Loading…
· Private foundation
ECHEVARRIA FAMILY FOUNDATION INC
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$40k
Granted FY2020
3
Grants
1
Communities
$17k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2020.
Community Improvement$432kAnimals$115kHuman Services$8kPhilanthropy$6kEducation$5kEnvironment$5kHealth$600Youth Development$500Other$54k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
—
2019
tampa bay
2020
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2020 · 3 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $32k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$296k
Total assets
Largest grants
- REEF RENEWAL LLC$17,000
- CONNECT AND PROPEL TAMPA BAY LLC$15,000
- URBAN LEAGUE OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY$7,500
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$481k · 3 repeat orgs$144k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +273% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2020, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
3
11
Total granted
$481k
$136k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+273%
+42%
Still filing today
67%
64%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
AnimalsEducationCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACONNECT AND PROPEL TAMPA BAY LLC2× · 2019–2020 · $432k · revenue -100% · 86% of their budget
- RRREEF RENEWAL LLC3× · 2018–2020 · $44k
- CFCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY2× · 2017–2019 · $6k · revenue +273%
Funded once
- TFTHE FLORIDA AQUARIUMgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $110k · revenue +97%
- CRCORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +312%
- SYSALESIAN YOUTH CENTERone grant, 2018 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
The University of Tampa Incorporated
The University of Tampa is committed to the development of each student to become a productive and responsible citizen.
Education
2
Tampa Bay Watch Inc
Tampa bay watch is dedicated to fostering a healthy tampa bay watershed through community-driven restorating projects, education programs, and outreach initiatives.
Environment
3
The Tampa Bay History Center
Discovering, preserving, and learning from our region's past to inform our common future.
Environment
4
Tampabay-Job-Links Inc
—
5
University of South Florida Foundation Inc
To accept, invest and distribute private gifts in support of the university of south florida.
Education
6
Clearwater Marine Aquarium Inc
Rescue, rehab, release of marine life, environmental education, inspiration, research & conservation.
Animals
7
University of South Florida Alumni Association Inc
The mission of the USF Alumni Association is to foster a mutually beneficial, lifelong relationship between the University and its alumni; to inspire loyalty and pride among current and future alumni; and to advocate for excellence in…
Education
8
Tampa General Hospital
To support and promote the program services of florida health sciences center, inc. dba tampa general hospital.
Health
9
Tampa Bay Times Fund Inc
—
10
Florida Animal Protection Foundation
Animals
11
Community Foundation for Palm Beach and
To enhance the quality of life for all residents now and for future generations; to build permanent endowments, to provide community leadership on relevant issues, and to address needs through grantmaking. as part of our strategic plan,…
Philanthropy
12
Pinellas Ex-Offender Re-entry Coalition
Provision of outreach services to ex-offenders.
Crime & Legal
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hillsborough Education Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Champlain College Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Community Improvement$431,612Animals$115,000Other$54,750Human Services$7,500Philanthropy$6,000Education$5,100Environment$5,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CONNECT AND PROPEL TAMPA BAY LLC ↗
- Who funds THE FLORIDA AQUARIUM ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY ↗
- Who funds CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF TAMPA BAY ↗
- Who funds CHAMPLAIN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds HILLSBOROUGH EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CLUB YANA ↗
- Who funds MEN OF VISION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Community Foundation of Tampa Bay IncFL17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Debartolo Family Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation ECHEVARRIA FAMILY FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- The Coral Restoration Foundation Inc — 16% of income from government
- The Florida Aquarium Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CONNECT AND PROPEL TAMPA BAY LLC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 842197689 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on CONNECT AND PROPEL TAMPA BAY LLC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 86% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Echevarria Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Echevarria Family Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines