Skip to content

· Private foundation

E W Hallett Charitable Tr Ua

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$649k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$224k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Benefit$1.5MEducation$804kHuman Services$553kHealth$484kRecreation & Sports$311kYouth Development$254kFood & Nutrition$173kArts & Culture$142kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $292k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $349k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF CROSBY$223,680
CROSBY IRONTON SCHOOL DISTRICT$75,000
MID-MN WOMEN'S CENTER$50,000
ADVOCATES AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE$40,000
SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES$35,000
LAKES AREA FOOD SHELF$25,000
LEGAL AID SERVICE OF NE MINNESOTA$25,000
LAKES AREA RESTORATIVE JUSTICE$25,000
SECOND HARVEST NORTHLAND$20,000
CUYUNA RANGE YOUTH CENTER$20,000
LAKES AREA MUSIC FESTIVAL$18,000
JFHML FRIENDS FOUNDATION$15,000
HALLETT COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION$14,000
LAKES AREA INTERFAITH CAREGIVERS$13,000
CUYUNA IRON RANGE HERITAGE NETWORK$11,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $284k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF MN: $10k → 11%PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION: $30k → 14%LAKES AREA INTERFAITH CAREGIVERS: $13k → 11%LAKES AREA INTERFAITH CAREGIVERS: $13k → 11%LAKES AREA INTERFAITH CAREGIVERS: $25k → 14%LAKES AREA INTERFAITH CAREGIVERS: $13k → 11%LAKES AREA FOOD SHELF: $25k → 14%LAKES AREA INTERFAITH CAREGIVERS: $13k → 11%LAKES AREA INTERFAITH CAREGIVERS: $10k → 14%LAKES AREA INTERFAITH CAREGIVERS: $13k → 11%PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FDN: $50k → 11%CUYUNA RANGE FOOD SHELF INC: $50k → 11%CUYUNA RANGE FOOD SHELF INC: $10k → 11%HOGE & COMPANY: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.1M · 30 repeat orgs$620k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +105% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
17

Total granted

$4.1M
$490k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+105%
0%

Still filing today

47%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $212k · revenue +193%
  • BO
    BRIDGES OF HOPE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $165k · revenue +24%
  • LA
    LAKES AREA MUSIC FESTIVAL
    7× · 2017–2025 · $107k · revenue +207%

Funded once

  • IM
    INTERNATIONAL MOUNTAIN BICYCLING ASSOC CUYUNA LAKES MOUNTAIN BIKE CREW
    one grant, 2017 · $111k · revenue -62% · 42% of their budget
  • BL
    BRAINERD LAKES DEVELOPMENT CORP
    one grant, 2019 · $74k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Resource Connections Inc

Improving access to and the effectiveness of services through facilitation and coordination of community services and provision of information and referral services.

Community Improvement
2
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud

At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…

Human Services
3
Open Your Heart to the Hungry and Homeless

Since 1986, open your heart to the hungry and homeless has worked to ensureevery minnesotan is free from hunger and homelessness. by partnering with organizations serving those in need, we grow donor engagement and raise awareness to…

—
4
Community Shares of Minnesota

The mission of community shares of minnesota is to create a fair, just and equitable minnesota. community shares of minnesota accomplishes its mission by: supporting collective action to eliminate root causes of inequality and injustice;…

—
5
Mn Community Measurement

Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.

Health
6
Community Pathways of Steele County

To assist individuals and families meet their basic needs by providing resources in a healthy and caring environment. through these actions we build hope and support self-sufficiency.

—
7
Lakeside Curative Services Inc

Provide training and community engagement for youth and individuals with varying abilities to enhance their self-esteem and quality of life.

Health
8
Central Minnesota Council On Aging Inc

The central minnesota council on aging is committed to maintaining the highest level of independence with older people by developing and coordinating community care, reducing isolation and improving access to services.

Human Services
9
Connectability of Mn Inc

Connectability of mn, inc. works to advance the independence, productivity, and full citizenship of people experiencing physical or invisible barriers.

