Skip to content

· Private foundation

E Bowen & Frances H Quillin Foundat

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$58kArts & Culture$42kCommunity Improvement$34kEducation$31kAnimals$27kRecreation & Sports$26kHousing & Shelter$19kEnvironment$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$292k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STEVENSON METHODIST CHURCH$5,000
CEDAR CHAPEL SCHOOL$4,000
WORCESTER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CENTER$4,000
FOUR STEPS RIDING PROGRAM$3,617
LOWER SHORE LAND TRUST$3,000
ASSATEAGUE COASTAL TRUST$3,000
US KENNELS$3,000
WORCESTER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$2,000
LIGHTHOUSE CHURCH OF GOD$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
OCEAN CITY LIFE SAVING MUSEUM$2,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$2,000
RACKLIFFE HOUSE TRUST$2,000
MARYLAND COASTAL BAYS FOUNDATION$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DIAKONIA: $1k → 8%DIAKONIA: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$275k · 28 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
5

Total granted

$275k
$23k

Still filing today

32%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureAnimalsHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WORCESTER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $14k · revenue +55%
  • MC
    MARYLAND COASTAL BAYS FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +174%
  • LS
    LOWER SHORE LAND TRUST INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $7k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • AU
    ATLANTIC UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • WC
    WORCESTER COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • TA
    TYRES AME CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cuttyhunk Historical Society Inc
Arts & Culture
2
Caroline County Humane Society Inc

The society provides an animal shelter for the residents of caroline county, md

Animals
3
Wetlands Foundation
Environment
4
Oceanside Conservation Trust

The organization works to conserve wild or underdeveloped open space, scenic areas, and historic landmarks in the casco bay region.

—
5
Historical Society Harford Cou

Preserve the history of Harford County, Maryland

—
6
Humane Society of Wicomico County Inc

The humane society is working to make a difference in the lives of animals and the people who love and care for them, and is dedicated to relieving the pain and suffering of animals through education and direct intervention.

Animals
7
Fort Defiance Humane Society

Animal sheltering

Animals
8
Marine Mammals of Maine

To rescue injured, sick and abandoned marine mammals and to educate the public about what to do if they find one of these marine mammals.

Arts & Culture
9
Cohasset Conservation Trust Inc
—
10
Arundel Conservation Trust

Land Conservation

Environment
11
Berkeley County Humane Society

Animal welfare

Animals
12
Richardson Maritime Museum Incorporated

The organization is dedicated to preserving and promoting the wooden boatbuilding heritage of maryland's eastern shore with a museum and a wooden boatbuilding center.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maryland Coastal Bays Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Berlin Heritage Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WORCESTER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $24,000 · OtherWORCESTER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CENTERCEDAR CHAPEL SCHOOL: $23,000 · OtherCEDAR CHAPEL SCHOOLSTEVENSON METHODIST CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherSTEVENSON METHODIST CHURCHFOUR STEPS RIDING PROGRAM: $15,274 · OtherFOUR STEPS RIDING PROGRAMATLANTIC UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherATLANTIC UNITED METHODIST CHURCHLIGHTHOUSE CHURCH OF GOD: $13,000 · OtherLIGHTHOUSE CHURCH OF GODOCEAN CITY LIFE SAVING MUSEUM: $13,000 · OtherOCEAN CITY LIFE SAVING MUSEUMIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $11,000 · OtherOC SURF CLUB: $11,000 · OtherLOWER SHORE SUPPORT SERVICES INC: $10,000 · Other+13 more: $47,100 · Other+13 moreWORCESTER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $14,464 · AnimalsWORCESTER …U S KENNELS INCORPORATED: $12,500 · AnimalsU S KENNEL…RACKLIFFE HOUSE TRUST INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureBERLIN HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 · Arts & CultureMARYLAND COASTAL BAYS FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 · EnvironmentLOWER SHORE LAND TRUST INC: $7,000 · EnvironmentASSATEAGUE COASTAL TRUST INC: $3,000 · EnvironmentHUDSON HEALTH SERVICES INC: $5,000 · HealthSTORIES LOVE MUSIC INC: $3,000 · HealthDIAKONIA INC: $2,000 · Human Services
Other$225,374Animals$26,964Arts & Culture$22,000Environment$17,000Health$8,000Human Services$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRACKLIFFE HOUSE TRUST INC: $15,000 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetWORCESTER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $14,464 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetU S KENNELS INCORPORATED: $12,500 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetLOWER SHORE SUPPORT SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetMARYLAND COASTAL BAYS FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLOWER SHORE LAND TRUST INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBERLIN HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetHUDSON HEALTH SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTORIES LOVE MUSIC INC: $3,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetDIAKONIA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBERLIN FIRE COMPANY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RACKLIFFE HOUSE TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds WORCESTER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds U S KENNELS INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds LOWER SHORE SUPPORT SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds MARYLAND COASTAL BAYS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LOWER SHORE LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds BERLIN HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HUDSON HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds STORIES LOVE MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSATEAGUE COASTAL TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds DIAKONIA INC ↗
  • Who funds BERLIN FIRE COMPANY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Eastern ShorMD28.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Eastern Shor · Joan W Jenkins Foundation Inc · Humphreys Foundation Inc · Franklin P and Arthur W Perdue Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization E Bowen & Frances H Quillin Foundat funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from E Bowen & Frances H Quillin Foundat. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 51%
  • Maryland Coastal Bays Foundation Inc: 59% of income from government
  • Diakonia Inc: 51% of income from government
  • Hudson Health Services Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to E Bowen & Frances H Quillin Foundat?

Find your warmest path to E Bowen & Frances H Quillin Foundat through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on E Bowen & Frances H Quillin Foundat’s filings →

More from the funding graph