Skip to content

· Private foundation

E R Crawford Est Trust Fund a Xxx-Xx-Xxxx

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$436k
Granted FY2025still arriving
74
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$858kEducation$379kFood & Nutrition$251kArts & Culture$214kHealth$208kHuman Services$156kRecreation & Sports$128kYouth Development$86kOther$0
02FY2025 · 74 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k63 grants · $270k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $166k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PENN STATE GREATER ALLEGHENY$30,000
CARNEGIE FREE LIBRARY OF MCKEESPORT$20,000
ALLEGHENY DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS$20,000
MCKEESPORT HISTORY & HERITAGE CENTER$18,000
FRIENDS OF CAMP SOLES$14,000
ST ANTHONY SCHOOL PROGRAMS$12,000
MCKEESPORT AREA MEALS ON WHEELS INC$12,000
GROW PITTSBURGH$10,000
GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$10,000
CENTER FOR VICTIMS$10,000
IN CARE OF CATS INC$10,000
PINE VALLEY CAMP$9,500
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH DUQUESNE$8,000
ELIZABETH TOWNSHIP HISTORICAL SOCIETY$8,000
THE ROCK OF THE REDEEMER CHURCH$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $99k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WAYPOINT YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $8k → 10%WAYPOINT YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $5k → 10%WAYPOINT YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 10%WAYPOINT YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $5k → 10%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $5k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $3k → 11%YMCA: $3k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $3k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $3k → 11%YMCA: $2k → 11%CENTER FOR VICTIMS: $10k → 11%CENTER FOR VICTIMS: $10k → 11%CENTER FOR VICTIMS: $8k → 11%WILMERDING COMMUNITY CENTER: $8k → 11%WILMERDING COMMUNITY CENTER: $6k → 11%WILMERDING COMMUNITY CENTER: $6k → 11%WILMERDING COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 11%WILMERDING COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 119 repeat orgs$317k to everyone else

119 repeat relationships: 61 still active in FY2025, 58 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

119
56

Total granted

$2.3M
$238k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+109%

Still filing today

24%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsArts & CultureHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MR
    MCKEESPORT REGIONAL HISTORY & HERIT
    6× · 2020–2025 · $136k · revenue +12%
  • MM
    Mckeesport Meals on Wheels Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $82k · revenue +101%
  • GP
    GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
    6× · 2020–2025 · $76k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • U
    UPMC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • EV
    ELIZABETH VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • SA
    ST ANTHONY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northeastern Pennsylvania Health Care Foundation
Education
2
Regional Workforce Collaborative - Swpa

To provide policy guidance, technical assistance, and program oversight for the city of pittsburgh and allegheny county, and to assist in the economic development of southwestern pa region.

Community Improvement
3
Mckees Point Development Group Inc

Mckees point development group, inc. was formed to organize, direct, and coordinate economic revitalization and redevelopment projects within the city of mckeesport(allegheny county), pennsylvania.

Community Improvement
4
Belmont Alliance Civic Association

Community development resources

Youth Development
5
Pittsburgh Metropolitan Area Hispanic Chamber of Commerce

The pittsburgh metropolitan area hispanic chamber of commerce is the principal regional advocate for the hispanic business community's civic and economic interests. it is our mission to develop, promote, and advocate on behalf of hispanic…

Community Improvement
6
Greater Erie Economic Development Corporation
—
7
Preservation of Williamsport Foundation Inc

Discover and preserve the historic resources throughout the city of williamsport, pa.

—
8
Wrc Pennsylvania Memorial Home

Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…

Health
9
Penn Soil Rc&D Council

Provide the local leadership necessary to develop and implement a plan that will improve the economy, environmental and social-well being of the people through accelerated planning and development of the natural resources in eight…

Environment
10
Greater Wyoming Valley Area Ymca

The greater wyoming valley area ymca (gwva ymca) is a volunteer led public charity that includes men, women and children of all ages, abilities, incomes, races and religions. our mission is to put christian principles into practice through…

