Skip to content

· Private foundation

Earl W & Hazel C Pierson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$143k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$420kHuman Services$216kReligion$99kEducation$67kHousing & Shelter$35kFood & Nutrition$13kRecreation & Sports$6kYouth Development$5k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $125k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SIRE$15,000
B2B MINISTRY$15,000
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH SCHOOL$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
ARC OF BELL COUNTY ARC OF BELL COUNTY$10,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF GALVESTON$10,000
STILL CREEK RANCH$10,000
REACH UNLIMITED INC$10,000
VITALIVING$10,000
HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY$10,000
EIGHT DAYS OF HOPE$10,000
GRACE LAKE MINISTRIES$7,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ELIZABETH LUTHERAN CHURCH-COMMUNITY KITCHEN$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $178k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GRACE LAKE MINISTRIES: $8k → 5%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY: $10k → 14%GRACE LAKE MINISTRIES: $8k → 5%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY: $10k → 14%GRACE LAKE MINISTRIES: $5k → 5%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY: $5k → 14%GRACE LAKE MINISTRIES: $5k → 5%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY: $5k → 14%GRACE LAKE MINISTRIES: $5k → 5%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY: $5k → 14%GRACE LAKE MINISTRIES: $5k → 5%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY: $5k → 14%GRACE LAKE MINISTRIES: $5k → 5%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY: $5k → 14%GRACE LAKE MINISTRIES: $3k → 5%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY: $5k → 14%GRACE LAKE MINISTRIES: $2k → 5%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY: $5k → 14%HOUSE OF AMOS: $3k → 16%REACH UNLIMITED INC: $10k → 16%REACH UNLIMITED INC: $10k → 16%REACH UNLIMITED INC: $10k → 16%REACH UNLIMITED INC: $10k → 16%REACH UNLIMITED INC: $10k → 16%REACH UNLIMITED INC: $10k → 16%REACH UNLIMITED INC: $5k → 16%REACH UNLIMITED INC: $5k → 16%REACH UNLIMITED INC: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Earl W & Hazel C Pierson Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Earl W & Hazel C Pierson Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$798k · 21 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
11

Total granted

$798k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+22%

Still filing today

48%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RU
    REACH UNLIMITED INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +9%
  • GI
    GRACEWOOD INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +55%
  • SI
    SIRE INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • UO
    URBAN OUTREACH INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +16%
  • SH
    SEARCH - HOUSE OF TINY TREASURERS
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Hospice at the Texas Medical Center

The Hospice at the Texas Medical Center holds a freestanding 37 bed inpatient facility in the Texas Medical Center that is operated and managed by Houston Hospice.

Human Services
2
Ronald McDonald House of Dallas Inc

Our mission is to provide essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare. We support the health and well-being of seriously ill or injured children receiving treatment in the…

—
3
Houston Habitat for Humanity Inc

Seeking to put God's love into action, Houston Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to provide a world where everyone has a decent place to live.

Housing & Shelter
4
LifeHouse of Houston Inc

LifeHouse is a Christ-centered ministry ensuring life for unborn children by providing opportunities for housing, help, and hope for young women during their pregnancies and beyond.

—
5
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Houston/Galveston Inc

The mission of Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Houston/ Galveston, Inc. (RMHCGHG) is to create, find and support programs that directly benefit children primarily in the areas of health and education.

—
6
Texas Low-Income Housing Information Service

Our mission is to support low-income Texans efforts to achieve the American dream of a decent, affordable home in a quality neighborhood. We believe that Texas critical low-income housing and community development needs can best be solved…

Housing & Shelter
7
Summerhouse Houston

Summerhouse Houston's supports adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), their familites, and our community through employment, volunterism, and partnerships to foster a culture of belonging, choice and respect.

Human Services
8
Hospice of San Angelo Inc

Hospice of san angelo, inc. (hospice or organization) provides an expert approach to care for those living with a limiting illness in the comfort of their own home and designated nursing homes throughout the twelve counties in the west…

—
9
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Central Texas Inc

To provide lodging and support services to families with critically ill or injured children.

Health
10
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of San Antonio Inc

To provide a safe, caring, and temporary home away from home for the families of children receiving essential medical services in san antonio, texas.

Health
11
Forgotten Angels Inc

To provide quality care to children and adults with developmental disabilities in a safe, loving home environment where they are treated with respect, compassion, and dignity and provided the means, support, and encouragement to reach…

Human Services
12
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities South Texas

Keeping children near the care they need so families can get better together.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ronald Mcdonald House Charities Greater Houston Inc; the most unlike its peers is Grace Lake Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientARC OF BELL COUNTY ARC OF BELL COUNTY: $56,550 · OtherARC OF BELL COUNTY ARC OF BELL COUNTYFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH SCHOOL: $45,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH SCHOOLSIRE INC: $45,000 · OtherSIRE INCIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientB2B MINISTRY: $40,000 · OtherB2B MINISTRYSTILL CREEK RANCH: $38,800 · OtherSTILL CREEK RANCHELIZABETH LUTHERAN CHURCH: $35,500 · OtherELIZABETH LUTHERAN CHURCHVITA LIVING INC: $30,000 · OtherVITA LIVING INCTHE CENTER: $25,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $18,300 · OtherHOUSE OF TINY TREASURES: $17,000 · Other+8 more: $39,000 · Other+8 moreREACH UNLIMITED INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesREACH UNLIMITED INCHospice Brazos Valley Inc: $55,000 · Human ServicesHospice Brazos Valley I…Grace Lake Ministries: $45,000 · Human ServicesGrace Lake Ministries+1 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesGRACEWOOD INC: $60,000 · Housing & ShelterGRACEWOOD I…EIGHT DAYS OF HOPE INC: $30,000 · Housing & ShelterEIGHT DAYS …RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES GREATER HOUSTON INC: $33,000 · HealthRONALD MCD…THE RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF GALVESTON: $30,000 · HealthTHE RONALD…UNITED MITOCHONDRIAL DISEASE FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 · HealthUNITED MIT…+1 more: $2,000 · HealthURBAN OUTREACH INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyHouston Parks Board: $1,000 · PhilanthropySPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$505,150Human Services$177,500Housing & Shelter$90,000Health$77,000Philanthropy$6,000Recreation & Sports$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREACH UNLIMITED INC: $75,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGRACEWOOD INC: $60,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetHospice Brazos Valley Inc: $55,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSIRE INC: $45,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetGrace Lake Ministries: $45,000 over 9y, 6.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES GREATER HOUSTON INC: $33,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF GALVESTON: $30,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetVITA LIVING INC: $30,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEIGHT DAYS OF HOPE INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED MITOCHONDRIAL DISEASE FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN OUTREACH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHouston Hospice: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHouse of Amos: $2,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHouston Parks Board: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds REACH UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds GRACEWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds Hospice Brazos Valley Inc ↗
  • Who funds SIRE INC ↗
  • Who funds Grace Lake Ministries ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES GREATER HOUSTON INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF GALVESTON ↗
  • Who funds VITA LIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds EIGHT DAYS OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED MITOCHONDRIAL DISEASE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Houston Hospice ↗
  • Who funds House of Amos ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Houston Parks Board ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX21.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Baker Hughes Foundation · The Elkins Foundation · Strake Foundation · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Earl W & Hazel C Pierson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Earl W & Hazel C Pierson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Earl W & Hazel C Pierson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Earl W & Hazel C Pierson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Earl W & Hazel C Pierson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph