Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edward & Dorothy Kendall Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$218k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$106k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Environment$882kArts & Culture$132kReligion$90kAnimals$70kRecreation & Sports$55kEducation$41kHousing & Shelter$32kHealth$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $106k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Edisto Island Open Land Trust$105,911
SC Historical Society$25,000
Society of Cincinatti$20,000
Broad River Arts Center$20,000
YMCA Camp Greenville$10,000
St Francis Episcopal Church$10,000
Central Carolina Community Found$5,000
Homeless No More$5,000
Red Door Community Inc$5,000
St Johns Episcopal Church Congaree$5,000
St Thomas Episcopal Church$5,000
Candyman Homeless Outreach$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%American Red Cross Lowcountry SC ch: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 10 repeat orgs$135k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
12

Total granted

$1.2M
$90k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+3%

Still filing today

40%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureEducationHealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EI
    EDISTO ISLAND OPEN LAND TRUST
    6× · 2020–2025 · $608k · revenue +575%
  • CH
    CANDYMAN HOMELESS OUTREACH
    4× · 2021–2025 · $8k · revenue +20%
  • CF
    Columbia Film Society
    2× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • SM
    St Matthews Parish
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • CS
    CENTRAL SC HABITAT FOR HUMANITYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $14k · revenue +45%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Carolina Trust
Philanthropy
2
Communityworks Inc

Communityworks is a publicly supported organization and certified community development financial institution that provides funding to promote affordable housing and community development to help stabilize low wealth families and…

Housing & Shelter
3
South Carolina Public Interest Foundation
Crime & Legal
4
The Palmetto Trust for Historic Preservation Inc

To protect and preserve buildings of architectural and historial significance in South Carolina.

Arts & Culture
5
Foundation for the Carolinas

Inspiring philanthropy and strengthening our region through innovative community initiatives and quality services to donors and constituents.

Philanthropy
6
South Carolina National Heritage Corridor

The organization's primary mission is a grassroots initiative that advances sustainable development of natural, cultural and historic resources for enhanced quality of life and economic revitalization of communities in south carolina.

Arts & Culture
7
Columbia College

Columbia college provides educational opportunities that develop students' capacity for critical thought and expression, life-long learning, acceptance of personal responsibilty, and commitment to service and social justice.

Education
8
Three Rivers Land Trust Inc

Protect and conserve land, natural areas, rural landscapes, family farms and historic places within north carolina's heartland

Environment
9
East Cooper Land Trust

East cooper land trust is a community-supported organization devoted to conserving land to benefit people and the environment both now and forever.

—
10
Community Foundation of the Lowcountry

The Community Foundation's mission is strengthening community by connecting people, resources, and needs.

Philanthropy
11
Lowcountry Land Trust Inc

To protect land and water forever, nurture relationships between people and place, and connect conservation to community.

Environment
12
Conestee Foundation Inc

Through responsible stewardship of our unique ecological resource, we provide inclusive opportunities for meaningful connection, discovery, and education in nature.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Carolina Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Candyman Homeless Outreach. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EDISTO ISLAND OPEN LAND TRUST: $607,528 · EnvironmentEDISTO ISLAND OPEN LAND TRUSTCONGAREE LAND TRUST: $274,124 · EnvironmentCONGAREE LAND TRUSTSC HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $100,000 · OtherSC HISTORICAL SOCIETYSociety of Cincinatti: $70,000 · OtherSociety of CincinattiYMCA Camp Greenville: $50,000 · OtherYMCA Camp GreenvilleVirginia Wingard United Methodist C: $35,000 · OtherVirginia Wingard United Methodist CCentral Carolina Community Found: $30,801 · OtherCentral Carolina Community FoundSt Matthews Parish: $25,000 · OtherSt Matthews ParishBROAD RIVER ARTS CENTER INC: $20,000 · OtherST THOMAS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherCENTRAL SC HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $14,258 · Other+12 more: $54,000 · Other+12 moreCENTRAL CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 · Human ServicesDAVIS & ELKINS COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationCANDYMAN HOMELESS OUTREACH: $8,000 · ReligionRED DOOR COMMUNITY INC: $5,000 · Health
Environment$881,652Other$414,059Philanthropy$10,000Human Services$10,000Education$10,000Religion$8,000Health$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEDISTO ISLAND OPEN LAND TRUST: $607,528 over 6y, 10% of budgetCONGAREE LAND TRUST: $274,124 over 3y, 11% of budgetCENTRAL SC HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $14,258 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCENTRAL CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAVIS & ELKINS COLLEGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANDYMAN HOMELESS OUTREACH: $8,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetRED DOOR COMMUNITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetColumbia Film Society: $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PALMETTO OPERA: $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EDISTO ISLAND OPEN LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds CONGAREE LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL SC HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds DAVIS & ELKINS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CANDYMAN HOMELESS OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds RED DOOR COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Homeless No More Inc ↗
  • Who funds Columbia Film Society ↗
  • Who funds THE PALMETTO OPERA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Carolina Community FoundationSC15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Carolina Community Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edward & Dorothy Kendall Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edward & Dorothy Kendall Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edward & Dorothy Kendall’s filings →

    More from the funding graph