Skip to content
E Milner Trust Uw (Pre-1969 Charitable at a glance

· Private foundation

E Milner Trust Uw (Pre-1969 Charitable

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$37k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$57kAnimals$55kHuman Services$51kPhilanthropy$37kEducation$12kCrime & Legal$12kYouth Development$10kEmployment$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$36,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$593k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF CLINTON COUNTY$36,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PAUL PHILLIPPE RESOURCE CENTER: $7k → 11%PAUL PHILLIPPE RESOURCE CENTER: $6k → 11%PAUL PHILLIPPE RESOURCE CENTER: $6k → 11%PAUL PHILLIPPE RESOURCE CENTER: $6k → 11%PAUL PHILLIPPE RESOURCE CENTER: $6k → 11%PAUL PHILLIPPE RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 11%PAUL PHILLIPPE RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 11%THE ARC OF CLINTON COUNTY INC: $2k → 11%THE ARC OF CLINTON COUNTY INC: $2k → 11%CLINTON COUNTY ASSN FOR RETARDED CITIZEN: $2k → 11%THE ARC OF CLINTON COUNTY: $2k → 11%WECARE OF CLINTON COUNTY: $2k → 11%WECARE OF CLINTON COUNTY: $2k → 11%WECARE OF CLINTON COUNTY INC: $2k → 11%WECARE OF CLINTON COUNTY INC: $2k → 11%WECARE OF CLINTON COUNTY: $2k → 11%WECARE OF CLINTON COUNTY INC: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$270k · 18 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +71% since the first grant, against -80% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
1

Total granted

$270k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
-80%

Still filing today

44%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsYouth DevelopmentEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PAUL PHILLIPPE RESOURCE CENTER INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $41k · revenue +44%
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF CLINTON COUNTY INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $23k · revenue +71%
  • OD
    OPEN DOOR HEALTH CLINIC INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $17k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF CLINTON COUNTY
    one grant, 2025 · $37k · revenue -80%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Clinton County Adult Day Center

The organization provides day care services for the elderly

—
2
Clinton County Services for the Homeless

WE WERE ESTABLISHED to provide shelter and rehablitation SERVICES for the homeless. We provide individuals living quarters for up to 90 days. We train them in employment, financial, AND HOUSING MATTERS. WE PROVIDE HOUSEHOLD FURNISHINGS AND…

Housing & Shelter
3
Clinton County Senior Citizens Drop in Center Inc

Senior center

Human Services
4
Clinton Humane Society

Animal shelter

Animals
5
Clinton County Economic Advancement

To promote the economic development of clinton county, indiana

Community Improvement
6
Clinton County Spca

The organization's mission is to provide shelter, adoption, education, and other progressive community services to further the humane treatment of animals.

Animals
7
Clinton County Humane Society Company
—
8
Clinton Community Christian Corp

To provide assistance to the elderly and poor

Human Services
9
Clinton County Women's Center Inc

Provide crisis intervention, counseling, and shelter; support and empowerment; education, information, and referrals to victims of sexual and domestic violence and to those significant in their lives; and outreach related to the issues of…

Human Services
10
Clinton Arts Center
—
11
Clinton County Housing Coalition

To Empower clients to acheive housing stability and self sufficiency and coordinating services for Clinton County families and Individuals

Housing & Shelter
12
Clinton Animal Rescue Endeavor

Provide animal rescue and adoptions

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Arc of Clinton County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Quinton's House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF CLINTON COUNTY: $36,500 · OtherUNITED WAY OF CLINTON COUNTYIndividual grant recipient: $23,905 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOPEN DOOR CLINIC: $23,761 · OtherOPEN DOOR CLINICWILDCAT WILDLIFE CENTER: $21,995 · OtherWILDCAT WILDLIFE CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $16,310 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $12,233 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRANKFORT COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $12,233 · OtherFRANKFORT COMMUNITY LIBRARYFRANKFORT LIONS CLUB: $8,717 · OtherCLINTON COUNTY ASSOC FOR RETARDED: $7,355 · OtherQUINTON'S HOUSE CHILD ADVOCACY: $7,129 · Other+1 more: $5,104 · OtherPAUL PHILLIPPE RESOURCE CENTER INC: $40,776 · Human ServicesPAUL PHILLIPPE RESOURC…WECARE OF CLINTON COUNTY: $10,626 · Human ServicesWECARE OF CLINTON COUN…THE ARC OF CLINTON COUNTY INC: $8,955 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF CLINTON COU…HUMANE SOCIETY OF CLINTON COUNTY INC: $23,309 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIE…CLINTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $9,313 · AnimalsCLINTON COUN…OPEN DOOR HEALTH CLINIC INC: $17,015 · HealthBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF: $10,442 · Youth DevelopmentLEARNING NETWORK OF CLINTON COUNTY: $10,352 · Education
Other$175,242Human Services$60,357Animals$32,622Health$17,015Youth Development$10,442Education$10,352

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPAUL PHILLIPPE RESOURCE CENTER INC: $40,776 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF CLINTON COUNTY INC: $23,309 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetOPEN DOOR HEALTH CLINIC INC: $17,015 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetWECARE OF CLINTON COUNTY: $10,626 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF: $10,442 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetLEARNING NETWORK OF CLINTON COUNTY: $10,352 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetCLINTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $9,313 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetTHE ARC OF CLINTON COUNTY INC: $8,955 over 4y, 34% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PAUL PHILLIPPE RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CLINTON COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF CLINTON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds WECARE OF CLINTON COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ↗
  • Who funds LEARNING NETWORK OF CLINTON COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CLINTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF CLINTON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds QUINTON'S HOUSE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …United Way for Clinto…Lincoln Legacy Founda…Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation of Howard CountyIN17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Howard County · United Way for Clinton County Inc · Lincoln Legacy Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization E Milner Trust Uw (Pre-1969 Charitable funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from E Milner Trust Uw (Pre-1969 Charitable. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on E Milner Trust Uw (Pre-1969’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home