Skip to content

· Public charity

Eastern Maine Development Corporation

Provide educational and other economic development services to governments and businesses in eastern Maine

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
66
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$99k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$2.5MArts & Culture$276kFood & Nutrition$219kHuman Services$188kHealth$108kRecreation & Sports$100kEnvironment$96kHousing & Shelter$70kOther$0
02FY2024 · 66 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $93k
  • $10k–50k50 grants · $1.0M
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $308k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Upstart Maine Inc$98,750
Maine Multicultural Center$98,750
Four Directions Development Corp$60,000
NMDC$50,000
Cardtastic Collectibles and More$25,000
Highlands Lodging$25,000
Moosehead Lakeshore Journal$25,000
Wallace Interiors$25,000
Horn Run Brewing$25,000
The Phoenix on Water Street$25,000
Inked Beauty By Sen$25,000
The Village Kitchen$25,000
Moosabec Medical$25,000
Acadia Charter Company LLC$25,000
The Beauty Artist$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $107k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Mainehighlands Senior Center: $9k → 15%Maine Multicultural Center: $99k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$833k · 3 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +186% since the first grant, against +107% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 62 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
4

Total granted

$833k
$656k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+186%
+107%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SUNRISE COUNTY ECONOMIC COUNCIL
    5× · 2018–2022 · $489k · revenue +353%
  • FD
    Four Directions Development Corporation
    3× · 2021–2024 · $196k · revenue +186%
  • UM
    UPSTART MAINE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $149k · revenue -9% · 42% of their budget

Funded once

  • CC
    Community Concepts Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $558k · revenue -47%
  • AW
    Acadia Wilderness Lodge
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • PB
    Penobscot Bay Weddings & Events
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Eastern Maine Development Corporation

Provide educational and other economic development services to governments and businesses in eastern Maine

Community Improvement
2
New Brunswick Development Corporation
Human Services
3
Pittsfield Development Corporation

To assist new businesses to move to Pittsfield, to support expanding existing businesses, and to promote economic development and jobs for the betterment of Pittsfield, Maine.

—
4
Maine Center for Enterprise Development Dba Maine Center for Entrepreneurs

To create high quality jobs for maine through best practice incubations services that systematically assist new businesses with intellectual property and business plan needs, r&d activities, early stage financing and product…

Unclassified
5
Vinalhaven Community Development Partnership

Supporting Local Businesses and Economic Diversification and Development on Vinalhaven

Community Improvement
6
Androscoggin Valley Council of Governments

To strengten local government while combining total resources to meet regional challenges beyond individual capacities and to serve as a mutual forum to identify, study, and to bring into focus regional interest.

Public Benefit
7
Maine Development Foundation

The mission of the Maine Development Foundation is to foster sustainable, long-term economic growth for Maine. Its programs stimulate new ideas, help develop Maine's leaders, and provide common ground for solving problems and advancing…

Community Improvement
8
Maine & Company

Maine & Company is a private, non-profit business development sales organization. Its purpose is to improve Maine's success in attracting new business and expanding and retaining existing business by providing a focused, statewide sales…

—
9
Central Maine Growth Council

The Growth Council was established to foster a robust regional economy in a collaborative manner in a mult-town community.

Community Improvement
10
Skowhegan Economic Development Corp

To foster, encourage and assist in the location, settlement or resettlement of industry and recreational, agricultural,and other business enterprises in the Town of Skowhegan and in the County of Somerset.

Community Improvement
11
Piscataquis County Economic Development Council

Promoting economic development and generating jobs in Piscataquis County, Maine

Community Improvement
12
Addison County Economic Development Corporation

To create an entrepreneurial and innovative environment, nurturing business to launch, grow, and thrive.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Moosehead Lake Region Economic Development Corp; the most unlike its peers is Association of Procurement Technical Assistance Centers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Community Concepts Inc: $558,368 · OtherCommunity Concepts Inc+61 more: $1,198,993 · Other+61 moreNorthern Maine Development Commission: $1,057,835 · Community ImprovementNorthern Maine Development CommissionSUNRISE COUNTY ECONOMIC COUNCIL: $488,537 · Community ImprovementSUNRISE COUNTY ECONOMIC COUNCILUPSTART MAINE INC: $148,750 · Community ImprovementUPSTART MAINE INC+2 more: $15,000 · Community ImprovementFour Directions Development Corporation: $196,126 · Housing & ShelterMAINE MULTICULTURAL CENTER: $98,750 · Human ServicesMAINE HIGHLANDS SENIOR CENTER: $8,657 · Human Services
Other$1,757,361Community Improvement$1,710,122Housing & Shelter$196,126Human Services$107,407

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNorthern Maine Development Commission: $1,057,835 over 7y, 6.7% of budgetCommunity Concepts Inc: $558,368 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSUNRISE COUNTY ECONOMIC COUNCIL: $488,537 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetFour Directions Development Corporation: $196,126 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetUPSTART MAINE INC: $148,750 over 2y, 42% of budgetMAINE MULTICULTURAL CENTER: $98,750 over 1y, 58% of budgetPISCATAQUIS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $20,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetMOOSEHEAD LAKE REGION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP: $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetMAINE HIGHLANDS SENIOR CENTER: $8,657 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetASSOCIATION OF PROCUREMENT TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CENTERS INC: $7,529 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCOOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Northern Maine Development Commission ↗
  • Who funds Community Concepts Inc ↗
  • Who funds SUNRISE COUNTY ECONOMIC COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds Four Directions Development Corporation ↗
  • Who funds UPSTART MAINE INC ↗
  • Who funds MAINE MULTICULTURAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PISCATAQUIS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maine Technology InstituteME26.9× affinity12 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maine Technology Institute · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · Maine Initiativesinc · Maine International Trade Center · John T Gorman Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eastern Maine Development Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eastern Maine Development Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 58%
  • Cooperative Development Institute Inc: 58% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eastern Maine Development’s filings →

More from the funding graph