Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ed and Jean Mathews Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$493k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$1.1MReligion$135kAnimals$80kHuman Services$75kRecreation & Sports$50kYouth Development$40kPhilanthropy$40kHealth$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $346k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
$20,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$8.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITY$60,428
Individual grant recipient$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA$40,773
WESTBURY$40,000
NEWMAN UNIVERSITY$30,806
CANINE COMPANIONS$30,000
Individual grant recipient$27,218
MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY$24,740
FRIENDS UNIVERSITY$22,062
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY$20,057
HOSPITALITY HOUSE$20,000
BAXTER FOUNDATION$20,000
BREWSTER ROAD COMMUNITY CHURCH$20,000
ST MATTHEW'S SCHOOL$15,150
MISSION K9$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $151k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOSPITALITY HOUSE: $21k → 8%HOSPITALITY HOUSE: $20k → 8%CANINE COMPANIONS: $30k → 16%CANINE COMPANIONS: $30k → 16%CANINE COMPANIONS: $20k → 16%CANINE COMPANIONS: $20k → 16%CANINE COMPANIONS: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
RI
CA
VA
KS
AR
NC
OK
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 35 repeat orgs$285k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
12

Total granted

$2.2M
$216k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+46%

Still filing today

31%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $69k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FU
    Friends University
    7× · 2019–2025 · $210k · revenue +29%
  • TS
    THE SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE
    5× · 2019–2023 · $183k · revenue +8%
  • TU
    The University of Tampa Incorporated
    2× · 2024–2025 · $60k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • O
    OCU
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • P
    PEPPERDINE
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • BF
    BARTER FOUNDATIONS
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Excelsior University

Excelsior University provides educational opportunity to adult learners with an emphasis on those historically underrepresented in higher education. The University meets students where they are - academically and geographically, offering…

Education
2
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
3
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
4
George Fox University

George fox university, a christ centered community, prepares students spiritually, academically, and professionally to think with clarity, act with integrity, and serve with passion.

Education
5
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
6
Houghton University

Houghton university provides an academically challenging, christ-centered education in the liberal arts and sciences to students from diverse traditions and economic backgrounds and equips them to lead and labor as scholar-servants in a…

Education
7
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
8
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
9
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
10
Hope International University

The mission of hope international university is to empower students through christian higher education to serve the church and impact the world for christ. the university specializes in fields offering significant influence on society…

Education
11
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
12
Spring Arbor University

Spring arbor university is a community of learners distinguished by our lifelong involvement in the study and application of the liberal arts, total commitment to jesus christ as the perspective for learning and critical participation in…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma Baptist University; the most unlike its peers is Baxter International Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $295,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWESTBURY: $225,000 · OtherWESTBURYMISSION K9: $110,000 · OtherMISSION K9CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK: $100,000 · OtherCITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORKOCU: $100,000 · OtherOCUHarding University Inc: $100,000 · OtherHarding University IncHOSPITALITY HOUSE: $82,500 · OtherOKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $69,160 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $62,840 · OtherBREWSTER ROAD COMMUNITY CHURCH: $60,000 · Other+33 more: $498,886 · Other+33 moreFriends University: $210,007 · EducationFriends UniversityTHE SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE: $182,620 · EducationTHE SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGEJOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITY: $119,564 · EducationJOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITYThe University of Tampa Incorporated: $60,494 · EducationThe University of Tampa Inco…OKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $47,170 · EducationOKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY+1 more: $10,000 · EducationCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $110,000 · Human ServicesHOSPITALITY HOUSE: $41,000 · Human ServicesSpringSpirit Inc: $40,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,703,386Education$629,855Human Services$151,000Recreation & Sports$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFriends University: $210,007 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE: $182,620 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetJOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITY: $119,564 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $110,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHarding University Inc: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe University of Tampa Incorporated: $60,494 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $47,170 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPITALITY HOUSE: $41,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSpringSpirit Inc: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBAXTER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVOA MILLEN HOME INC: $15,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetMid-America Christian University Inc: $10,429 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOklahoma Christian University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Friends University ↗
  • Who funds THE SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds JOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Harding University Inc ↗
  • Who funds The University of Tampa Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HOSPITALITY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds SpringSpirit Inc ↗
  • Who funds BAXTER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VOA MILLEN HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Mid-America Christian University Inc ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma Christian University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK16.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · Folds of Honor Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ed and Jean Mathews Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ed and Jean Mathews Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The University of Tampa Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ed and Jean Mathews Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ed and Jean Mathews Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ed and Jean Mathews’ filings →

More from the funding graph