Skip to content

· Private foundation

Educational Promise Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$835k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$175k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$3.3MPublic Benefit$181kReligion$170kYouth Development$150kSocial Science$3k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $753k
$50,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ED CHOICE$175,000
STAND TOGETHER TRUST$175,000
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$77,500
CHABAD LUBAVITCH$75,000
AMERICAN FEDERATION FOR CHILDREN'S$50,000
FRONTIER INSTITUTE$50,000
FOUNDATION AGAINST INTOLERANCE RACI$50,000
PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS$50,000
EDUCATION REFORM NOW$50,000
PETRA ACADEMY$45,000
NCSL FOUNDATION FOR STATE LEGISLATO$25,000
ACE SCHOLARSHIPS$10,000
MONTANA FAMILY INSTITUTE$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 59% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CITIZENS SCHOOLS INC: $50k → 16%BLUUM: $50k → 8%MONTANA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $3k → 9%CHABAD LUBAVITCH: $75k → 10%UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $225k → 10%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF COACHELLA V: $50k → 11%FOUNDATION AGAINST INTOLERANCE RACI: $50k → 17%AMERICAN FEDERATION FOR CHILDREN: $50k → 14%NAT'L ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC CHARTER S: $75k → 14%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $200k → 14%STAND TOGETHER TRUST: $175k → 19%KU ENDOWMENT: $64k → 15%Habitat for Humanity: $60k → 22%NCSL FOUNDATION FOR STATE LEGISLATO: $25k → 12%ED CHOICE: $175k → 16%JOHNS HOPKINS SCHOOL OF EDUCATION: $70k → 19%PIONEER INSTITUTE: $50k → 16%PETRA ACADEMY: $120k → 10%UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $219k → 10%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF COACHELLA V: $50k → 11%EDUCATION REFORM NOW: $50k → 17%PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS: $50k → 14%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $150k → 14%STAND TOGETHER TRUST: $125k → 19%KU ENDOWMENT: $30k → 15%Habitat for Humanity: $27k → 22%ED CHOICE: $75k → 16%PIONEER INSTITUTE: $50k → 16%PETRA ACADAMY: $75k → 10%UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $200k → 10%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF COACHELLA V: $50k → 11%NAT'L ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC CHARTER S: $25k → 14%KU ENDOWMENT: $29k → 15%ED CHOICE: $50k → 16%PIONEER INSTITUTE: $50k → 16%PETRA ACADEMY: $45k → 10%UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $178k → 10%AMERICAN FEDERATION FOR CHILDREN'S: $50k → 14%KU CENTER FOR RESEARCH -- KUCRL: $50k → 15%PIONEER INSTITUTE: $25k → 16%PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS: $25k → 14%KU CENTER FOR RESEARCH -- KUCRL: $50k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MT
MI
NY
MA
IN
CA
CO
MD
KS
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 14 repeat orgs$500k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against -37% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$2.9M
$245k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
-37%

Still filing today

43%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $255k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPublic BenefitSocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UH
    UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL
    4× · 2017–2021 · $822k · revenue +21%
  • EI
    EdChoice Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $300k · revenue +10%
  • PA
    PETRA ACADEMY INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $240k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • JH
    JOHNS HOPKINS SCHOOL OF EDUCATION
    one grant, 2024 · $70k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FEDERATION FOR CHILDREN
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • BI
    BLUUM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -37%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
2
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Sage International School of Boise

Public education (local education agency) - sage international school engages students within an inclusive ib learning community, challenging all members to take risks and contribute locally and globally through open-minded inquiry.

Education
6
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
7
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
8
American Council On Education

Ace leads higher education with a united vision for the future, galvanizing our members to make change. the council collaborates across the sector to design solutions for today's challenges, serves the needs of a diverse student…

Education
9
Mastery Charter High School

All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.

Education
10
The Seed Public Charter School of Washington Dc

The seed public charter school of washington, dc is a public college-preparatory boarding school whose primary mission is to provide an outstanding intensive educational program that prepares children, both academically and socially, for…

Education
11
Bullis School

Bullis school provides a student-centered balanced experience in academics, arts, athletics and community service. bullis uniquely prepares all students to become caring citizens and creative, critical thinkers who will thrive in…

Education
12
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is EdChoice Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $822,127 · EducationUNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOLHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $350,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGEEdChoice Inc: $300,000 · EducationEdChoice IncPETRA ACADEMY INC: $240,000 · EducationPETRA ACADEMY INCPIONEER INSTITUTE INC: $175,000 · EducationPIONEER INSTITUTE INCALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $110,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $77,500 · Education+4 more: $200,000 · Education+4 moreSTAND TOGETHER TRUST: $300,000 · OtherSTAND TOGETHER TRUSTCHABAD LUBAVITCH: $170,000 · OtherCHABAD LUBAVITCHBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF COACHELLA V: $150,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF COACHELLA VKU ENDOWMENT: $122,650 · OtherKU ENDOWMENTNAT'L ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC CHARTER S: $100,000 · OtherNAT'L ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC CHARTER SKU CENTER FOR RESEARCH -- KUCRL: $99,800 · OtherKU CENTER FOR RESEARCH -- KUCRLHabitat for Humanity: $87,392 · OtherHabitat for HumanityPUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS: $75,000 · OtherPUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLSJOHNS HOPKINS SCHOOL OF EDUCATION: $70,275 · OtherAMERICAN FEDERATION FOR CHILDREN: $50,000 · OtherFOUNDATION AGAINST INTOLERANCE RACI: $50,000 · Other+2 more: $50,000 · OtherFRONTIER INSTITUTE INC: $181,000 · Public BenefitMontana Family Institute Inc: $2,500 · Social Science
Education$2,274,627Other$1,325,117Public Benefit$181,000Social Science$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $822,127 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $350,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEdChoice Inc: $300,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetPETRA ACADEMY INC: $240,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetFRONTIER INSTITUTE INC: $181,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetPIONEER INSTITUTE INC: $175,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $110,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $77,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUUM INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCITIZEN SCHOOLS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds EdChoice Inc ↗
  • Who funds PETRA ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRONTIER INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds PIONEER INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BLUUM INC ↗
  • Who funds CITIZEN SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION REFORM NOW INC ↗
  • Who funds Montana Family Institute Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Beth and Ravenel Curry FoundationPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Beth and Ravenel Curry Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Educational Promise Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Educational Promise Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Citizen Schools Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Educational Promise Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Educational Promise Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Educational Promise’s filings →

More from the funding graph