Loading…
· Private foundation
EASTWOOD CORNER NON-GRANTOR IRRV TR
This foundation accepts unsolicited grant applications.
$14k
Granted FY2024
24
Grants
5
Communities
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 92% of EASTWOOD CORNER NON-GRANTOR IRRV TR’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
firevisionrestredlincolnchildrenhaiti
2021
vision
2022
—
2023
ministries
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 24 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$300
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
- MEADOW VALLEY MENNONITE CHURCH$6,000
- LIBERTY RIDGE FARM$1,000
- PRISON EVANGELISM$1,000
- CAM CUMBERLAND CLOTHING CENTER$690
- WEAVERLAND DISASTER SERVICE$600
- SUNSHINE TRAIL RETREAT$500
- HELPING HAND & HEARTS$500
- CLINIC FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN$400
- HOSPICE & COMMUNITY CARE$350
- STILL WATER MINISTRIES$350
- MISSION INT COMMITTEE$300
- FURNACE HILLS RETREAT INC$300
- WELLSPAN PHILLHAVEN$200
- CONESTOGA RETREAT$200
- LIGHTHOUSE VOCATIONAL SERVICES$200
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $381) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$114k · 35 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +71% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
35 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
35
22
Total granted
$114k
$8k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+71%
0%
Still filing today
20%
9%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesReligionYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterArts & CultureEmploymentOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PEPRISON EVANGELISM5× · 2020–2024 · $6k · revenue +215%
- HCHOSPICE & COMMUNITY CARE5× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +71%
- CFCLINIC FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN3× · 2020–2024 · $1k · revenue +188%
Funded once
- SMSPRINGVILLE MENNONITE CHURCHone grant, 2023 · $4k
- CCCUMBERLAND CLOTHING CENTERone grant, 2022 · $1k
- MMMENNONITE MESSIANIC MISSIONone grant, 2017 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Sunrise Meadows
Our vision is to provide a conservative Christian home setting for individuals dealing with bipolar, schizophrenic or similar disorders who are of the Amish or Mennonite faith. We will work with residents needs and skills, thus encourage…
Human Services
2
Kings Stewards Inc
RETIREMENT HOME committed to fostering an active and inviting Christian atmosphere for our residents while providing for all of their needs.
Housing & Shelter
3
Carriage House Repose & Restore
Provide a place of rest, respite, repose and restoration in a peaceful, quiet and beautiful garden setting for ministers, missionaries and other individuals called to preach, teach and present the Gospel of Christ Jesus to mankind.
Religion
4
Haven of Rest
For women that are emotionally disturbed distressed, having spiritual and marital problems, moral obsessions, and mental illnesses. Providing counseling in a Christian setting, as an alternative to other institutions, being an extension of…
Religion
5
Hannahs Home
Hannahs Home is a Christ-centered life-affirming maternity home for women who are in crisis.
Human Services
6
Christian Counseling & Educational
CCEF exists to Restore Christ to counseling and counseling to the church by thinking biblically about the issues of living. CCEF does this through teaching, speaking, counseling, and writing.
Human Services
7
Restoring Purpose Ministries
Restoring Purpose Ministries is committed to seeing the hurting, especially those battling in addiction or in recovery, restored to a place of purpose. RPM offers assistance to find the right rehab or program to assist in sobriety; RPM has…
Religion
8
Weaverland Mennonite Homes
To provide Independent Living and / or Personal Care Homes for the conservative older generation with limited funds and a need for assistance with basic functions of living, as well as provide a facility or home for mentally and physically…
Housing & Shelter
9
West Georgia Christian Retreat Ctr
Provide a place of communion and growth in personal relationship with jesus christ.
Religion
10
Hopewell Ministries
To provide Christian counseling.
Human Services
11
Sunny View Lutheran Home
Provide services to residents with limited means, residing in a 100-unit senior living facility.
Human Services
12
Christian Care Management Inc
Management, accounting, human resources, development and i.t. for christian care companies.
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Red Rock Refuge Inc and the most unlike its peers is Grace Press Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$114,871Religion$6,266Human Services$2,281Youth Development$325Employment$200Housing & Shelter$148Health$100Arts & Culture$50
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Anabaptist FoundationPA26.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Anabaptist Foundation · Christian Aid Ministries Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation EASTWOOD CORNER NON-GRANTOR IRRV TR funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PRISON EVANGELISM.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~2 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.1× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 465656538 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on PRISON EVANGELISM, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 2 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 3% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Eastwood Corner Non-Grantor Irrv Tr?
Find your warmest path to Eastwood Corner Non-Grantor Irrv Tr through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines