Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edna Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$461k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$165k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.4MArts & Culture$196kReligion$190kHousing & Shelter$85kEducation$50kRecreation & Sports$50kHuman Services$48kEnvironment$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $390k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PSC - PARTNERS SEEKING A CURE$165,000
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$125,000
LIFEBRIDGE NORTH SHORE$50,000
HAMILTON-WENHAM ATHLETIC FACILITY IMPROVEMENT (HWAFIC)$50,000
FIRST CHURCH WENHAM$25,000
FAMILY PROMISE NORTH SHORE BOSTON INC$20,000
FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY$10,000
WEXFORD PLANTATION CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$10,000
ANNISQUAM VILLAGE CHURCH$5,000
THE ALS ASSOCIATION - WALK TO DEFEAT ALS$500
PAN MASS CHALLENGE - THE JIMMY FUND$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $133k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $200 → 8%WEXFORD PLANTATION CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%WEXFORD PLANTATION CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%WEXFORD PLANTATION CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%WEXFORD PLANTATION CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%WEXFORD PLANTATION CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%YMCA OF NORTH SHORE: $25k → 10%FAMILY PROMISE NORTH SHORE BOSTON INC: $20k → 10%FAMILY PROMISE NORTH SHORE BOSTON INC: $10k → 10%FAMILY PROMISE NORTH SHORE BOSTON INC: $5k → 10%LIFEBRIDGE NORTH SHORE: $50k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MA
NJ
CO
VA
SC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 12 repeat orgs$313k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
17

Total granted

$1.8M
$213k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+62%

Still filing today

42%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureInternationalEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PSC PARTNERS SEEKING A CURE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $730k · revenue +140%
  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE NORTH SHORE BOSTON INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $35k · revenue +5%
  • WF
    WEXFORD FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $23k · revenue +131%

Funded once

  • AV
    ANNISQUAM VILLAGE HALL ASSOCIATION - LEGACY FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • MG
    MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • TS
    THE SAWYER LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -59%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
2
Mass General Brigham Incorporated

Patient care, teaching, research and serving the community.

Health
3
Greater Lawrence Family Health Center Inc

Glhfc's mission is to improve and maintain the health of individuals and families in the merrimack valley by providing a network of high quality, comprehensive health care services and by training health care professionals who can respond…

Health
4
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
5
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
6
Seed Global Health

Our mission is to expand access to quality care and improve health outcomes for all. we achieve our mission by partnering deeply to strengthen the health systems in the countries where we work, with a special focus on strengthening the…

Education
7
Mass General Brigham Health Plan Inc

Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.

Health
8
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
9
The Mercy Hospital Inc

We, trinity health of new england and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. the mercy hospital is a member of trinity health of new england…

Health
10
Massachusetts Medical Society

To advance medical knowledge, to develop and maintain the highest professional and ethical standards of medical practice and health care, and to promote medical institutions formed on liberal principles for the health, benefit, and welfare…

—
11
Social Venture Partners Boston Inc

Svp boston, a group of diverse, highly skilled professionals, collaborates with carefully selected boston area nonprofits by investing their time, skills, and money to increase the capacity of these nonprofits to deliver meaningful social…

Philanthropy
12
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Annisquam Village Players. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PSC PARTNERS SEEKING A CURE: $730,250 · OtherPSC PARTNERS SEEKING A CUREMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $625,053 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITALFIRST CHURCH WENHAM: $115,000 · OtherFIRST CHURCH WENHAMTHIRD ANNISQUAM PARISH IN GLOUCESTER: $67,000 · Other+13 more: $198,588 · Other+13 moreFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $145,818 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $250 · Arts & CultureTHE SALEM MISSION INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE NORTH SHORE BOSTON INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF THE NORTH SHORE INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesWEXFORD FOUNDATION: $22,500 · Human Services+1 more: $200 · Human ServicesTHE SAWYER LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · EducationFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $1,000 · InternationalGlobal Impact: $800 · InternationalAmerican Liver Foundation: $1,030 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 · HealthRonald McDonald House Global: $100 · HealthSUDBURY COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $100 · Food & NutritionBUDDY DOG HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $100 · Animals
Other$1,735,891Arts & Culture$146,068Human Services$132,700Education$50,000International$1,800Health$1,230Food & Nutrition$100Animals$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPSC PARTNERS SEEKING A CURE: $730,250 over 8y, 8.7% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $145,818 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SALEM MISSION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE SAWYER LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE NORTH SHORE BOSTON INC: $35,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetYMCA OF THE NORTH SHORE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEXFORD FOUNDATION: $22,500 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetTHE VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Liver Foundation: $1,030 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGlobal Impact: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAnnisquam Village Players: $250 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUDBURY COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUDDY DOG HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PSC PARTNERS SEEKING A CURE ↗
  • Who funds FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds THE SALEM MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SAWYER LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE NORTH SHORE BOSTON INC ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF THE NORTH SHORE INC ↗
  • Who funds WEXFORD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds American Liver Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds Global Impact ↗
  • Who funds Annisquam Village Players ↗
  • Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗
  • Who funds SUDBURY COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds BUDDY DOG HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Global ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Salem Five Charitable Foundation IncMA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Salem Five Charitable Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edna Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edna Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Ymca of the North Shore Inc: 6% of income from government
  • The Salem Mission Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Edna’s filings →

More from the funding graph