—
11
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
12
Pittsburgh Cares

The organization's purpose is to create flexible, rewarding, and meaningful volunteer opportunities in the pittsburgh region. pittsburgh cares partners with community based organizations to create the volunteer opportunities and recruits…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Victims; the most unlike its peers is Elizabeth Twp Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 188 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/39
Grantees still filing
27/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY GREATER ALLEGHENY CAMPUS: $144,000 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY GREATER ALLEGHENY CAMPUSCARNEGIE FREE LIBRARY OF MCKEESPORT: $126,500 · OtherCARNEGIE FREE LIBRARY OF MCKEESPORT+164 more: $1,715,400 · Other+164 moreMckeesport Meals on Wheels Inc: $81,500 · Food & NutritionMckeespor…GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $75,500 · Food & NutritionGREATER P…GROW PITTSBURGH: $53,500 · Food & NutritionGROW PITT…+2 more: $8,000 · Food & NutritionMCKEESPORT REGIONAL HISTORY & HERIT: $135,500 · Arts & CultureMON RIVER ARTS: $16,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $2,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF CAMP SOLES INC: $73,500 · Recreation & SportsSave Sports Arts & Video Education: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsMONYOUGH TRAIL COUNCIL: $11,500 · Recreation & SportsELIZABETH FORWARD SWIM CLUB: $9,000 · Recreation & SportsWILMERDING COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $29,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR VICTIMS: $28,000 · Human ServicesWAYPOINT YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $23,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $14,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF THE ROSES: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE 9TH STREET CLINIC: $26,500 · HealthHERITAGE COMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $9,500 · HealthNAMI KEYSTONE PENNSYLVANIA: $3,500 · HealthLAROSA YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $25,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,985,900Food & Nutrition$218,500Arts & Culture$153,500Recreation & Sports$109,000Human Services$99,000Health$39,500Youth Development$30,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMCKEESPORT REGIONAL HISTORY & HERIT: $135,500 over 6y, 20% of budgetMckeesport Meals on Wheels Inc: $81,500 over 6y, 11% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $75,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF CAMP SOLES INC: $73,500 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetGROW PITTSBURGH: $53,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetELIZABETH TWP HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $35,200 over 5y, 8.9% of budgetMCKEESPORT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE INTERSECTION: $29,500 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetWILMERDING COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $29,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetCENTER FOR VICTIMS: $28,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE 9TH STREET CLINIC: $26,500 over 4y, 14% of budgetLAROSA YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $25,500 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetJAMIE'S DREAM TEAM: $24,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetWAYPOINT YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $23,000 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetGARDEN CLUB OF MCKEESPORT: $20,500 over 4y, 13% of budgetALLEGHENY DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS: $20,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetMON RIVER ARTS: $16,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetSave Sports Arts & Video Education: $15,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMONYOUGH TRAIL COUNCIL: $11,500 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHERITAGE COMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $9,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetELIZABETH FORWARD SWIM CLUB: $9,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetPA CLEANWAYS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGOODWILL OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWhite Oak Animal Safe Haven No Kill Shelter: $6,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetPITTSBURGH URBAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYMCA OF THE ROSES: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI KEYSTONE PENNSYLVANIA: $3,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMCKEESPORT HOSPITAL JUNIOR COMMITTEE: $3,500 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetThe Pittsburgh Project: $3,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMCKEESPORT AGAPE CENTER: $3,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetHEUER HOUSE: $3,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSALTWORKS THEATRE COMPANY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MCKEESPORT REGIONAL HISTORY & HERIT ↗
  • Who funds Mckeesport Meals on Wheels Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CAMP SOLES INC ↗
  • Who funds GROW PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETH TWP HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MCKEESPORT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE INTERSECTION ↗
  • Who funds WILMERDING COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR VICTIMS ↗
  • Who funds THE 9TH STREET CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds LAROSA YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JAMIE'S DREAM TEAM ↗
  • Who funds WAYPOINT YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GARDEN CLUB OF MCKEESPORT ↗
  • Who funds ALLEGHENY DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charles F Peters FoundationPA51.6× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charles F Peters Foundation · The Pittsburgh Foundation · McKeesport Hospital Foundation · Jefferson Regional Foundation · The Grable Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Upmc Group · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Allegheny Foundation · Snee-Reinhardt Charitable Foundation · The Heinz Endowments · McCune Foundation Pnc Bank Na

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization E R Crawford Est Trust Fund a Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from E R Crawford Est Trust Fund a Xxx-Xx-Xxxx. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to E R Crawford Est Trust Fund a Xxx-Xx-Xxxx?

    Find your warmest path to E R Crawford Est Trust Fund a Xxx-Xx-Xxxx through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 188 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on E R Crawford Est Trust Fund a Xxx-Xx-Xxxx’s filings →

    More from the funding graph