Skip to content

· Private foundation

Eddy Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$65kRecreation & Sports$15kFood & Nutrition$7kEducation$6kReligion$5kArts & Culture$2kHuman Services$1kCommunity Improvement$665Other$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$750
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPLIT ROCK$7,840
FALLBROOK LAND CONSERVANCY$1,000
Wild Farm Alliance$750
The Rewilding Institute$500
Hemlock Society$150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 68% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HERON DANCE ART STUDIO: $2k → 10%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $50 → 8%Occidental Arts Ecology Center: $135 → 9%Wildcoast: $200 → 11%WILDFARM ALLIANCE: $5k → 13%SPLIT ROCK: $8k → 14%CATALINA ISLAND CONSERVANCY: $238 → 14%UC Davis: $100 → 16%ADKAction: $2k → 13%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1k → 17%Saginaw Basin Land Conservancy: $5k → 14%Slow Money NC: $250 → 9%Northeast Wilderness TrusT: $3k → 9%HUNTINGTON PUBLIC LIBRARY: $1k → 10%OLD GROWTH FOREST NETWORK: $5k → 10%Hilltop Center for Spiritual Living: $5k → 11%WILDFARM ALLIANCE: $250 → 13%SPLIT ROCK: $3k → 14%KISS THE Ground: $560 → 14%CHAMPLAIN AREA TRAILS: $5k → 13%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $50 → 17%Saginaw Basin Land Conservancy: $5k → 14%Northeast Wilderness TrusT: $500 → 9%Friends of the Richmond Free Librar: $3k → 10%OLD GROWTH FOREST NETWORK: $5k → 10%FALLBROOK ART CULTURE CENTER: $50 → 11%WILDFARM ALLIANCE: $100 → 13%CHAMPLAIN AREA TRAILS: $5k → 13%OLD GROWTH FOREST NETWORK: $5k → 10%CHAMPLAIN AREA TRAILS: $3k → 13%OLD GROWTH FOREST NETWORK: $500 → 10%CHAMPLAIN AREA TRAILS: $2k → 13%LAKESIDE PRESCHOOL: $2k → 13%Makers Guild Inc: $1k → 13%LAKESIDE PRESCHOOL: $200 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MI
NY
CA
MD
DE
NM
NC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$85k · 10 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +254% since the first grant, against +87% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
15

Total granted

$85k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+254%
+87%

Still filing today

70%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OF
    OLD-GROWTH FOREST NETWORK INC
    4× · 2017–2023 · $16k · revenue +254%
  • CA
    CHAMPLAIN AREA TRAILS INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $15k · revenue +383%
  • SB
    SAGINAW BASIN LAND CONSERVANCY
    2× · 2017–2019 · $10k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • HC
    Hilltop Center for Spiritual Living
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • FO
    Friends of the Richmond Free Librar
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • HD
    HERON DANCE ART STUDIO
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
2
Glacial Lakes Conservancy Inc

Glacial Lakes Conservancy, as a land trust, is a nonprofit organization that, as part of its mission, actively works to conserve land by undertaking or assisting in land or conservation easement acquisitions.

Environment
3
Woodstock Land Conservancy Inc

Acquire land and easements to preserve and enhance the open lands, forests, water resources, scenic areas and historical sights of the Woodstock, NY area. Steward protected lands and offer educational programs and events regarding nature…

Environment
4
Land Conservancy of Ridgefield Inc

The Land Conservancy of Ridgefield, Inc. ("the Land Conservancy"), founded in 1967, preserves and protects, for the general benefit of the public, Ridgefield, Connecticut's natural resources including land and water resources, the plant…

Environment
5
Siskiyou Land Conservancy

The Siskiyou Land Conservancy is a state and federally approved non-profit organization that assists landowners who want to protect the natural values of their land, either through purchase or establishment of conservation easements.

Environment
6
Golden State Land Conservancy Inc

Promote conservation easements and resource management plans that conserve agriculture lands, forestlands, wildlife habitat, open space, and other natural resources, in perpetuity.

Environment
7
North American Land Trust

The mission of north american land trust is to permanently conserve and steward natural and cultural resources through innovative land preservation partnerships.

Environment
8
North Coast Land Conservancy Inc

The north coast land conservancy serves as a resource for northwest oregon coastal communities and landowners to conserve and protect land in perpetuity for its ecologocial and cultural values.

Environment
9
Sageland Collaborative

To provide science-based strategies for wildlife and land conservation.

Environment
10
Natural Areas Land Conservancy

Land conservation and restoration for public benefit

Environment
11
Northern California Regional Land Trust

The purpose of the organization is to monitor, manage, and preserve conservation easements it stewards in northern california. the organization acquires conservation easements in land exhibiting important natural features to protect and…

Environment
12
Conservation Farms & Ranches

Preserving and enhancing the habitat of wildlife, such as sandhill cranes, waterfowl, raptors, which habitat expenses are supported by agricultural activities.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeast Wilderness Trust Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Slow Money Nc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OLD-GROWTH FOREST NETWORK INC: $15,500 · EnvironmentOLD-GROWTH FOREST NETWORK INCFALLBROOK LAND CONSERVANCY: $11,500 · EnvironmentFALLBROOK LAND CONSERVANCYSAGINAW BASIN LAND CONSERVANCY: $10,000 · EnvironmentSAGINAW BASIN LAND CONSERVANCYWild Farm Alliance: $6,377 · EnvironmentWild Farm AllianceNORTHEAST WILDERNESS TRUST CORPORATION: $3,000 · EnvironmentNORTHEAST WILDERNESS TRUST CORPORATION+2 more: $335 · EnvironmentSPLIT ROCK: $11,025 · OtherSPLIT ROCKThe Rewilding Institute: $10,500 · OtherThe Rewilding InstituteHilltop Center for Spiritual Living: $5,000 · OtherHilltop Center for Spiritual LivingFriends of the Richmond Free Librar: $3,000 · OtherFriends of the Richmond Free LibrarHERON DANCE ART STUDIO: $2,150 · OtherHERON DANCE ART STUDIOADKAction: $1,500 · Other+10 more: $4,478 · Other+10 moreCHAMPLAIN AREA TRAILS INC: $14,500 · Recreation & SportsCHAMPLAIN AREA T…LAKESIDE PRESCHOOL INC: $2,200 · EducationKISS THE GROUND: $560 · Food & Nutrition
Environment$46,712Other$37,653Recreation & Sports$14,500Education$2,200Food & Nutrition$560

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOLD-GROWTH FOREST NETWORK INC: $15,500 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetCHAMPLAIN AREA TRAILS INC: $14,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetFALLBROOK LAND CONSERVANCY: $11,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSAGINAW BASIN LAND CONSERVANCY: $10,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetWild Farm Alliance: $6,377 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetNORTHEAST WILDERNESS TRUST CORPORATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLAKESIDE PRESCHOOL INC: $2,200 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKISS THE GROUND: $560 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA CATALINA ISLAND CONSERVANCY: $238 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILDCOAST: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOccidental Arts and Ecology Center: $135 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OLD-GROWTH FOREST NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAMPLAIN AREA TRAILS INC ↗
  • Who funds FALLBROOK LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds SAGINAW BASIN LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Wild Farm Alliance ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST WILDERNESS TRUST CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds LAKESIDE PRESCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds KISS THE GROUND ↗
  • Who funds Slow Money NC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA CATALINA ISLAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds WILDCOAST ↗
  • Who funds Occidental Arts and Ecology Center ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eddy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eddy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Northeast Wilderness Trust Corporation: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Eddy Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Eddy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eddy’s filings →

More from the funding graph