—
10
Mill City Farmers Market Inc

Mission: to inspire and nurture a healthy community by building a local, sustainable, and organic food economy in a vibrant experiential marketplace.vision: to be a nationally recognized marketplace model that connects, educates, and…

—
11
Community Neighborhood Housing Services

Our mission is "empowering individuals and communities by helping people, buy, fix and keep their homes". to further this work, we provide homeownership education and advising as well as residential community lending programs to families…

Housing & Shelter
12
Citizens Utility Board of Minnesota

The citizens utility board (cub) of minnesota champions affordable, reliable, safe, and clean home energy for all minnesotans.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bridges of Hope; the most unlike its peers is Hoge & Company. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
14/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF CROSBY: $1,525,021 · OtherCITY OF CROSBYCROSBY-IRONTON HIGH SCHOOL: $355,780 · OtherCROSBY-IRONTON HIGH SCHOOLCROSBY IRONTON SCHOOL DISTRICT: $288,000 · OtherCROSBY IRONTON SCHOOL DISTRICTHALLETT COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $165,057 · OtherADVOCATES AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE: $135,000 · Other+36 more: $1,182,506 · Other+36 moreSEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES INC: $212,000 · HealthSEXUAL AS…BRIDGES OF HOPE: $165,000 · HealthBRIDGES O…CUYUNA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $20,000 · HealthLAKES AREA INTERFAITH CAREGIVERS: $99,000 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION: $80,000 · Human ServicesCUYUNA RANGE FOOD SHELF INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesLAKES AREA FOOD SHELF: $25,000 · Human ServicesHOGE & COMPANY: $10,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $10,000 · Human ServicesCUYUNA RANGE YOUTH CENTER INC: $161,300 · Youth DevelopmentLAKES AREA MUSIC FESTIVAL: $107,000 · Arts & CultureLEGACY CHORALE OF GREATER MINNESOTA: $10,000 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL MOUNTAIN BICYCLING ASSOC CUYUNA LAKES MOUNTAIN BIKE CREW: $111,000 · Recreation & SportsLAKES AREA RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PROJECT: $47,000 · Philanthropy
Other$3,651,364Health$397,000Human Services$284,000Youth Development$161,300Arts & Culture$117,000Recreation & Sports$111,000Philanthropy$47,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES INC: $212,000 over 8y, 18% of budgetBRIDGES OF HOPE: $165,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetCUYUNA RANGE YOUTH CENTER INC: $161,300 over 8y, 36% of budgetADVOCATES AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE: $135,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MOUNTAIN BICYCLING ASSOC CUYUNA LAKES MOUNTAIN BIKE CREW: $111,000 over 1y, 42% of budgetLAKES AREA MUSIC FESTIVAL: $107,000 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetLAKES AREA INTERFAITH CAREGIVERS: $99,000 over 7y, 19% of budgetKINSHIP PARTNERS INC: $87,500 over 6y, 9.6% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSECOND HARVEST NORTH CENTRAL FOOD BANK: $62,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCUYUNA RANGE FOOD SHELF INC: $60,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetLAKES AREA RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PROJECT: $47,000 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetHOPE INC: $37,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetCUYUNA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSecond Harvest Northland: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMinnesota Council on Foundations: $17,350 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCROW WING COUNTY VICTIM SERVICES: $10,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetLEGACY CHORALE OF GREATER MINNESOTA: $10,000 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetHOGE & COMPANY: $10,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL MN COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNORTHERN COMMUNITY RADIO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAITKIN COUNTY FAIR FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 17% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds CUYUNA RANGE YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCATES AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MOUNTAIN BICYCLING ASSOC CUYUNA LAKES MOUNTAIN BIKE CREW ↗
  • Who funds LAKES AREA MUSIC FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds LAKES AREA INTERFAITH CAREGIVERS ↗
  • Who funds KINSHIP PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST NORTH CENTRAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds CUYUNA RANGE FOOD SHELF INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKES AREA RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKES AREA FOOD SHELF ↗
  • Who funds CUYUNA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Second Harvest Northland ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
  • Who funds Minnesota Council on Foundations ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Otto Bremer TrustMN27.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Otto Bremer Trust · Essentia Health Foundation · Communitygiving · Minnesota Power Foundation · Mardag Foundation · Initiative Foundation · C K Blandin Foundation · Hunger Solutions Minnesota · The Minneapolis Foundation · Northland Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Crow Wing Power Community Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization E W Hallett Charitable Tr Ua funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from E W Hallett Charitable Tr Ua. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to E W Hallett Charitable Tr Ua?

    Find your warmest path to E W Hallett Charitable Tr Ua through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on E W Hallett Charitable Tr Ua’s filings →

    More from the funding graph