· Public charity
Eden Housing Inc
Eden housing, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
- $250k+8 grants · $14M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EDEN SOUTH BAY INC | $5,114,202 |
| NEW DEL NIDO LP | $3,822,105 |
| EDEN HOUSING MANAGEMENT INC | $2,850,000 |
| EDEN HOUSING RESIDENT SERVICES INC | $1,150,000 |
| NON-PROFIT HOUSING ASSOCIATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA | $360,000 |
| SPARKS WAY COMMONS | $350,000 |
| EDEN DEVELOPMENT INC | $293,306 |
| EAST LAUREL LP | $251,716 |
| UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND | $18,080 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING ASSOCIATION | $7,200 |
| SAN RAFAEL SENIOR LP | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.4M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EHEDEN HOUSING MANAGEMENT INC7× · 2018–2024 · $15M · revenue +73% · 25% of their budget
- EIEDEN INVESTMENTS INC7× · 2017–2023 · $14M · revenue +784% · 66% of their budget
- ESEDEN SOUTH BAY INC8× · 2017–2024 · $6.7M · revenue +57% · 81% of their budget
Funded once
- VPVALLEJO PSH LPone grant, 2023 · $12M
- CACAMPHORA ASSOCIATES LPone grant, 2017 · $719k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $600k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.
To alleviate and improve the housing condition of the needy, physically or mentally handicapped, elderly persons and others whose housing needs are not being adequately met in San Mateo County, CA.
To benefit and support Human Investment Project, Inc., a related California nonprofit public benefit corporation, and its exempt purpose of improving housing and lives of people in its community.
Promote public understanding of policies supporting the creation of well-designed, well-located housing at all levels of affordability for residents of the Bay Area, California.
The mission of mutual housing california is to develop, manage, and support sustainable affordable housing where residents are partners in advancing equitable communities.
To provide affordable housing.
To improve and restore district-wide neighborhoods for the benefit of the residents.
To provide housing for low income persons, and to support tenderloin neighborhood development corporation in carrying out its purpose.
To be an exceptional steward of the portfolio of multifamily housing owned by mutual housing california and other 501(c)(3) entities (or limited partnerships in which a 501(c)(3) entity is a general partner) to support long-term…
The Organization is a citywide collaborative of housing counseling agencies that helps diverse and underserved households achieve and sustain homeownership in San Francisco.
To own and operate affordable rental housing.
Own and operate a low-income housing project
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Way Homes Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Urban Land Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EDEN HOUSING MANAGEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds EDEN INVESTMENTS INC ↗
- Who funds EDEN SOUTH BAY INC ↗
- Who funds EDEN HOUSING RESIDENT SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds EDEN DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds NON-PROFIT HOUSING ASSOCIATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds SPARKS WAY COMMONS INC ↗
- Who funds SPM AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds EDEN SOUTH COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds THE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NPH Action Fund ↗
- Who funds Homes for San Diegans ↗
- Who funds California Homebuilding Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE HOUSING PARTNERSHIP NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH COUNTY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PROJECT DESTINED INC ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA HOUSING CONSORTIUM ↗
- Who funds MP CAN DO INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Midpen Housing Corporation · Baywood Apartments Inc · Eden Housing Resident Services Inc · Merritt Community Capital Corporation · Sunlight Giving · Bridge Housing Corporation · United Way of the Bay Area · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Eden Housing Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Housing Partnership Network Inc — 10% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.