Skip to content

Texas · Private foundation

Earl W & Hazel C Pierson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$143k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
14
Grants FY2025
14
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$15,000
Organizations funded a year
13 to 20
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$2.0M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations Earl W & Hazel C Pierson Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving14$143k7%
FY202414$138k0%
FY202320$129k30%
FY202217$105k0%
FY202118$92k17%
FY202013$80k0%
FY201914$53k36%
FY201814$52k43%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$420kHuman Services$216kReligion$99kEducation$67kHousing & Shelter$35kFood & Nutrition$13kRecreation & Sports$6kYouth Development$5k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Reach Unlimited Inc$75,00090%
Gracewood Inc$60,00071%
Hospice Brazos Valley Inc$55,00090%
Sire Inc$45,00071%
Grace Lake Ministries$45,00096%
Elizabeth Lutheran Church$35,5008n/a
Ronald McDonald House Charities Greater Houston Inc$33,00070%
The Ronald McDonald House of Galveston$30,00031%
Vita Living Inc$30,00050%
Eight Days of Hope Inc$30,00030%
Show all 18 grantees
All grantees of Earl W & Hazel C Pierson Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Reach Unlimited Inc$75,00090%
Gracewood Inc$60,00071%
Hospice Brazos Valley Inc$55,00090%
Sire Inc$45,00071%
Grace Lake Ministries$45,00096%
Elizabeth Lutheran Church$35,5008n/a
Ronald McDonald House Charities Greater Houston Inc$33,00070%
The Ronald McDonald House of Galveston$30,00031%
Vita Living Inc$30,00050%
Eight Days of Hope Inc$30,00030%
First Baptist Church$18,3002n/a
United Mitochondrial Disease Foundation Inc$12,00060%
Urban Outreach Inc$5,00011%
Special Olympics of Texas Inc$5,00010%
Houston Hospice$5,00010%
House of Amos$2,50012%
Parkinson's Foundation Inc$2,00010%
Houston Parks Board$1,00010%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 15 recipients with no EIN on record ($371k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Earl W & Hazel C Pierson Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetReach Unlimited Inc: $75,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGracewood Inc: $60,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetHospice Brazos Valley Inc: $55,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSire Inc: $45,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetGrace Lake Ministries: $45,000 over 9y, 6.1% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities Greater Houston Inc: $33,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetThe Ronald McDonald House of Galveston: $30,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetVita Living Inc: $30,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEight Days of Hope Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Mitochondrial Disease Foundation Inc: $12,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUrban Outreach Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSpecial Olympics of Texas Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHouston Hospice: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHouse of Amos: $2,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetParkinson's Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHouston Parks Board: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 16.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX21.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Baker Hughes Foundation · The Elkins Foundation · Strake Foundation · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Earl W & Hazel C Pierson Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Earl W & Hazel C Pierson Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Earl W & Hazel C Pierson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Earl W & Hazel C Pierson Foundation

How much does Earl W & Hazel C Pierson Foundation give?
Earl W & Hazel C Pierson Foundation reported 14 grants totaling $142,500 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 13 and 20 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Earl W & Hazel C Pierson Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (49%), Human Services (25%), Religion (11%).
Who are Earl W & Hazel C Pierson Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Reach Unlimited Inc ($75k), Gracewood Inc ($60k), Hospice Brazos Valley Inc ($55k).
Does Earl W & Hazel C Pierson Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Earl W & Hazel C Pierson Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Earl W & Hazel C Pierson Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Shell USA Company Foundation, Enterprise Holdings Foundation, Baker Hughes Foundation.
Where is Earl W & Hazel C Pierson Foundation based?
Earl W & Hazel C Pierson Foundation is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Earl W & Hazel C Pierson’s filings →

More from the funding graph