Skip to content

· Private foundation

Eastwood Corner Non-Grantor Irrv Tr

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$14k
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$97kFood & Nutrition$5kHealth$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kHuman Services$3kInternational$1kHousing & Shelter$1kYouth Development$825Other$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$300
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEADOW VALLEY MENNONITE CHURCH$6,000
PRISON EVANGELISM$1,000
LIBERTY RIDGE FARM$1,000
CAM CUMBERLAND CLOTHING CENTER$690
WEAVERLAND DISASTER SERVICE$600
HELPING HAND & HEARTS$500
SUNSHINE TRAIL RETREAT$500
CLINIC FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN$400
STILL WATER MINISTRIES$350
HOSPICE & COMMUNITY CARE$350
MISSION INT COMMITTEE$300
FURNACE HILLS RETREAT INC$300
CONESTOGA RETREAT$200
PEACEFUL MEADOWS RECOVERY CENTER$200
Individual grant recipient$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOYS TOWN: $24 → 12%PEACEFUL MEADOWS RECOVERY CENTER: $200 → 10%PEACEFUL MEDOWS RECOVERY CENTER: $100 → 10%SUNLIGHT GARDENS: $100 → 11%SUNLIGHT GARDENS: $51 → 11%SUNLIGHT GARDENS: $30 → 11%WATER STREET MISSION: $231 → 9%VISION CORPS: $150 → 9%VISION CORPS: $150 → 9%VISION CORPS: $150 → 9%WATER STREET MISSION: $100 → 9%WATER STREET MISSION: $30 → 9%VISION CORPS: $20 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NE
AZ
NC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$114k · 36 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +71% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
21

Total granted

$114k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+27%

Still filing today

31%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionHealthYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    Christian Aid Ministries
    4× · 2017–2023 · $7k · revenue +9%
  • PE
    PRISON EVANGELISM INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $6k · revenue +336%
  • CH
    CHOICES HEALTHCARE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • SM
    SPRINGVILLE MENNONITE CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • CC
    CUMBERLAND CLOTHING CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • MM
    MENNONITE MESSIANIC MISSIONS
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sunrise Meadows

The purpose of the Organization is to provide a sanctuary, guidance, and support for those individuals dealing with bipolar, schizophrenic, or similar disorders. To extend a Christian home-like extended care facility for affected people of…

Human Services
2
Pine Rest Christian Mental Health Services

Pine Rest Christian Mental Health Services is called to express the healing ministry of Jesus Christ by providing behavioral health services with professional excellence, Christian integrity, and compassion.

Health
3
Lighthouse Christian Home and Services Inc

For god's love to be expressed for and by individuals with developmental disabilities through faith based programs and services.

Human Services
4
River Bend Recovery

A faith-based, sober living house, for men who are serious about maintaining a life of sobriety from addictive substances.

Health
5
Reformed Church Ministries to the Aging the Particular Synod of Mid-Atlantics

The mission of the reformed church ministries to the aging, the regional synod of the mid-atlantics ("rch"), is "committed to the compassionate care of our elders in a spiritual environment". our commission and priority is to serve the…

Human Services
6
Revive Inc

Empowering individuals on their journey to lasting recovery. our team of dedicated professionals offer a dynamic blend of therapeutic support and personal empowerment. we dont just offer recovery; we provide a roadmap to your vibrant…

Health
7
Pennsylvania Organization for Women in Early Recovery

See schedule o.power's mission is to help women reclaim their lives from addiction and related emotional health issues and improve the well-being of future generations. we provide a range of gender-responsive, trauma-informed drug and…

Health
8
Sunny Crest Home Inc

In a Christian-living, home-like atmosphere, we endeavor to provide ample opportunity for personal growth while focusing on bringing out the best in each individual, giving their light a chance to shine.

Human Services
9
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
10
Craig and Frances Lindner Center of Hope

Lindner center of hope (lcoh) is a mental health center staffed by a diverse team, united in the philosophy that by working together, we can best offer hope for people living with mental illness. the patients and their families are at the…

Health
11
Montgomery County Emergency Service Inc

Mces provides round-the-clock intensive and comprehensive behavioral health services, including an adult inpatient hospital, to all in need in the community. mission: mces provides an array of clinically necessary emergency psychiatric and…

Health
12
Stories Made New

A residential home of discipleship ministry and personal development for young women ages 18-40.To bring single women who are struggling into fulfillment and purpose in Jesus Christ.To help them deal with and work through life dominating…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Water Street Ministries; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
16/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEADOW VALLEY MENNONITE CHURCH: $73,166 · OtherMEADOW VALLEY MENNONITE CHURCHLIBERTY RIDGE FARM: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,500 · OtherSPRINGVILLE MENNONITE CHURCH: $4,000 · OtherWEAVERLAND DISASTER SERVICE: $3,600 · Other+41 more: $16,801 · Other+41 moreChristian Aid Ministries: $6,699 · ReligionChristian A…PRISON EVANGELISM INC: $6,000 · ReligionPRISON EVAN…+1 more: $266 · ReligionCHOICES HEALTHCARE: $1,900 · Human ServicesVISIONCORPS: $470 · Human ServicesWATER STREET MINISTRIES: $361 · Human ServicesPEACEFUL MEADOWS RECOVERY CENTER: $300 · Human ServicesSUNLIGHT GARDENS: $181 · Human Services+1 more: $24 · Human ServicesRED ROCK REFUGE INC: $325 · Youth DevelopmentPHILHAVEN: $150 · HealthCOUNTRYSIDE REST: $100 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $50 · HealthLIGHTHOUSE VOCATIONAL SERVICES: $200 · EmploymentGREEN PASTURE REST HOME: $148 · Housing & Shelter
Other$107,067Religion$12,965Human Services$3,236Youth Development$325Health$300Employment$200Housing & Shelter$148

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChristian Aid Ministries: $6,699 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPRISON EVANGELISM INC: $6,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetCHOICES HEALTHCARE: $1,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLINIC FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN INC: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVISIONCORPS: $470 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWATER STREET MINISTRIES: $361 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRED ROCK REFUGE INC: $325 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPEACEFUL MEADOWS RECOVERY CENTER: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGRACE PRESS INC: $266 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE VOCATIONAL SERVICES: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNLIGHT GARDENS: $181 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPHILHAVEN: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN PASTURE REST HOME: $148 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNTRYSIDE REST: $100 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $24 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Christian Aid Ministries ↗
  • Who funds PRISON EVANGELISM INC ↗
  • Who funds CHOICES HEALTHCARE ↗
  • Who funds THE CLINIC FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds VISIONCORPS ↗
  • Who funds WATER STREET MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds RED ROCK REFUGE INC ↗
  • Who funds PEACEFUL MEADOWS RECOVERY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GRACE PRESS INC ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE VOCATIONAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds SUNLIGHT GARDENS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Anabaptist FoundationPA37.7× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Anabaptist Foundation · Tears of Hope Foundation · Sunrise Meadows · Christian Aid Ministries Foundation · Lancaster County Community Foundation · The Norman & Elizabeth Hahn Family Foundation · Burkholder Family Foundation · Shady Maple Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eastwood Corner Non-Grantor Irrv Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eastwood Corner Non-Grantor Irrv Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Eastwood Corner Non-Grantor Irrv Tr?

    Find your warmest path to Eastwood Corner Non-Grantor Irrv Tr through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Eastwood Corner Non-Grantor Irrv Tr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph