Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ebrahimi Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$963k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$335k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

83% of Ebrahimi Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 10 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Ebrahimi Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $963k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’17
2
’18
1
’19
5
’20
4
’21
7
’22
7
’23
9
’24
10
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.1MEducation$673kArts & Culture$613kPublic Benefit$250kFood & Nutrition$139kCommunity Improvement$100kEnvironment$80kCivil Rights$55kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $278k
  • $250k+2 grants · $585k
$59,350
Median grant
6
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS$335,000
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$250,000
CATHOLIC EXTENSION SOCIETY$118,558
BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL$100,000
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION$59,350
CE 12 FOUNDATION$30,000
FRIENDS OF CARITAS CUBA$25,000
DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS$20,000
CUBA STUDY GROUP$20,000
HOLLINS UNIVERSITY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 70% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FRIENDS OF CARITAS CUBA: $33k → 8%BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $100k → 16%UCI FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%UCLA FOUNDATION: $150k → 14%TEXAS FREEDOM NETWORK EDUCATION FUND: $250k → 10%CUBA STUDY GROUP: $23k → 14%CE 12 FOUNDATION: $30k → 9%PROJECT CURE: $10k → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS: $335k → 12%CHICAGO JAZZ PHILHARMONIC: $3k → 14%CAALE: $1k → 14%HOLLINS UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%FRIENDS OF CARITAS CUBA: $25k → 8%BRIGHAM & WOMENS HOSPITAL: $300k → 16%UCLA FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%CUBA STUDY GROUP: $20k → 14%CE 12 FOUNDATION: $20k → 9%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS: $25k → 12%HOLLINS UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%FRIENDS OF CARITAS CUBA: $9k → 8%Dana Farber Cancer: $75k → 16%UCLA FOUNDATION: $80k → 14%Cuba Emprende Foundation: $10k → 14%CE 12 FOUNDATION: $20k → 9%Planned Parenthood: $20k → 12%CATHOLIC EXTENSION SOCIETY: $119k → 14%FRIENDS OF CARITAS CUBA: $5k → 8%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $250k → 16%UCLA FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%CUBA STUDY GROUP: $10k → 14%CE 12 FOUNDATION: $20k → 9%Planned Parenthood: $20k → 12%CATHOLIC EXTENSION: $20k → 14%FRIENDS OF CARITAS CUBA: $2k → 8%CE12 FOUNDATION: $15k → 9%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS: $20k → 12%CATHOLIC EXTENSION SOCIETY: $16k → 14%FRIENDS OF CARITAS: $1k → 8%CE12 FOUNDATION: $15k → 9%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS: $20k → 12%Belmont Day School: $138k → 8%DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS: $20k → 12%Belmont Day School: $133k → 8%DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS: $20k → 12%DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS: $20k → 12%Denver Botanic Gardens: $20k → 12%DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS: $10k → 12%DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MA
IA
CT
CA
CO
VA
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 14 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
9

Total granted

$2.0M
$789k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+61%

Still filing today

71%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthCivil RightsEnvironmentArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $440k · revenue +38%
  • BD
    BELMONT DAY SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $271k · revenue +64%
  • SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $264k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF FREER SACKLER - FELLOWSHIPS
    one grant, 2022 · $250k
  • TF
    TEXAS FREEDOM NETWORK EDUCATION FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue -2%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF FREER SACKLER - NMAA ACQUISITION FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
4
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International
5
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
8
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
9
Charles R Drew University of Medicine and Science

Charles r. drew university of medicine and science is a private non-profit student-centered university that is committed to cultivating diverse health professional leaders who are dedicated to social justice and health equity for…

Education
10
Trustees of Clark University

Clark university's mission is to educate undergraduate and graduate students to be imaginative and contributing citizens of the world, and to advance the frontiers of knowledge and understanding through rigorous scholarship and creative…

Education
11
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
12
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of California Irvine Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $1,340,200 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIF…CE12 FOUNDATION: $120,000 · Community ImprovementCE12 FOUNDATIONMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $400,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORAT…FRIENDS OF FREER SACKLER - FELLOWSHIPS: $250,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF FREER SACKLER - FELL…MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $250,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITALCATHOLIC CHURCH EXTENSION SOCIETY OF US OF AMER: $154,558 · OtherCATHOLIC CHURCH EXTENSION SOCIE…FRIENDS OF FREER SACKLER - NMAA ACQUISITION FUND: $100,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF FREER SACKLER - NMAA…Smithsonian Institution - Friends of Freer Sackler: $60,000 · Other+6 more: $96,246 · Other+6 moreUCLA FOUNDATION: $335,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONBELMONT DAY SCHOOL INC: $271,064 · EducationBELMONT DAY SCHO…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CA…+2 more: $32,000 · EducationROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $440,000 · HealthROCKY MOUNTA…Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $75,000 · HealthDana-Farber …+1 more: $10,000 · HealthTEXAS FREEDOM NETWORK EDUCATION FUND: $250,000 · Civil RightsCUBA STUDY GROUP INC: $53,000 · Civil RightsSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $263,750 · Arts & CultureDENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC: $100,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF CARITAS CUBANA CORP: $74,000 · International
Community Improvement$1,460,200Other$1,310,804Education$688,064Health$525,000Civil Rights$303,000Arts & Culture$263,750Environment$100,000International$74,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $1,340,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $440,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $335,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBELMONT DAY SCHOOL INC: $271,064 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $263,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS FREEDOM NETWORK EDUCATION FUND: $250,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetCE12 FOUNDATION: $120,000 over 6y, 6.5% of budgetDENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC: $100,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF CARITAS CUBANA CORP: $74,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetCUBA STUDY GROUP INC: $53,000 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $21,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Jazz Philharmonic: $3,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BELMONT DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS FREEDOM NETWORK EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds CE12 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CARITAS CUBANA CORP ↗
  • Who funds CUBA STUDY GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds HOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds BENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Jazz Philharmonic ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ebrahimi Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ebrahimi Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ebrahimi Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph