Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Eagle Shadows

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$37k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192022.

International$5.4MReligion$3.4MArts & Culture$450kHuman Services$250kPhilanthropy$230kFood & Nutrition$200kEducation$45kHealth$25kOther$0
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$36,866
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE$36,866
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $250k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ANGEL ARMIES FOUNDATION: $150k → 13%ANGEL ARMIES FOUNDATION: $100k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
CA
MO
VA
DE
NM
NC
SC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.0M · 9 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2022, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
9

Total granted

$9.0M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+159%
+284%

Still filing today

56%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22
ReligionHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    The Premier Foundation
    3× · 2019–2021 · $4.5M · revenue +288% · 65% of their budget
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    2× · 2019–2020 · $700k · revenue +151%
  • MO
    MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE
    2× · 2021–2022 · $287k · revenue +159%

Funded once

  • TR
    The Redeemed Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $230k · revenue -95%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $200k
  • FC
    FAITH COMES BY HEARING MILITARY MINISTRY
    one grant, 2020 · $200k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
God's Image
Human Services
2
Jesus Connecting the Dots
Food & Nutrition
3
Christian Foundation
4
Divine Revelation Ministry
Religion
5
The Life of Christ Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
6
The Jerusalem Connection
7
Kingdom Project 7 Billion
Religion
8
Practical Christianity Foundation
Religion
9
God's Light in the Darkness Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
11
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
12
Jubal Band Ministries

Jubal band ministries mission is to invite people to become disciples of christian life with jesus.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minuteman Disaster Response Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Redeemed Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The Premier Foundation — $4,452,500 · ReligionThe Premier FoundationCHRIST FOR ALL NATIONS — $1,450,000 · ReligionCHRIST FOR ALL NATIONSSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $700,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSEJesus Image Inc — $600,000 · ReligionJesus Image IncCRU MILITARY MINISTRY — $619,000 · OtherCRU MILITARY MINISTRYK LOVE AIR1 — $450,000 · OtherK LOVE AIR1MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE — $286,866 · OtherMUSEUM OF THE BIBLEIndividual grant recipient — $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipien…FAITH COMES BY HEARING MILITARY MINISTRY — $200,000 · OtherFAITH COMES BY HEARING MI…FOOD FOR THE HUNGRY — $200,000 · OtherFOOD FOR THE HUNGRYONE CAUSE CHURCH — $150,000 · OtherONE CAUSE CHURCH+4 more — $170,000 · Other+4 moreWORLD VISION INC — $250,000 · InternationalFOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC — $250,000 · Human ServicesThe Redeemed Foundation — $230,000 · PhilanthropyMINUTEMAN DISASTER RESPONSE FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Religion$7,202,500Other$2,275,866International$250,000Human Services$250,000Philanthropy$230,000Public Safety & Disaster$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Premier Foundation — $4,452,500 over 3y, 65% of budgetCHRIST FOR ALL NATIONS — $1,450,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $700,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE BIBLE — $286,866 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetWORLD VISION INC — $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC — $250,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetMINUTEMAN DISASTER RESPONSE FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Premier Foundation
  • Who funds CHRIST FOR ALL NATIONS
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds Jesus Image Inc
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC
  • Who funds FOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC
  • Who funds The Redeemed Foundation
  • Who funds MINUTEMAN DISASTER RESPONSE FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Eagle Shadows funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph