Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

E Bowen & Frances H Quillin Foundat

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Religion$58kArts & Culture$42kCommunity Improvement$34kEducation$31kAnimals$27kRecreation & Sports$26kHousing & Shelter$19kEnvironment$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$292k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STEVENSON METHODIST CHURCH$5,000
WORCESTER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CENTER$4,000
CEDAR CHAPEL SCHOOL$4,000
FOUR STEPS RIDING PROGRAM$3,617
US KENNELS$3,000
ASSATEAGUE COASTAL TRUST$3,000
LOWER SHORE LAND TRUST$3,000
OCEAN CITY LIFE SAVING MUSEUM$2,000
WORCESTER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
LIGHTHOUSE CHURCH OF GOD$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$2,000
OC SURF CLUB$2,000
RACKLIFFE HOUSE TRUST$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DIAKONIA: $1k → 8%DIAKONIA: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$275k · 28 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
5

Total granted

$275k
$23k

Still filing today

32%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureAnimalsHealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WORCESTER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $14k · revenue +55%
  • MC
    MARYLAND COASTAL BAYS FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +255%
  • BH
    BERLIN HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +207%

Funded once

  • AU
    ATLANTIC UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • WC
    WORCESTER COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • TA
    TYRES AME CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cuttyhunk Historical Society Inc
Arts & Culture
2
Caroline County Humane Society Inc

The society provides an animal shelter for the residents of caroline county, md

Animals
3
Wetlands Foundation
Environment
4
Oceanside Conservation Trust

The organization works to conserve wild or underdeveloped open space, scenic areas, and historic landmarks in the casco bay region.

5
Historical Society Harford Cou

Preserve the history of Harford County, Maryland

6
Humane Society of Wicomico County Inc

The humane society is working to make a difference in the lives of animals and the people who love and care for them, and is dedicated to relieving the pain and suffering of animals through education and direct intervention.

Animals
7
Fort Defiance Humane Society

Animal sheltering

Animals
8
Marine Mammals of Maine

To rescue injured, sick and abandoned marine mammals and to educate the public about what to do if they find one of these marine mammals.

Arts & Culture
9
Cohasset Conservation Trust Inc
10
Arundel Conservation Trust

Land Conservation

Environment
11
Berkeley County Humane Society

Animal welfare

Animals
12
Richardson Maritime Museum Incorporated

The organization is dedicated to preserving and promoting the wooden boatbuilding heritage of maryland's eastern shore with a museum and a wooden boatbuilding center.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maryland Coastal Bays Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Berlin Heritage Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WORCESTER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $24,000 · OtherWORCESTER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CENTERCEDAR CHAPEL SCHOOL — $23,000 · OtherCEDAR CHAPEL SCHOOLSTEVENSON METHODIST CHURCH — $20,000 · OtherSTEVENSON METHODIST CHURCHFOUR STEPS RIDING PROGRAM — $15,274 · OtherFOUR STEPS RIDING PROGRAMATLANTIC UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $15,000 · OtherATLANTIC UNITED METHODIST CHURCHOCEAN CITY LIFE SAVING MUSEUM — $13,000 · OtherOCEAN CITY LIFE SAVING MUSEUMLIGHTHOUSE CHURCH OF GOD — $13,000 · OtherLIGHTHOUSE CHURCH OF GODIndividual grant recipient — $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $11,000 · OtherOC SURF CLUB — $11,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $11,000 · OtherLOWER SHORE SUPPORT SERVICES INC — $10,000 · Other+13 more — $47,100 · Other+13 moreWORCESTER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $14,464 · AnimalsWORCESTER …U S KENNELS INCORPORATED — $12,500 · AnimalsU S KENNEL…RACKLIFFE HOUSE TRUST INC — $15,000 · Arts & CultureBERLIN HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC — $7,000 · Arts & CultureLOWER SHORE LAND TRUST INC — $7,000 · EnvironmentMARYLAND COASTAL BAYS FOUNDATION INC — $7,000 · EnvironmentASSATEAGUE COASTAL TRUST INC — $3,000 · EnvironmentHUDSON HEALTH SERVICES INC — $5,000 · HealthSTORIES LOVE MUSIC INC — $3,000 · HealthDIAKONIA INC — $2,000 · Human Services
Other$225,374Animals$26,964Arts & Culture$22,000Environment$17,000Health$8,000Human Services$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRACKLIFFE HOUSE TRUST INC — $15,000 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetWORCESTER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $14,464 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetU S KENNELS INCORPORATED — $12,500 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetLOWER SHORE SUPPORT SERVICES INC — $10,000 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetLOWER SHORE LAND TRUST INC — $7,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMARYLAND COASTAL BAYS FOUNDATION INC — $7,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBERLIN HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC — $7,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetHUDSON HEALTH SERVICES INC — $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTORIES LOVE MUSIC INC — $3,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetDIAKONIA INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBERLIN FIRE COMPANY INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RACKLIFFE HOUSE TRUST INC
  • Who funds WORCESTER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds U S KENNELS INCORPORATED
  • Who funds LOWER SHORE SUPPORT SERVICES INC
  • Who funds LOWER SHORE LAND TRUST INC
  • Who funds MARYLAND COASTAL BAYS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds BERLIN HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HUDSON HEALTH SERVICES INC
  • Who funds ASSATEAGUE COASTAL TRUST INC
  • Who funds STORIES LOVE MUSIC INC
  • Who funds DIAKONIA INC
  • Who funds BERLIN FIRE COMPANY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Eastern ShorMD28.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Eastern Shor · Joan W Jenkins Foundation Inc · Humphreys Foundation Inc · Franklin P and Arthur W Perdue Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization E Bowen & Frances H Quillin Foundat funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 51%
  • Maryland Coastal Bays Foundation Inc59% of income from government
  • Diakonia Inc51% of income from government
  • Hudson Health Services Inc3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to E Bowen & Frances H Quillin Foundat?

Find your warmest path to E Bowen & Frances H Quillin Foundat through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph