Skip to content
Eden Housing Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Eden Housing Inc

Eden housing, inc.

$14M
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5.1M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$72MEducation$41kYouth Development$31kPublic Safety & Disaster$20k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
  • $250k+8 grants · $14M
$350,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$573M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EDEN SOUTH BAY INC$5,114,202
NEW DEL NIDO LP$3,822,105
EDEN HOUSING MANAGEMENT INC$2,850,000
EDEN HOUSING RESIDENT SERVICES INC$1,150,000
NON-PROFIT HOUSING ASSOCIATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA$360,000
SPARKS WAY COMMONS$350,000
EDEN DEVELOPMENT INC$293,306
EAST LAUREL LP$251,716
UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION$25,000
OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND$18,080
NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING ASSOCIATION$7,200
SAN RAFAEL SENIOR LP$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GENERATION HOUSING: $20k → 10%BAY AREA NEIGHBORS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING: $50k → 12%NEW WAY HOMES INC: $10k → 13%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING ASSOCIATION: $7k → 11%HOUSING CALIFORNIA: $7k → 12%LARKING STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$53M · 21 repeat orgs$19M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
44

Total granted

$53M
$15M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+7%

Still filing today

62%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesEducationHealthCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EH
    EDEN HOUSING MANAGEMENT INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $15M · revenue +73% · 25% of their budget
  • EI
    EDEN INVESTMENTS INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $14M · revenue +784% · 66% of their budget
  • ES
    EDEN SOUTH BAY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $6.7M · revenue +57% · 81% of their budget

Funded once

  • VP
    VALLEJO PSH LP
    one grant, 2023 · $12M
  • CA
    CAMPHORA ASSOCIATES LP
    one grant, 2017 · $719k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $600k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified
2
Hip Housing Development Corporation

To alleviate and improve the housing condition of the needy, physically or mentally handicapped, elderly persons and others whose housing needs are not being adequately met in San Mateo County, CA.

Housing & Shelter
3
Hip Housing Affordable Ventures Inc

To benefit and support Human Investment Project, Inc., a related California nonprofit public benefit corporation, and its exempt purpose of improving housing and lives of people in its community.

Housing & Shelter
4
San Francisco Housing Action Coalition

Promote public understanding of policies supporting the creation of well-designed, well-located housing at all levels of affordability for residents of the Bay Area, California.

Housing & Shelter
5
Mutual Housing California Formerly Known As Sacramento Mutual Housing Association

The mission of mutual housing california is to develop, manage, and support sustainable affordable housing where residents are partners in advancing equitable communities.

Housing & Shelter
6
Sky Parkway Mutual Housing Corporation

To provide affordable housing.

Housing & Shelter
7
Sacramento Neighborhood Housing Services Inc

To improve and restore district-wide neighborhoods for the benefit of the residents.

Housing & Shelter
8
Howard Street Development Corporation

To provide housing for low income persons, and to support tenderloin neighborhood development corporation in carrying out its purpose.

Housing & Shelter
9
Burbank Housingsr Corporation

To own and operate affordable rental housing.

—
10
Mutual Housing Management

To be an exceptional steward of the portfolio of multifamily housing owned by mutual housing california and other 501(c)(3) entities (or limited partnerships in which a 501(c)(3) entity is a general partner) to support long-term…

Housing & Shelter
11
Homeownership San Francisco dba Home Sf

The Organization is a citywide collaborative of housing counseling agencies that helps diverse and underserved households achieve and sustain homeownership in San Francisco.

