN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $200,000 · OtherTRI-TOWN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIA…WEST SUBURBAN COMMUNITY PANTRY INC: $151,600 · OtherWEST SUBURBAN COMMUNITY PANTR…VNA Health Care: $104,112 · OtherRomeoville Fire Academy Aka Village Of Romeoville: $100,000 · OtherSTEPPING STONES INC: $300,000 · OtherSTEPPING STONES INC+7 more: $84,450 · OtherOUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $674,333 · Human ServicesOUTREACH COMMUNITY M…LOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $628,750 · Human ServicesLOAVES & FISHES COMM…LITTLE FRIENDS INC: $300,000 · Human ServicesLITTLE FRIENDS INCNAMI OF DUPAGE COUNTY ILLINOIS: $293,208 · Human ServicesNAMI OF DUPAGE COUNT…+1 more: $62,500 · Human ServicesBRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC: $690,962 · Housing & ShelterBRIDGE COMMUN…DUPAGE PADS INC: $585,399 · Housing & ShelterDUPAGE PADS I…KIDSMATTER FOUNDATION INC: $560,625 · EducationKIDSMATTER …Naperville Education Foundation: $550,000 · EducationNaperville …+1 more: $12,000 · EducationSOUTHWEST SUBURBAN IMMIGRANT PROJECT: $550,000 · Youth DevelopmentALIVE CENTER NFP: $70,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentELMHURST-YORKFIELD FOOD PANTRY: $330,000 · Food & Nutrition
Health$2,623,909Other$2,795,829Human Services$1,958,791Housing & Shelter$1,276,361Education$1,122,625Youth Development$630,000Food & Nutrition$330,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUPAGE HEALTH COALITION: $874,124 over 3y, 12% of budgetGREATER FAMILY HEALTH: $873,985 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetBRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC: $690,962 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetOUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $674,333 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $628,750 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetDUPAGE PADS INC: $585,399 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetKIDSMATTER FOUNDATION INC: $560,625 over 3y, 35% of budgetEASTER SEALS DUPAGE & THE FOX VALLEY REGION: $550,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetNaperville Education Foundation: $550,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetSOUTHWEST SUBURBAN IMMIGRANT PROJECT: $550,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetMcDermott Center: $350,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER: $330,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetELMHURST-YORKFIELD FOOD PANTRY: $330,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetLITTLE FRIENDS INC: $300,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSTEPPING STONES INC: $300,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetNAMI OF DUPAGE COUNTY ILLINOIS: $293,208 over 1y, 21% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $253,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES OF ILLINOIS: $225,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTRI-TOWN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $200,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetWEST SUBURBAN COMMUNITY PANTRY INC: $151,600 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetVNA Health Care: $104,112 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALIVE CENTER NFP: $70,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $62,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOLLEGE OF DUPAGE FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDAN GIBBONS TURKEY TROT FOUNDATION NFP: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetEndeavor Health Clinical Operations: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetILLINOIS HEALTH AND HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $9,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WILL COUNTY: $8,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE DUPAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAPERVILLE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dupage Community …United Way of Metropo…Naperville Rotary Cha…The Chicago Community…The Bersted FoundationIllinois Children's H…Topfer Family Foundat…Northwestern Memorial…Northern Illinois Foo…Ft Cares FoundationThe a Montgomery Ward…Arthur J Gallagher Fo…
The Dupage Community FoundationIL32× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dupage Community Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Naperville Rotary Charities Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · The Bersted Foundation · Illinois Children's Healthcare Foundation · Topfer Family Foundation · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group · Northern Illinois Food Bank · Ft Cares Foundation · The a Montgomery Ward Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edward-Elmhurst Healthcare funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edward-Elmhurst Healthcare. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edward-Elmhurst Healthcare’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home