Skip to content
Eddie Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Eddie Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$188k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$241kPhilanthropy$209kYouth Development$138kPublic Benefit$100kArts & Culture$91kCommunity Improvement$62kHuman Services$43kEducation$42kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$12,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$650k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OKLAHOMA CITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION$50,000
UNITED WAY OF METRO OKC$26,333
YMCA OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY$20,000
THE UNCOMMON GROUND SCULPTURE PARK$20,000
OU FOUNDATIONSOONER CLUB$16,500
FIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION$12,500
A CHANCE TO CHANGE FOUNDATION$10,000
CASADY SCHOOL$10,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$10,000
SSM HEALTH ST ANTHONY FOUNDATION$8,750
ST LUKES DAY SCHOOL$3,000
ARCADIA HISTORICAL & PRESERVATION SOCIETY$600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YMCA OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY: $20k → 16%FIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $13k → 16%FIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $13k → 16%FIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $8k → 16%AMERICAN INDIAN CULTURAL CENTER FDN: $8k → 16%AMERICAN INDIAN CULTURAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $8k → 16%AMERICAN INDIAN CULTURAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%AMERICAN INDIAN CULTURAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$883k · 15 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
7

Total granted

$883k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
0%

Still filing today

60%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $54k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE ST ANTHONY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $175k · revenue +136%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $138k · revenue +289%
  • OC
    OKLAHOMA CITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2020–2025 · $62k · revenue +196%

Funded once

  • OKLAHOMA CITY NATIONAL MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +40%
  • CO
    COMMITTEE OF 100 OKC INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • OC
    Oklahoma City All Sports Association In
    one grant, 2018 · $4k · revenue -96%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
2
Pi Beta Phi Foundation of Okc
Philanthropy
3
Diversity Center of Oklahoma Inc
Health
4
Masonic Charity Foundation of Oklahoma
Health
5
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
6
Oklahoma City Public Schools Foundation Inc

We are the leading advocate for okcps. we strengthen our schools through community investment, strategic partnerships, and innovative programs.

Education
7
Okmulgee Area Development Corp

Economic development in okmulgee county

Community Improvement
8
Missing and Murdered Indigenous People Central Oklahoma Chapter
Civil Rights
9
Oklahoma Scholarship Fund Inc
—
10
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
11
Angel Fund Okc Inc
Animals
12
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Arcadia Historical & Preservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
7/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF NICHOLS HILLS: $100,000 · OtherCITY OF NICHOLS HILLSUNITED WAY OF METRO OKC: $89,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF METRO OKCOU FOUNDATIONSOONER CLUB: $62,500 · OtherOU FOUNDATIONSOONER CLUBSSM HEALTH ST ANTHONY FOUNDATION: $55,750 · OtherSSM HEALTH ST ANTHONY FOUNDATIONOKLAHOMA CITY PARKS & RECREATION DEPT: $24,000 · OtherOKLAHOMA CITY PARKS & RECREATION DEPTCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC: $22,500 · OtherCASADY SCHOOL: $17,000 · OtherThe Uncommon Ground Sculpture Park Inc: $20,000 · OtherOKLAHOMA CITY BEAUTIFUL INC: $14,868 · Other+9 more: $37,900 · Other+9 moreTHE ST ANTHONY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $175,000 · HealthTHE ST ANTHONY HOSPI…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC: $137,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLU…+1 more: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentFIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $59,999 · Human ServicesFIRST AME…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY: $20,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN…OKLAHOMA CITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $62,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $400 · Community ImprovementUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc: $40,500 · PhilanthropyOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 · PhilanthropyUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $21,500 · Education
Other$443,518Health$175,000Youth Development$138,500Human Services$79,999Community Improvement$62,400Philanthropy$52,500Education$21,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ST ANTHONY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $175,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC: $137,500 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $62,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $59,999 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc: $40,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC: $22,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $21,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY BEAUTIFUL INC: $14,868 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY NATIONAL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetA CHANCE TO CHANGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOklahoma City All Sports Association In: $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Greater Oklahoma City Parks and Trails Foundation Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARCADIA HISTORICAL & PRESERVATION SOCIETY: $600 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRotary Club 29 Foundation: $400 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Inasmuch FoundationCommunities Foundatio…American Fidelity Fou…Rainbolt Family Found…Kirkpatrick Foundatio…El and Thelma Gaylord…Oklahoma City Communi…Fred Jones Family Fou…Crowe & Dunlevy Found…Oge Energy Corp Found…The Merrick FoundationRecords Johnston Fami…
Inasmuch FoundationOK28.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Inasmuch Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · American Fidelity Foundation · Rainbolt Family Foundation · Kirkpatrick Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Fred Jones Family Foundation · Crowe & Dunlevy Foundation Inc · Oge Energy Corp Foundation Inc · The Merrick Foundation · Records Johnston Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eddie Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eddie Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Oklahoma City National Memorial Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • First Americans Museum Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eddie’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home