—
12
Heritage Housing Partners

To promote historic preservation and neighborhood revitalization by developing, owning, and operating rental or for sale low-income housing property.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Way Homes Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Urban Land Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/31
Grantees still filing
18/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EDEN HOUSING MANAGEMENT INC: $15,147,108 · OtherEDEN HOUSING MANAGEMENT INCVALLEJO PSH LP: $12,293,629 · OtherVALLEJO PSH LPEDEN SOUTH BAY INC: $6,710,588 · OtherEDEN SOUTH BAY INCGOTTA HAVE FAITH: $4,008,751 · OtherGOTTA HAVE FAITHNEW DEL NIDO LP: $3,822,105 · OtherNEW DEL NIDO LP+40 more: $5,793,512 · Other+40 moreEDEN INVESTMENTS INC: $13,964,006 · Housing & ShelterEDEN INVESTMENTS INCEDEN DEVELOPMENT INC: $3,620,577 · Housing & ShelterEDEN DEVELOPMENT INC+9 more: $748,514 · Housing & ShelterEDEN HOUSING RESIDENT SERVICES INC: $5,479,280 · HealthTHE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $108,670 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $75,000 · EducationCalifornia Homebuilding Foundation: $40,850 · EducationPROJECT DESTINED INC: $30,833 · EducationNPH Action Fund: $50,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTER: $20,000 · Human ServicesNEW WAY HOMES INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSN: $7,200 · Human ServicesHOUSING CALIFORNIA INC: $6,965 · Human ServicesLarkin Street Youth Services: $6,000 · Human ServicesHomes for San Diegans: $50,000 · Community ImprovementTHE VACAVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE: $13,950 · Environment
Other$47,775,693Housing & Shelter$18,333,097Health$5,479,280Education$255,353Human Services$100,165Community Improvement$50,000Youth Development$25,000Environment$13,950

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEDEN HOUSING MANAGEMENT INC: $15,147,108 over 7y, 25% of budgetEDEN INVESTMENTS INC: $13,964,006 over 7y, 66% of budgetEDEN SOUTH BAY INC: $6,710,588 over 8y, 81% of budgetEDEN HOUSING RESIDENT SERVICES INC: $5,479,280 over 8y, 16% of budgetEDEN DEVELOPMENT INC: $3,620,577 over 8y, 76% of budgetNON-PROFIT HOUSING ASSOCIATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $431,500 over 7y, 4.5% of budgetSPM AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORPORATION: $168,688 over 1y, 100% of budgetEDEN SOUTH COUNTY INC: $123,038 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetTHE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $108,670 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHomes for San Diegans: $50,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetNPH Action Fund: $50,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCalifornia Homebuilding Foundation: $40,850 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetTHE HOUSING PARTNERSHIP NETWORK INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH COUNTY HOUSING CORPORATION: $33,865 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetPROJECT DESTINED INC: $30,833 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCALIFORNIA HOUSING CONSORTIUM: $30,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetMP CAN DO INC: $25,408 over 1y, 52% of budgetTHE VACAVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSV HOME: $25,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAYWOOD APARTMENTS INC: $17,641 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetTHE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE: $13,950 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW WAY HOMES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetMAKE ROOM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetEDEN VACAVILLE HOUSING INC: $7,777 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSING LEADERSHIP COUNCIL OF SAN MATEO COUNTY: $7,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSN: $7,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSING CALIFORNIA INC: $6,965 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLarkin Street Youth Services: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EDEN HOUSING MANAGEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds EDEN INVESTMENTS INC ↗
  • Who funds EDEN SOUTH BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds EDEN HOUSING RESIDENT SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds EDEN DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds NON-PROFIT HOUSING ASSOCIATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds SPARKS WAY COMMONS INC ↗
  • Who funds SPM AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds EDEN SOUTH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Homes for San Diegans ↗
  • Who funds NPH Action Fund ↗
  • Who funds California Homebuilding Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE HOUSING PARTNERSHIP NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH COUNTY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT DESTINED INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA HOUSING CONSORTIUM ↗
  • Who funds MP CAN DO INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Midpen Housing Corpor…Baywood Apartments IncEden Housing Resident…Merritt Community Cap…Sunlight GivingBridge Housing Corpor…United Way of the Bay…The David and Lucile …The San Francisco Fou…Local Initiatives Sup…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Bank of America C…
Midpen Housing CorporationCA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Midpen Housing Corporation · Baywood Apartments Inc · Eden Housing Resident Services Inc · Merritt Community Capital Corporation · Sunlight Giving · Bridge Housing Corporation · United Way of the Bay Area · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eden Housing Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eden Housing Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • The Housing Partnership Network Inc: 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eden Housing’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home