Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ed Haggar Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$249k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$727kEducation$434kHuman Services$354kFood & Nutrition$76kPhilanthropy$44kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kReligion$37kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$80,000
URSULINE ACADEMY DALLAS$40,000
BLICK CENTER$35,000
ST MICHAEL'S CATHOLIC HS$15,000
THE SALVALTION ARMY$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS-CA FIRE RELIEF$10,000
ST RITA CATHOLIC SCHOOL$5,000
CATHOLIC FOUNDATION$5,000
CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL$5,000
PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK$5,000
NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK$5,000
KIDNEY TEXAS INC$5,000
HE BUTT FOUNDATION-KERR COUNTY FLOODS$5,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS$5,000
RISE SCHOOL OF DALLAS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DENVER: $10k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DENVER: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IA
IN
OH
CA
CO
NM
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 24 repeat orgs$189k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
20

Total granted

$1.6M
$169k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
-6%

Still filing today

46%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $60k · revenue +429%
  • PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +24%
  • KI
    KIDNEYTEXAS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • CF
    CRISTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • RC
    RED CROSS
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • US
    UNICEF - SYRIA & TURKEY RELIEF
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas Citizens Council

To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.

—
2
Dallas College Foundation Inc

Dallas college foundation enhances the level of achievement and excellence of dallas college by providing scholarships, eliminating barriers that prevent students from attending and graduating, and supporting innovation.

Education
3
Episcopal Foundation of Dallas

The foundation's mission is to strengthen and support faith communities by partnering wise investments with purposeful giving.

Religion
4
Dallas County Medical Society

The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.

—
5
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—
6
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
7
Cook Children's Health Plan

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
8
Dallas Bar Association

The Dallas Bar Association is a nonprofit corporation chartered by the State of Texas to protect and advance the professional interests of persons licensed to practice law in the Dallas area, to improve the relations between the Bench, the…

—
9
Dallas Regional Chamber

Together, with our business leaders and community partners, we will help lead the dallas region to become the best place in the united states for all people to live, work, and do business.

—
10
North Texas Christian Foundation

National Christian Foundation North Texas (NCFNT) was created to facilitate smarter Christian giving with sophisticated charitable techniques.

Philanthropy
11
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
12
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud

At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of Dallas Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Barbara Bush Foundation for Family Literacy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $485,000 · OtherCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATIONBLICK CENTER: $180,000 · OtherBLICK CENTERURSULINE ACADEMY DALLAS: $165,000 · OtherURSULINE ACADEMY DALLASST MICHAEL'S CATHOLIC HS: $150,000 · OtherST MICHAEL'S CATHOLIC HSTHE SALVALTION ARMY: $66,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC: $60,000 · OtherST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $59,500 · Other+30 more: $367,045 · Other+30 morePANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $50,000 · HealthKIDNEYTEXAS INC: $45,000 · HealthPARKLAND FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthNOTRE DAME OF DALLAS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 · EducationSaint Martin de Porres High School: $17,500 · EducationRISE SCHOOL OF DALLAS: $10,000 · EducationTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL: $20,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $19,000 · Food & NutritionCATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER: $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION FOR FAMILY LITERACY INC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,532,545Health$105,000Education$45,500Philanthropy$20,000Food & Nutrition$19,000Human Services$15,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC: $60,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $50,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKIDNEYTEXAS INC: $45,000 over 9y, 9.2% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $42,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $19,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNOTRE DAME OF DALLAS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetSaint Martin de Porres High School: $17,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC: $13,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPARKLAND FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION FOR FAMILY LITERACY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDNEYTEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds NOTRE DAME OF DALLAS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Saint Martin de Porres High School ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds PARKLAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RISE SCHOOL OF DALLAS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA9.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ed Haggar Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ed Haggar Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ed Haggar Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph