Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Edward & Mary Ellen Darling Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$174k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 50% of EDWARD & MARY ELLEN DARLING FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $140k
$7,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUSSON UNIVERSITY$30,000
GOOD SHEPPERD FOOD BANK$25,000
BANGOR AREA HOMELESS SHELTER$25,000
ST JOSEPH HOSPITAL$15,000
MOOD AND MEMORY CLINIC$15,000
CANCER CARE OF MAINE$10,000
JOHN BAPST MEMORIAL HS$10,000
MDI HOSPITAL$10,000
SARAH'S HOUSE$7,500
ST JOHN'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL$5,000
MAINE VETERANS PROJECT$3,200
ST JUDE RESEARCH HOSPITAL$3,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$3,000
BANGOR AREA RECOVERY NETWORK$3,000
SHRINERS HOSPITALS CHILDREN$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%MAINE VETERANS PROJECT: $3k → 15%MAINE VETERANS PROJECT: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$912k · 19 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
1

Total granted

$912k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+30%

Still filing today

53%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HU
    Husson University
    6× · 2020–2025 · $305k · revenue +16%
  • TB
    THE BANGOR AREA HOMELESS SHELTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $98k · revenue +5%
  • SJ
    St Joseph Hospital
    5× · 2021–2025 · $70k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • BF
    BRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +30%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Penobscot Bay Medical Center

Penobscot Bay Medical Center (PBMC) is an acute care hospital that offers inpatient and outpatient care, diagnostic, therapeutic and rehabilitative services, patient and community education, and a full range of specialty services through…

2
Maine Behavioral Healthcare

Maine Behavioral Healthcare provides a seamless and compassionate continuum of care through a community of providers collaborating to promote recovery and the overall mental and physical well-being of those we are privileged to serve.

3
Bangor Theological Seminary
Religion
4
Bridgton Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.

Health
5
MaineHealth

MaineHealth is a voluntary, not-for-profit community and referral system of hospitals, dedicated to providing high quality health care services to all persons who seek care regardless of their sex, race, religion, age, color, sexual…

Health
6
Southern Maine Health Care

Southern Maine Health Care exists to improve the health and health care of the communities we serve.

7
The Memorial Hospital at North Conway Nh

The memorial hospital at north conway, n.h. (memorial hospital) provides healthcare services to the residents and visitors of the mount washington valley area of new hampshire as well as western maine.

Health
8
Bangor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

It is the mission of the Bangor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center to provide the highest level of care with the highest level of quality, competency and professionalism that focuses on the health andwell-being of the community it serves.

Health
9
Community Health and Nursing Services

Community Health and Nursing Services (CHANS) provides home health andcommunity health promotion services in Brunswick, Bath, andsurrounding communities.

Health
10
Mount Auburn Hospital

The mission of new england baptist hospital (nebh or hospital) is the operation and maintenance of an acute care, orthopedic specialty hospital and provision of all services related thereto for the benefit of patients. nebh strives to…

Health
11
Western Maine Health Care Corp

Ensured a high quality, accessible, affordable and appropriate integrated health care system to improve the health and well being of the community.

12
Penobscot Community Health Center

Penobscot Community Health Center (PCHC) is a non-profit organization incorporated in 1997 that is governed by a Board of community volunteers and is the largest Federally Qualified Health Center in Maine. PCHC is driven by its mission…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birch Bay Retirement Village and the most unlike its peers is Brightfocus Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GOOD SHEPPERD FOOD BANK — $102,500 · OtherGOOD SHEPPERD FOOD BANKTHE BANGOR AREA HOMELESS SHELTER — $97,500 · OtherTHE BANGOR AREA HOMELESS SHELTERALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH — $75,000 · OtherALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCHJOHN BAPST MEMORIAL HS — $50,000 · OtherJOHN BAPST MEMORIAL HSCANCER CARE OF MAINE — $35,000 · OtherCANCER CARE OF MAINESARAH'S HOUSE — $32,500 · OtherSARAH'S HOUSEST JOHN'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL — $30,000 · OtherST JOHN'S CATHOLIC SCHOOLMOOD AND MEMORY CLINIC — $30,000 · OtherMOOD AND MEMORY CLINIC+3 more — $19,450 · OtherHusson University — $305,000 · EducationHusson UniversityBangor Area Recovery Network Inc — $31,000 · EducationBangor Area Recovery Network Inc+1 more — $11,000 · EducationSt Joseph Hospital — $70,000 · HealthSt Joseph Ho…BRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION — $25,000 · HealthBRIGHTFOCUS …MOUNT DESERT ISLAND HOSPITAL — $10,000 · HealthMOUNT DESERT…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $7,000 · Human ServicesMAINE VETERANS PROJECT — $5,700 · Human ServicesMAINE DISCOVERY MUSEUM — $5,000 · Arts & CultureBangor Humane Society — $5,000 · Animals
Other$471,950Education$347,000Health$105,000Human Services$12,700Arts & Culture$5,000Animals$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHusson University — $305,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BANGOR AREA HOMELESS SHELTER — $97,500 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetSt Joseph Hospital — $70,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBangor Area Recovery Network Inc — $31,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT DESERT ISLAND HOSPITAL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAINE VETERANS PROJECT — $5,700 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMAINE DISCOVERY MUSEUM — $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBangor Humane Society — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBIRCH BAY RETIREMENT VILLAGE — $2,450 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Husson University
  • Who funds THE BANGOR AREA HOMELESS SHELTER
  • Who funds St Joseph Hospital
  • Who funds Bangor Area Recovery Network Inc
  • Who funds BRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MOUNT DESERT ISLAND HOSPITAL
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds MAINE VETERANS PROJECT
  • Who funds MAINE DISCOVERY MUSEUM
  • Who funds Bangor Humane Society
  • Who funds BIRCH BAY RETIREMENT VILLAGE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stephen & Tabitha King Foundation IncNY19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stephen & Tabitha King Foundation Inc · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Lawrence Family Foundation · Fisher Charitable Foundation · Davis Family Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Edward & Mary Ellen Darling Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Edward & Mary Ellen Darling Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Edward & Mary Ellen Darling Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph